Playing on the Edge

  • Daniel Cermak-SassenrathEmail author
Part of the Gaming Media and Social Effects book series (GMSE)


Everything gets more interesting, challenging, or intense the closer it gets to the edge, and so does play. How edgy can play become and still be play? Based on Huizinga’s notion of play, this chapter discusses how a wide range of playful activities pushes the boundaries of play in different and specific ways. For instance, gambling for money, party and drinking games, professional play and show sports, art installations, violent and military propaganda computer games, pervasive/mobile gaming, live-action role playing, festivals, performances, and games such as Ghosting and Planking. It is argued that in concert with a number of characteristics that mark an activity as play, play is essentially a subjective perspective and individual decision of the player. Huizinga calls this attitude the play spirit, which informs a player’s actions and is in turn sustained by them. Edgy digital or mobile games do not challenge this position, but make it more obvious than traditional games that play is not only an activity, but a concept.


  1. (n.d.). Twister—game. Retrieved Mar 7, 2012, from Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. (2005, Jan 12). No pain, no game. The Independent. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from
  3. Bateson, G. (1971). A theory of play and fantasy. In Gregory Bateson (Ed.), Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Biskind, P. (1999). Easy Riders, Raging Bulls. How the Sex ‘n’ Drugs ‘n’ Rock ‘n’ Roll Generation Saved Hollywood (10th ed.). London: Bloomsbury, paperback.Google Scholar
  5. Bolter, J. D. & Gromala, D. (2003). Windows and Mirrors. Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brainy Quote. (2012). Retrieved Feb 2, 2012 from
  7. Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1933). Wesen und Sinn des Spiels. Das Spielen des Menschen und der Tiere als Erscheinungsform der Lebenstriebe. Berlin: Kurt Wolff.Google Scholar
  8. Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2010a). Interaktivität als Spiel - Neue Perspektiven auf den Alltag mit dem Computer. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
  9. Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2010b). The logic of play in everyday human computer interaction. In S. Günzel, M. Liebe, & D. Mersch (Eds.), Logic and structure of the computer game, (pp. 80–103). Potsdam: Potsdam Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
  10. Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2013). Makin’ cake and the meaning in games. In L.-L. Chen, T. Djajadiningrat, L. Feijs, S. Fraser, J. Hu, S. Kyffin & D. Steffen (Eds.), Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DeSForM) 2013(pp. 199–203).Google Scholar
  11. Cermak-Sassenrath, D. (2015). Playful computer interaction. In V. Frissen, S. Lammes, M. de Lange, J. de Mul, & J. Raessens (Eds.), Playful identities. The ludification of digital media cultures (Chap. 4, pp. 93–110). Amsterdam: Amsterdam Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
  12. Chamblanc, F. D. (1828). Das Kriegsspiel, oder das Schachspiel im Großen. Wien: Nach einer leicht faßlichen Methode dargestellt.Google Scholar
  13. Château, J. (1946). Le jeu de l’enfant. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  14. Christ, K. (2005). Geschichte der rmischen Republik. Von Augustus bis zu Konstantin (5th ed.). Munich: C. H. Beck, rev.Google Scholar
  15. Crawford, C. (December 1987). Similarities with other media. Journal of Computer Game Design, 1(5). Retrieved June 25, 2004, from
  16. Crime Plays. (n.d). Crime Plays | SAFETY. Retrieved Nov 20, 2013 from!safety/c24qc.
  17. Crogan, P. (2011). Gameplay Mode. War, Simulation, and Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deutschlandfunk. Corso—Kultur nach drei, June 1, 2006. My notes.Google Scholar
  19. Deutschlandfunk. Olympia zwischen Fairplay und Manipulation, Aug 18, 2004. My notes.Google Scholar
  20. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dyer-Witheford, N., & de Peuter, G. (2009). Games of Empire. Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Eigen, M., & Winkler, R. (1990). Das Spiel. Naturgesetze steuern den Zufall. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
  23. Fink, E. (1957). Oase des Glücks. Gedanken zu einer Ontologie des Spiels. Freiburg: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  24. Fischer, A. (1925) Psychologie der Arbeit. Die Arbeitsschule (pp. 65–76).Google Scholar
  25. Frissen, V., Lammes, S., de Lange, M., de Mul, J., & Raessens, J. (Eds.). (2015). Playful Identities. The Ludification of Digital Media Cultures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  26. fritz51338. (2012, June 14). Winners – Go for gold 1988. Retrieved Mar 12, 2014, from
  27. Game Oven. (n.d). Fingle for iPad. Scholar
  28. Hardy, M., & Totman, S. (2012). From dictatorship to democracy: Simulating the politics of the Middle East. In C. Nygaard, N. Courtney, & E. Leigh (Eds.), Simulations, Games and Role Play in University Education, The Learning in Higher Education (LIHE) Series (pp. 189–206). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Hasbro. (n.d.). Twister for two, three, four or more players (manual). Retrieved Mar 7, 2012, from
  30. Heckhausen, H. (1973). Entwurf einer Psychologie des Spielens. In A. Flitner (Ed.), Das Kinderspiel (pp. 138–55). Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
  31. Heidfeld, N. (2007, Sep 16). Formula 1 coverage. RTL.Google Scholar
  32. Hide & Seek Productions Ltd. (2013). The new year games : Projects : Hide&seek. Retrieved Nov 26, 2013, from
  33. Hobsbawm, E. (1995). Age of Extremes. The Short Twentieth Century 1914–1991. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  34. Hodes, J., & Ruby-Sachs, E. (2002, Sept 2). ‘America’s Army’ targets youth. The Nation. Retrieved Feb 17, 2012, from
  35. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ice-T. M.V.P.s. LP. (1991). OG Original Gangster.Google Scholar
  37. Irving, J. (2006). Until I Find You. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  38. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Juul, J. (2005). Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Keller, P. E. (1998). Arbeiten und Spielen am Arbeitsplatz: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Software-Entwicklung. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus. Also: Bremen, University, Dissertation, 1997.Google Scholar
  41. Krämer, S. (1995). Spielerische Interaktion. Überlegungen zu unserem Umgang mit Instrumenten. In Florian Rtzer, editor, Schöne neue Welten? Auf dem Weg zu einer neuen Spielkultur (pp. 225–237). Munich: Boer.Google Scholar
  42. Lacroix, M. (2012, Feb 7). Kommentar: Viel Gutes und ein ganz dickes ABER. Speedweek (8), 24.Google Scholar
  43. Lenoir, T., & Lowood, H. (n.d.). Theaters of war: The military-entertainment complex. Retreived June 13, 2012, from, An updated version ( (June 16, 2012)) to appear. (In J. Lazardzig, H. Schramm, & L. Schwarte (eds.). (2003). Kunstkammer, Laboratorium, Bühne–Schauplätze des Wissens im 17. Jahrhundert/Collection, Laboratory, Theater. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Publishers.
  44. Magistrix. (n.d.). The Winners – Go for gold lyrics. Retrieved Mar 12, 2014, from
  45. Manovich, L. (2000). The Language of New Media. Retrieved Aug 9, 2002, from
  46. Marriott, M. (2001, May 31). Playing games gets serious (and painful). New York Times. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from
  47. Martin, M., Gavin, J., Cermak-Sassenrath, D., Walker, C., & Kenobi, B. (2013). Shadow showdown: Twister in a digital space. In Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (IE2013): Matters of Life and Death, IE ’13, pp. 34:1–34:2. New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  48. McCarthy, K. (2001, June 8). Electric shock game controller on the way. The Register. Retreived May 16, 2012, from
  49. McLuhan, M. (2002). Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Moss, S. (1959, Jan 24). To really understand the world of men like Mike Hawthorn...their compulsions, fears and exhilarations you have to know their every thought...never before bared so honestly as now. Daily Express.Google Scholar
  51. Nickelback. (2005). Rockstar. LP All the right reasons, lyrics from (Feb 16, 2012). Written by Chad Kroeger, Michael Kroeger, Ryan Peake, Daniel Adair.
  52. Nieborg, D. B. (2009). Empower yourself, defend freedom! playing games during times of war. In M. van den Boomen, S. Lammes, A.-S. Lehmann, J. Raessens, & M. T. Schäfer (Eds.), Digital Material-Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology (pp. 35–47). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Norman,D. A. (2004). Emotional Design. Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. O’Brien, P. (2012, Jan 22). Maradona sticks it up for Messi. Sport 360\(^{\circ }\) (464), 3.Google Scholar
  55. Pias, C. (2002). Computer Spiel Welten. Munich: Sequenzia. Also: Weimar, University, Dissertation, 2000; Retrieved Oct 28, 2004, from
  56. Rayner, A. (2012, Mar 18). Are video games just propaganda and training tools for the military? The Guardian. Retrieved Mar 19, 2012, from
  57. Retter, H. (1998) Einführung in die Pädagogik des Spiels. Braunschweig: Institut für Allgemeine Pädagogik und Technische Bildung der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, Abteilung Historisch-Systematische Pädagogik, new ed. 2003.Google Scholar
  58. Roch, A. (2009). Claude E. Shannon: Spielzeug, Leben und die geheime Geschichte seiner Theorie der Information. Berlin: Gegenstalt.Google Scholar
  59. Roth, P. (2002). The Dying Animal. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  60. RTL. Verleihung des Laureus 2004. TV, Mar 26, 2005. My notes.Google Scholar
  61. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of Play. Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schaller, J. (1861). Das Spiel und die Spiele. Weimar: Bhlau.Google Scholar
  63. Scheuerl, H. (1965). Das Spiel. Untersuchungen über sein Wesen, seine pädagogischen Mglichkeiten und Grenzen (4th/5th ed.). Weinheim: Julius Beltz.Google Scholar
  64. Schlickmann, D. (2006). June 14). Nowitzki für immer in Dallas. Sport Bild, 24, 68–9.Google Scholar
  65. Schmitt, S. (2004). Feb 2). Verspielte Forscher. Computer Zeitung, 6, 6.Google Scholar
  66. Schnell gesagt! Motorsport aktuell, (1–3):28–29, Dec 17, 2013.Google Scholar
  67. Schüll, N. D. (2012). Addiction by Design. Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Scott, M. (2012). Aug 7). Es bleibt viel Zeit für das Nichtstun. Speedweek, 34, 36–8.Google Scholar
  69. Seeßlen, G., & Rost, C. (1984). Pac-Man & Co. Die Welt der Computerspiele. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  70. Sniderman, S. (n.d). The life of games.
  71. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. The Planking Game. (2012). N.n. Retrieved May 1, 2012, from
  73. The Long Dog. (n.d.). Usability—a matter of life and death. In The Long Dog (ed.), Web, Digital and Communications Blather. Retrieved Mar 19, 2012, from
  74. Turse, N. (2003). Bringing the war home: The new military-industrial-entertainment complex at war and play. Retreived Feb 17, 2012, from
  75. Ulie, C. (2001, June 7). The latest sensation in gaming. InformationWeek. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from
  76. Wallraff, G. (1992). Mein Tagebuch aus der Bundeswehr. Mit einem Beitrag von Flottillenadmiral Elmar Schmähling und einem Dialog zwischen Günter Wallraff und Jürgen Fuchs. Cologne: KiWi.Google Scholar
  77. Weber, S. (2004). Theatricality as Medium. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wichert, S. (2006). Aug 20). Der Schlägertyp. Welt am Sonntag, 34, 74.Google Scholar
  79. Wikipedia. (2012a). Knife game. Retrieved Mar 14, 2012, from
  80. Wikipedia. (2012b). Twister (game). Retrieved Mar 7, 2012, from
  81. Winter, R. (1995). Der produktive Zuschauer. Quintessenz, MMV Medizin: Medienaneignung als kultureller und ästhetischer Prozeß. Munich.Google Scholar
  82. WSRA, Inc. (2012a). Truth or Dare online: How to play Truth or Dare. Retrieved May 7, 2012, from
  83. WSRA, Inc. (2012b). Truth or Dare online: Preferences. Retrieved May 7, 2012, from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Computer Games Research IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations