Infants’ Practices: Shaping (and Shaped by) the Arrangements of Early Childhood Education

  • Andi SalamonEmail author


Research about infant pedagogy is often restricted to educators’ espoused beliefs and interpretations, with a limited view into how those beliefs might be enacted in practice and potentially impact on babies’ lived experiences. This chapter examines infants’ practices in early childhood education (ECE) contexts, and the arrangements of ECE practice that enable and constrain them. Drawing on data generated from the author’s doctoral study, the chapter considers the conceptions of educators as among the practice architectures which shape infants’ practices. How educators’ conceptions of infants’ capabilities manifest in their sayings, doings, and relatings is briefly explored. The primary focus on infants’ subsequent practices reveals the potential impact of the practice architectures of ECE on opportunities for babies’ learning, and adds to existing literature about infants’ lived experiences in ECE settings. Infants’ practices are not only shaped by the practice architectures of ECE, they also shape the practices of educators and, so, the practice architectures of their particular setting. Implications for the agency of infants in actively contributing to their lived experiences in ECE settings are discussed.


Early Childhood Education Bodily Expression Social Capability Solitary Play Practice Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I would like to acknowledge and thank my supervisors, Professors Jennifer Sumsion and Linda Harrison and Associate Professor Fran Press, for their invaluable mentorship. I would also like to acknowledge and thank the editors of this book for their ongoing support and the critical feedback that helped re-shape this chapter.


  1. Andrew, Y. (2015). What we feel and what we do: Emotional capital in early childhood work. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development. doi: 10.1080/09575146.2015.1077206.
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, B., Sumsion, J., Stratigos, T., & Elwick, S. (2012). Baby events: Assembling descriptions of infants in family day care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, X., Green, J. A., & Gustafson, G. E. (2009). Development of vocal protests from 3 to 18 months. Infancy, 14(1), 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9(4), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cortazar, A., & Herreros, F. (2010). Early attachment relationships and the early childhood curriculum. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(2), 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, B., & Degotardi, S. (2015). Educators’ understandings of, and support for, infant peer relationships in early childhood settings. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(1), 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Degotardi, S. (2011). From greetings to meetings: How infant peers welcome and accommodate a newcomer into their classroom. The First Years Tga Tua Tuatahi: New Zealand Journal of Infant and Toddler Education, 13(2), 29–33.Google Scholar
  9. Degotardi, S., & Pearson, E. (2009). Relationship theory in the nursery: Attachment and beyond. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 144–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Degotardi, S., & Sweller, N. (2012). Mind-mindedness in infant child-care: Associations with early childhood practitioner sensitivity and stimulation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dobbs, J., & Arnold, D. H. (2009). Relationship between preschool teachers‚ reports of children’s behavior and their behavior toward those children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elfer, P. (2012). Emotion in nursery work: Work discussion as a model of critical professional reflection. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(2), 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elwick, S., Bradley, B., & Sumsion, J. (2014). Infants as others: Uncertainties, difficulties and (im)possibilities in researching infants’ lives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(2), 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (2015). The body in professional practice, learning and education: A question of corporeality. In B. Green & N. Hopwood (Eds.), The body in professional practice, learning and education (pp. 15–33). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Howes, C., & Toyan, H. (1999). Peer relations. In L. Balter & C. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 143–157). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (2014). Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leavitt, R. L. (1994). Power and emotion in infant-toddler day care. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mahon, K., Kemmis, S., Francisco, S., & Lloyd, A. (2017). Introduction: Practice theory and the theory of practice architectures. In K. Mahon, S. Francisco, & S. Kemmis (Eds.), Exploring education and professional practice – Through the lens of practice architectures (pp. 1–30). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. McDowall Clark, R., & Baylis, S. (2012). ‘Wasted down there’: Policy and practice with the under-threes. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32(2), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakayama, H. (2010). Development of infant crying behavior: A longitudinal case study. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(4), 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nyland, B. (2009). Language experiences of preverbal children in Australian childcare centres. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(1), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Page, J. (2014). Developing professional love in early childhood settings. In L. J. Harrison & J. Sumsion (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care (Vol. 11, pp. 119–130). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Page, J., & Elfer, P. (2013). The emotional complexity of attachment interactions in nursery. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(4), 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parten, M. (1932). Social participation among preschool children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ready, D. R., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Recchia, S. L., & Shin, M. (2010). “Baby teachers”: How pre-service early childhood students transform their conceptions of teaching and learning through an infant practicum. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 30(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rist, R. (2000). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 70(3), 257–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rockel, J. (2009). A pedagogy of care: Moving beyond the margins of managing work and minding babies. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 34, 0–41.Google Scholar
  29. Rossholt, N. (2009). The complexity of bodily events through an ethnographer’s gaze: Focusing on the youngest children in preschool. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rubin, K., Coplan, R., Chen, X., Buskirk, A., & Wojslawowicz, J. (1999). Peer relationships in childhood. In M. Borsntein & M. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental Psychology: An advanced textbook (Vol. 5, pp. 469–512). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Salamon, A. (2011). How the early years learning framework can help shift pervasive beliefs of the social and emotional capabilities of infants and toddlers. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(1), 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salamon, A. (2015). Ethical symmetry in participatory research with infants. Early Child Development and Care, 185(6), 1016–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salamon, A., & Harrison, L. (2015). Early childhood educators’ conceptions of infants’ capabilities: The nexus between beliefs and practice. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 35(3), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salamon, A., Sumsion, J., Press, F., & Harrison, L. (2015). Implicit theories and naïve beliefs: Using the theory of practice architectures to deconstruct the practices of early childhood educators. Journal of Early Childhood Research. doi: 10.1177/1476718X14563857.
  35. Shin, M. (2010). Peeking at the relationship world of infant friends and caregivers. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(3), 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sommer, D., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Hundeide, K. (2013). Early childhood care and education: A child perspective paradigm. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 21(4), 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stratigos, T. (2015). Assemblages of desire: Infants, bear caves and belonging in early childhood education and care. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(1), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sumsion, J., Harrison, L., Press, F., McLeod, S., Goodfellow, J., & Bradley, B. (2011). Researching infants’ experiences of early childhood education and care. In D. Harcourt, B. Perry, & T. Waller (Eds.), Researching young children’s perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children (pp. 113–127). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Taggart, G. (2011). Don’t we care? The ethics and emotional labour of early years professionalism. Early Years, 31(1), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zinsser, K. M., Shewark, E. A., Denham, S. A., & Curby, T. W. (2014). A mixed-method examination of preschool teacher beliefs about social-emotional learning and relations to observed emotional support. Infant and Child Development, 23(5), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Teacher EducationCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations