# Researching Curriculum, Policy and Leadership in Mathematics Education

## Abstract

This chapter reviews research regarding the official mathematics curriculum and its enactment, the educational leadership to support this enactment, and the associated influential policy, such as national testing. It explores the interrelationships between inherent issues such as the potential influence of textbooks, curriculum equity, and the complexities of implementing numeracy across disciplines. Substantial research has led to the development of robust theoretical models to inform both future research and practical developments across a range of aspects of curriculum, policy and leadership. However, the seemingly diverse research perspectives are all drawn towards the teacher in the classroom as the critical context for further research.

## Keywords

Curriculum Policy Leadership## References

- ACARA—Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015a).
*The Australian Curriculum*(Version 7.5–21 May 2015). Retrieved July 4 2015 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/. - ACARA. (2015b).
*Australian Curriculum: Mathematics*(Version 7.5–21 May 2015). Retrieved July 4 2015 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/rationale. - ACARA. (2015c).
*Improving the Australian Curriculum*–8 May 2015. Retrieved July 4 2015 from http://www.acara.edu.au/news_media/acara_news/acara_news_2015_05.html#201505181. - ACARA. (2015d).
*National Assessment Program*. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/. - Anderson, J. (2014). Forging new opportunities for problem solving in Australian mathematics classrooms through the first national mathematics curriculum. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.),
*Mathematics curriculum in school education*(pp. 209–229). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_11. - Anderson, J., White, P., & Wong, M. (2012). Mathematics curriculum in the schooling years. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. McDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.),
*Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008-2011*(pp. 219–244). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ashhurst, C., & Gaffney, M. (2014). Connecting school and system perspectives in numeracy. In M. Gaffney & R. Faragher (Eds.),
*Leading improvements in student numeracy*(pp. 3–23). Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar - Atweh, B., & Goos, M. (2011). The Australian mathematics curriculum: A move forward or back to the future.
*Australian Journal of Education,**55*(3), 214–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Atweh, B., Miller, D., & Thornton, S. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Mathematics–World class or Déjà vu. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon, (Eds.),
*Engaging the Australian Curriculum Mathematics–Perspectives from the field*(pp. 1–18). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/onlinebooks. - Batiste, W., Walker, S., & Smeed, J. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions of school leadership and their perceptions of the implementation of the national curriculum.
*Leading and Managing,**21*(1), 69–85.Google Scholar - Bennison, A. (2015). Supporting teachers to embed numeracy across the curriculum: A sociocultural approach.
*ZDM,**47*(4), 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Branson, C. M. (2009).
*Leadership for an age of wisdom*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Branson, C. M. (2010).
*Leading educational change wisely*. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar - Chick, H., & Pierce, R. (2013). The statistical literacy needed to interpret school assessment data.
*Mathematics Teacher Education and Development,**15*(2), 5–26.Google Scholar - Callingham, R., Beswick, K., & Ferme, E. (2015). An initial exploration of teachers’ numeracy in the context of professional capital.
*ZDM,**47*, 549–560. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0666-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Debritz, C., & Horne, R. (2013). Guided inquiry as a model for curriculum resources in mathematics. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 763–766). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar - Ditchburn, D. (2012). A national Australian curriculum: In whose interests?
*Asia Pacific Journal of Education,**32*(3), 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Edmonds-Wathen, C. (2013). Great expectations: Teaching mathematics in English to indigenous language speaking students. In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 266–273). Melbourne: MERGA.Google Scholar - Education Review Office. (2011).
*Directions for Learning: The New Zealand curriculum principles, and teaching as inquiry*. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports. - Education Review Office. (2013).
*Mathematics in Years 4 to 8: Developing a responsive curriculum*. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/National-Reports. - Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions.
*ZDM,**45*, 633–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Faragher, R., Gaffney, M., & Skoss, M. (2014). Articulating purposes and practices in numeracy development. In M. Gaffney & R. Faragher (Eds.),
*Leading improvements in student numeracy*(pp. 167–180). Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar - Gaffney, M. (2012). Leadership capabilities for developing numeracy.
*Australian Educational Leader,**34*(2), 30–35.Google Scholar - Gaffney, M., Clarke, D., & Faragher, R. (2014a). The numeracy challenge: Student achievement, teacher quality, school leadership and system policy. In M. Gaffney & R. Faragher (Eds.),
*Leading improvements in student numeracy*(pp. 3–23). Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar - Gaffney, M., Faragher, R., & Clarke, D. (2014b). Embedding numeracy development. In M. Gaffney & R. Faragher (Eds.),
*Leading improvements in student numeracy*(pp. 181–199). Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar - Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2014). Curriculum intent, teacher professional development and student learning in numeracy. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.),
*Mathematics curriculum in school education*(pp. 473–492). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum.
*ZDM,**47*(4), 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Gerrard, J., Albright, J., Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., Farrell, L., Freebody, P., & Sullivan, P. (2013). Researching the creation of a national curriculum from systems to classrooms.
*Australian Journal of Education,**57*(1), 60–73. doi: 10.1177/0004944112471480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A professional development approach.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**23*(2), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012a). Auditing the numeracy demands of the Australian curriculum. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Chen, & S. F. Ng (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 314–321). Singapore: MERGA.Google Scholar - Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012b). Numeracy across the curriculum.
*Australian Mathematics Teacher,**68*(1), 3–7.Google Scholar - Hardy, I. (2015). A logic of enumeration: The nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia.
*Journal of Education Policy,**30*(3), 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hudson, P., Spooner-Lane, R., & Murray, M. (2013). Making mentoring explicit: Articulating pedagogical knowledge practices.
*School Leadership and Management,**33*(3), 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jorgensen, R. (2012). Curriculum leadership: Reforming and reshaping successful practice in remote and regional Indigenous education. In J. Dindyal, L. Chen, & S. Ng (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 370–377). Singapore: MERGA.Google Scholar - Jorgensen, R. (2015a). Successful mathematics lessons in remote communities: A case study of Balargo. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 317–324). Sunshine Coast, QLD: MERGA.Google Scholar - Jorgensen, R. (2015b). Mathematical success in culturally diverse mathematics classrooms. In S. Mukhopadhyay & B. Greer (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Eighth Mathematics Education and Society Conference*(pp. 670–683). Portland, OR: Ooligan Press.Google Scholar - Jorgensen, R., & Perso, T. (2012). Equity and the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.).
*Engaging the Australian Curriculum Mathematics—Perspectives from the field*(pp. 115–133). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/onlinebooks. - Kaur, B. (2014). Enactment of school mathematics curriculum in Singapore: Wither research!
*ZDM*,*46*, 829–836.Google Scholar - Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P., & Bristol, L. (Eds.). (2014).
*Changing education, changing practices*. Singapore: Springer Education.Google Scholar - Lamb, J., & Branson, C. (2015). Educational change leadership through a New Zonal Theory Lens: Using mathematics curriculum change as the example.
*Policy Futures in Education,**13*(8), 1010–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lange, T., & Meaney, T. (2014). It’s just as well kids don’t vote: The positioning of children through public discourse around national testing.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**26*, 377–397. doi: 10.1007/s13394-013-0094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Leder, G. (2012). Mathematics for all? The case for and against national testing. In S. J. Cho (Ed.),
*Intellectual and attitudinal challenges:**Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education*(pp. 189–207). Seoul, Korea: Springer Open. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_14. - Leung, F. K. S. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement?
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**26*(3), 579–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - McMurchy-Pilkington, C., Trinick, T., & Meaney, T. (2013). Mathematics curriculum development and indigenous language revitalisation: Contested spaces.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**25*(3), 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Meaney, T., Trinick, T., & Fairhall, U. (2013). One size does not fit all: Achieving equity in Maori mathematics classrooms.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,**44*(1), 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Miller, J., & Warren, E. (2014). Exploring ESL students’ understanding of mathematics in the early years: Factors that make a difference.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**26*(4), 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ministry of Education. (2007).
*New Zealand Curriculum**for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13.*Retrieved from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum. - Ministry of Education. (2011).
*Position paper: Assessment (schooling sector)*. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media Limited. Retrieved from http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Media/Files/Ministry-of-Education-Position-Paper-Assessment-Schooling-Sector-2011. - Özerk, K., & Whitehead, D. (2012). The impact of national standards assessment in New Zealand, and national testing protocols in Norway on indigenous schooling.
*International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education,**4*(3), 545–561.Google Scholar - Polesel, J., Dulfer, N., & Turnbull, M. (2012).
*The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families*—*A review of literature.*The Whitlam Institute: Sydney. Retrieved from http://whitlam.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/276191/High_Stakes_Testing_Literature_Review.pdf. - Polesel, J., Rice, S., & Dulfer, N. (2014). The impact of high-stakes testing on curriculum and pedagogy: A teacher perspective from Australia.
*Journal of Education Policy,**29*(5), 640–657. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.865082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rafiepour Gatabi, A., Stacey, K., & Gooya, Z. (2012). Investigating grade nine textbook problems for characteristics related to mathematical literacy.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**24*(4), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rampal, A., & Makar, K. (2012). Embedding authenticity and cultural relevance in the primary mathematics curriculum. In S. Cho (Ed.),
*Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress on Mathematical Education*(pp. 6616–6625). Seoul, Korea: ICME.Google Scholar - Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education.
*ZDM,**46*(5), 705–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Rost, J. C. (1993).
*Leadership for the twenty-first century*(2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar - Schmidt, W., McKnight, C., Houang, R., Wang, H., Wiley, D., Cogan, L., & Wolfe, R. (2002).
*Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning*. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar - Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics,**82*(2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sexton, M., & Downton, A. (2014). School mathematics leaders’ perceptions of successes and challenges of their leadership role within a mathematics improvement project. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 581–588). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar - Siemon, D., Bleckly, J., & Neal, D. (2012). Working with the big ideas in number and the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon, (Eds.). (2012).
*Engaging the Australian Curriculum Mathematics–Perspectives from the field*(pp. 19–45). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/onlinebooks. - Stephens, M. (2014). The Australian curriculum: Mathematics–How did it come about? What challenges does it present for teachers and for teaching mathematics? In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.),
*Mathematics curriculum in school education*(pp. 157–176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_9. - Sullivan, P. (2012). The Australian curriculum: Mathematics as an opportunity to support teachers and improve student learning. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.).
*Engaging the Australian Curriculum in Mathematics—Perspectives from the field*(pp. 175–189). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/onlinebooks. - Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., Farrell, L., & Gerrard, J. (2013). Processes and priorities in planning mathematics teaching.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**25*(4), 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Describing elements of mathematics lessons that accommodate diversity in student background. In M. Johnsen Joines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(pp. 257–265). Bergen, Norway: PME.Google Scholar - Thompson, D. R., & Huntley, M. A. (2014). Researching the enacted mathematics curriculum: Learning from various perspectives on enactment.
*ZDM,**46*(5), 701–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Walshaw, M., & Openshaw, R. (2011). Mathematics curriculum change: Parliamentary discussion over the past two decades.
*Curriculum Matters,**7*, 8–25.Google Scholar - Warren, E., & Quine, J. (2013). A holistic approach to supporting the learning of young Indigenous students: One case study.
*Australian Journal of Indigenous Education,**42*(1), 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Watson, J., & Neal, D. (2012). Preparing students for decision-making in the 21
^{st}century- Statistics and probability in the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon, (Eds.),*Engaging the Australian Curriculum Mathematics—Perspectives from the field*(pp. 89–18). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/onlinebooks. - Wyn, J., Turnbull, M., & Grimshaw. (2014).
*The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families*—*A qualitative study.*The Whitlam Institute: Sydney. Retrieved from http://whitlam.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/694199/The_experience_of_education_-_Qualitative_Study.pdf. - Yates, L. (2013). Revisiting curriculum, the numbers game and the inequality problem.
*Journal of Curriculum Studies,**45*(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zhang, Q., & Stephens, M. (2013). Utilising a construct of teacher capacity to examine national curriculum reform in mathematics.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal,**25*(4), 488–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Zmood, S. (2014). Fostering the promise of high achieving mathematics students through curriculum differentiation. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia*(pp. 677–684). Sydney: MERGA.Google Scholar