Exploring ‘Thing-Power’ and the ‘Spectre of Fear’ on Schooling Subjectivities: A Critical Posthuman Analysis of LGBT Silencing

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter experiments with critical posthumanist theory to explore the silencing and invisibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) diversities in school education. Drawing on the work of Barad, Bennett, and Braidotti, we deploy concepts such as ‘intra-action’, ‘thing-power’, and ‘dark matter’ to tentatively delve into the ways in which both the tangible and intangible entangle and enjoin human subjectivities in the classroom and in the education milieu more broadly. We explore how these theorisations can be used to explicate, what we coin, the ‘spectre of fear’ surrounding LGBT-inclusivity in the K-12 classroom. We endeavour to demonstrate the interplays, interconnections and collisions between the human and nonhuman and to understand the ways in which these entanglements have material effect. Importantly, we consider that the recognition of these relational and intertwined subjectivities that transcend the human subject can produce understandings and knowledges that advocate for a more equitable, harmonious, and socially sustainable planet.

Keywords

Discursive Practice Biology Teacher Australian Curriculum Local Determinacy Teacher Subject 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). The Australian Curriculum. Health and Physical Education, Foundation to Year 10. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/ healthandphysical education/Curriculum/F-10
  2. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2013). Strengthening human rights education in the Health and Physical Education Curriculum: Foundation to Year 10. Retrieved from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/submissions/strengthening-human-rights-education-health-and-physical-education-curriculum-foundation
  3. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831. doi: 10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A Political ecology of things. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Dumont, C. W., Jr. (2008). The promise of poststructuralist sociology: Marginalized peoples and the problem of knowledge. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Epstein, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Schooling sexualities. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ferfolja, T. (2013). Sexual diversity, discrimination and ‘homosexuality policy’ in New South Wales’ government schools. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 13(2), 159–171. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2012.697858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferfolja, T. (2014a). Lesbian and gay teachers: Negotiating subjectivities in Sydney schools. In M.-P. Moreau (Ed.), (In)equalities in the teaching profession: A global perspective (pp. 139–156). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Ferfolja, T. (2014b). Reframing queer teacher subjects: Neither in nor out but present. In A. Harris & E. M. Gray (Eds.), Queer teachers, identity and performativity (pp. 29–44). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferfolja, T. (2015). LGBT equity and school policy: Perspectives from Canada and Australia. In F. J. Levine, L. D. Hill, Y. Cheong Cheng, S. Lindblom-Ylanne, E. L. Baker, & O. Kim Lee (Eds.), World education research yearbook. (pp 93–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Ferfolja, T., & Hopkins, L. (2013). The complexities of workplace experience for lesbian and gay teachers. Critical Studies in Education, 54(3), 311–324. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.794743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferfolja, T., & Stavrou, E. (2015). Workplace experiences of Australian lesbian and gay teachers: Findings from a national survey. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Practice,no 173, pp. 113-138.Google Scholar
  15. Ferfolja, T., & Ullman, J. (2014). Opportunity lost and (re) written out: LGBTI content in Australia’s ‘new’ national Health and Physical Education curriculum. In S. Gannon & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Contemporary issues of equity in education (pp. 69–87). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ferfolja, T., & Ullman, J. (2017, in press). Parents’ perspectives and experiences of LGBTQ-content in/exclusion in school education. Sex Education, Special Issue. Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume 1: An introduction. (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  18. Frost, S., & Coole, D. H. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In S. Frost & D. H. Coole (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham, UK/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hardie, A. (2012). Lesbian teachers and students: Issues and dilemmas of being ‘out’ in primary school. Sex Education, 12(3), 273–282. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2011.615595.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, A., & Gray, E. M. (2014). Queer teachers, identity and performativity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hillier, L., Jones, T., Monagle, M., Overton, N., Gahan, L., Blackman, J., et al. (2010). Writing themselves in 3: The third national report on the sexuality, health and well-being of same sex attracted young people. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, T., Gray, E., & Harris, A. (2014). GLBTIQ teachers in Australian education policy: Protections, suspicions, and restrictions. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 14(3), 338–353. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2014.901908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Juelskjaer, M. (2013). Gendered subjectivities of spacetimematter. Gender and Education, 25(6), 754–768. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.831812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2013.824072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National LGBTI Health Alliance. (2012). Email to ACARA, HPE Curriculum Team, March 12, 2012.Google Scholar
  26. Ullman, J. (2014). Ladylike/butch, sporty/dapper: Exploring ‘gender-climate’ with Australian LGBTQ students using stage-environment fit theory. Sex Education, 14(4), 430–443. doi: 10.1080/14681811.2014.919912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ullman, J. (2015). Regulating ‘gender-climate’: Heteronormativity and the social construction of gender in regional and rural Australian schools. In T. Ferfolja, C. Jones-Diaz, & J. Ullman (Eds.), Understanding sociological theory for pedagogical practices (pp.39-57). Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ullman, J., & Ferfolja, T. (2015). Bureaucratic constructions of sexual diversity: ‘Sensitive’, ‘controversial’ and silencing. Teaching Education, 26(2), 145–159. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2014.959487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ullman, J., & Ferfolja, T. (forthcoming). The elephant in the (class)room: Parental perceptions of LGBTQ-inclusivity in K-12 educational contexts. Google Scholar
  30. Ullman, J., & McGraw, K. (2014). Troubling silences and taboo texts: Constructing safer and more positive school climates for same-sex attracted high school students in Australia. In D. Carlson & E. Meyer (Eds.), Gender and sexualities in education: A reader (pp. 298–312). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  31. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2013). Australian curriculum health and physical education: Foundation to year 10. Retrieved from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Documents/auscurric/response_from_victoria_HPE.pdf
  32. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations