ICYCSEE 2016: Social Computing pp 92-101 | Cite as

Thread Structure Prediction for MOOC Discussion Forum

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 624)

Abstract

Discussion forums are an indispensable interactive component for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). However, the organization of current discussion forums is not well-designed. Trouble-shooting threads are valuable for both learners and instructors, but they are drowned out in the forums with huge amounts of threads. This work first built a labeled data set for trouble-shooting thread structure prediction by crowdsourcing and then proposed methods for trouble-shooting thread detection and thread structure prediction on the data set. The output of this work can be used to spot trouble-shooting threads and show them along with structure tags in MOOC discussion forums.

Keywords

Thread structure prediction Crowdsourcing Lightly supervised learning MOOC 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work is sponsored by Quanta Computers, Inc. under the Qmulus Project and National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572151 and 71573065).

References

  1. 1.
    Lori, B., David, P., Jennifer, D., Glenda, S., Ho, A., Seaton, D.T.: Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edx’s first mooc. Res. Pract. Assess. 8, 13–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abel, F., Bittencourt, I.I., Henze, N., Krause, D., Vassileva, J.: A rule-based recommender system for online discussion forums. In: Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P., Herder, E. (eds.) AH 2008. LNCS, vol. 5149, pp. 12–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anaya, A.R., Boticario, J.G.: A data mining approach to reveal representative collaboration indicators in open collaboration frameworks. In: International Working Group on Educational Data Mining, pp. 210–219 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dringus, L.P., Ellis, T.: Using data mining as a strategy for assessing asynchronous discussion forums. Comput. Educ. 45, 141–160 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, F.-R., Hsieh, L.-S., Chuang, F.-T.: Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining. Comput. Educ. 52, 481–495 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Engaging with massive online courses. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 687–698 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wen, M., Yang, D., Rosé, C.: Linguistic reflections of student engagement in massive open online courses. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ramesh, A., Goldwasser, D.: Modeling learner engagement in MOOCs using probabilistic soft logic. In: NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, pp. 1–7 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stump, G.S., Deboer, J., Whittinghill, J., Breslow, L.: Development of a framework to classify MOOC discussion forum posts : methodology and challenges. In: NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, pp. 1–20 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, H., Wang, C., Zhai, C., Han, J.: Learning online discussion structures by conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 435–444 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, L., Lui, M., Kim, S.N., Nivre, J., Baldwin, T.: Predicting thread discourse structure over technical web forums. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 13–25 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, S., Wang, L., Baldwin, T.: Tagging and linking web forum posts. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 192–202 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hong, L., Davison, B.D.: A classification-based approach to question answering in discussion boards. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2009, pp. 171–178. ACM Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cong, G., Wang, L., Lin, C.-Y., Song, Y.-I., Sun, Y.: Finding question-answer pairs from online forums. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 467–474. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCallum, A., Mann, G., Druck, G.: Generalized expectation criteria (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and TechnologyHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations