Selection of Reverse Logistics Operating Channels Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS: A Pakistani Case

  • Muhammad Nazam
  • Muhammad Hashim
  • Jamil Ahmad
  • Waseem Ahmad
  • Muhammad Tahir
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 502)

Abstract

In the emerging business environment, the organizations must promote alternative uses of resources that may be cost-effective and eco-friendly by extending products’ routine life cycles. In this perspective, an efficient management of product returns through reverse logistics operating channels is a strategic issue. Business organizations including those of automobile manufacturing industries would like to focus on their core competency areas and there is need of making outsourcing decisions of their reverse logistics operating channels. There are five operating channels of reverse logistics; Supplier Operation, Manufacturer Operation, Distributor Operation, Third Party Operation and Joint Operation. The objective of this work is to develop the multi-criteria group decision support system to assist the top management of the company in selection of reverse logistics operating channels through integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) under fuzzy environment. An illustrative case is included to validate the proposed method. The key findings and managerial insights of present study also enables the logistics managers to better understand the complex relationships of the main attributes in the decision making environment and subsequently improve the reliability of the decision making process.

Keywords

Reverse logistics Operating channels Automotive sector Fuzzy AHP−TOPSIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Amin M, Zahora Nasharuddin S (2013) Hospital service quality and its effects on patient satisfaction and behavioural intention. Clin Govern Int J 18(3):238–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andaleeb SS, Kara A (2014) The structure and measures of service quality perceptions for multiple-encounter services: a study of hospitals in bangladesh. Int J Healthc Manag 7(2):92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bollen KA (2014) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bollen KA, Long JS (1993) Testing structural equation models, vol 154. SageGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Breckler SJ (1990) Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: cause for concern? Psychol Bull 107(2):260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng EW (2001) Sem being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious model testing for management development research. J Manag Dev 20(7):650–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    EzPATH SJ (1989) A Supplementary Module for SYSTAT and SYSGRAPH (computer program). SYSTATGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fornell C, Johnson MD et al (1996) The american customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. J Mark, pp 7–18Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lt Hu, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model Multidiscip J 6(1):1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jöreskog KG (1970) A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57(2):239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kazemi N, Ehsani P et al (2013a) Measuring hospital service quality and its influence on patient satisfaction: an empirical study using structural equation modeling. Manag Sci Lett 3(7):2125–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lei P, Jolibert A (2012) A three-model comparison of the relationship between quality, satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study of the Chinese healthcare system. BMC Health Serv Res 12(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ML W (2011) Questionnaire statistical analysis and practicełSPSS operation and application. Chongqing University Press, ChongqingGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res, 460–469Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ping Jr RA (2015) A note on estimating second-order interactions and quadratics in latent variables. In: Assessing the different roles of marketing theory and practice in the jaws of economic uncertainty, pp 304–304. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qin H, Prybutok VR et al (2014) UCPERF: An urgent care patient satisfaction instrument. Qual Manag J 21(3):11Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huo YB (2004) CSI model building and the GME comprehensive estimation research of its parameters. Master’s thesis, Doctoral Dissertation of Nanjing University of Science and EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu ZH (2015) Literature review of domestic and international research on patient satisfaction. Chin J Health Policy 8(4):60–66Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Nazam
    • 1
  • Muhammad Hashim
    • 2
  • Jamil Ahmad
    • 3
  • Waseem Ahmad
    • 1
  • Muhammad Tahir
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Business Management SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationNational Textile UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.School of EconomicsBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Business AdministrationFederal Urdu University of Arts, Science and TechnologyKarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations