Advertisement

Building a Community of Ethical Practice Through PACE

  • Anne-Louise Semple
  • Michaela Baker
  • Alison Beale
  • Erin Corderoy
  • Laura Hammersley
  • Kate Lloyd
  • Kathryn McLachlan
  • Karolyn White
Chapter

Abstract

Ethical practice is a core principle of PACE. Partners must conform to the University’s ethical standards and values, and PACE activities must promote the well-being of people and the planet. Students are expected to engage in an ethical manner, and their activities might include research that requires ethics approval. Approaches to telling the PACE story must also be ethically sound. This chapter identifies the practical and epistemological imperatives behind collaborative efforts to foster ethical understanding and practice across the program. These attempts have raised questions such as ‘What constitutes an ethical activity?’ and ‘How might students be prepared for ethical complexities?’ It has led to pushing pedagogical and institutional boundaries, resulting in benefits for Macquarie students, the University as a whole, staff involved in PACE, and community-based partners. This chapter also acknowledges a number of complexities that pose challenges and further questions, as well as suggesting future directions for both practice and research.

Keywords

Human Research Ethic Committee Ethical Practice Unit Convenor Human Research Ethic Committee Trolley Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Argyris, M., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Australia. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). (2007). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. First published 1999, revised 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M. (2012a). Choosing ethical partners: one institution’s efforts to engage in ethical partnerships. In M. Campbell (Ed.) Collaborative education: Investing in the future – Proceedings of the 2012 ACEN National conference, (pp. 14–19). Melbourne, 29 October – 2 November, 2012. Retrieved from http://acen.edu.au/2012conference/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/142Choosing-ethical-partners.pdf.
  4. Baker, M. (2012b). The history of ethics and ethical theory. Macquarie University. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from YouTube via iLearn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v–5uZZmTJkudw.
  5. Baker, M., & Beale, A. (2013). Draft report. PACE and ethical partner choice: To Date Summary.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, M., & Mackaway, J. (2011). Draft discussion paper. Choosing ethical partners: challenges and recommendations.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, M., Beale, A., Hammersley, L., Lloyd, K., Semple, A.-L., & White, K. (2013). Ethical practice in learning through participation: Showcasing and evaluating the PACE ethical practice module. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(3), 195–207.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, M., Corderoy, E., Hammersley, L., Lloyd, K., McLachlan, K., Semple, A.-L., & White, K. (2014). Building capacity through ethical understanding and practice, Presented to the Australian Collaborative Education Network (ACEN) National conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 1–3 October 2014. Retrieved from http://acen.edu.au/2014Conference/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Building-capacity-through-ethical-understanding-and-practice.pdf.
  9. Boyd, M., & Wesemann, J. (Eds.). (2009). Broadening participation in undergraduate research: Fostering excellence and enhancing the impact. Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
  10. Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2009). Innovative practices in service – Learning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 147, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, M. (2011) Education for the ethical professional through work integrated learning, conference presentation at the ACEN NSW/ACT Forum, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia, 14 May.Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, M., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2011a). Ethical considerations and values development in work-integrated learning programs. In: K. E. Zegwaard (Ed.), New Zealand Association for Cooperative Education 2011 conference proceedings (pp. 11–14). Napier: New Zealand Association for Cooperative Education.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, M., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2011b). Values, ethics, and empowering the self through cooperative education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 12(3), 205–216.Google Scholar
  15. Crabtree, R. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations for international service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 15(1), 18–36.Google Scholar
  16. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect in virtues and vices. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.Google Scholar
  18. Freudenberg, B., Brimble, M., & Cameron, C. (2011). WIL and generic skill development: The development of business students’ generic skills through work- integrated learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 12(2), 79–93.Google Scholar
  19. Grunwald, A. (2001). The application of ethics to engineering and the engineer’s moral responsibility: Perspectives for a research agenda. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: HE Academy. Retrieved from www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/resources/publications/DevelopingUndergraduate_Final.pdf.
  21. Howitt, R. (personal communication, 2013). Former chair of the Faculty of Science Ethics Sub-committee.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91, 36–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahane, G. (2013). The armchair and the trolley: An argument for experimental ethics. Philosophical Studies, 162, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kallgren, C. A., & Tauber, R. T. (1996). Undergraduate research and the institutional review board: A mismatch or happy marriage? Teaching of Psychology, 23(1), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lang, C., & Buzwell, S. (2010). “Research skills are vital in all facets of life”: Research perceptions, expectations and experiences of undergraduate students. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy& A. Lichtenberg (Eds.) Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education, 33. pp. 431–440. Melbourne, 6–9 July, 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Mackaway, J., & Winchester-Seeto, T. (2011). Literature review: Ethics and ethical practice in Learning through Participation (LTP). Macquarie University Learning and Teaching Centre.Google Scholar
  27. Macquarie University. (2007). Macquarie University ethics statement. Retrieved from http://www.mq.edu.au/ethics/ethic-statement-final.html.
  28. Macquarie University. (2014a). PACE strategic plan 2014–16. Retrieved November 6, 2014, from http://mq.edu.au/about_us/offices_and_units/professional_and_community_engagement/pace_strategy/.
  29. Macquarie University. (2014b). PACE partnership criteria. Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://staff.mq.edu.au/teaching/professional_and_community_engagement/partnerships/partnership_criteria/.
  30. Macquarie University. (2014c). Brief overview of ethics for unit convenors in PACE units. Retrieved December 19, 2014, from http://staff.mq.edu.au/teaching/professional_and_community_engagement/forms_and_resources/.
  31. Maiter, S., Simich, L., Jacobson, N., & Wise, J. (2008). Reciprocity: An ethic for community-based participatory action research. Action Research, 6(3), 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moor, J. H. (2001). The future of computer ethics: You ain’t seen nothin’ yet! Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newton, L. H. (2003). Ethics and sustainability: Sustainable development and the moral life. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Orrell, J. (2004) Work-integrated learning programmes: Management and educational quality. In R. Carmichael (Ed.), Proceedings of the Australian University quality forum: Quality in a time of change (pp. 76–80). Adelaide, Australia July 7–9, 2004, Australian Universities Quality Agency.Google Scholar
  35. Robinson, L., Drewery, S., Ellershaw, J., Smith, J., Whittle, S., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2007). Research governance: Impeding both research and teaching? A survey of impact on undergraduate research opportunities. Medical Education, 41(8), 729–736.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, M., Brooks, S., Lichtenberg, A., McIlveen, P., Torjul, P., & Tyler, J. (2009). Career Development Learning: Maximising the contribution of work-integrated learning to the student experience. [Australian Learning and Teaching Council] Final Project Report June 2009.Google Scholar
  37. The Trolley Problem: A Thought Experiment that Tests our Morality. Relatively Interesting (2014). Retrieved November 14, 2014, from http://www.relativelyinteresting.com/the-trolley-problem-a-thought-experiment-that-tests-our-morality/.
  38. Tryon, E., Stoecker, R., Martin, A., Seblonka, K., Hilgendorf, A., & Nellis, M. (2008). The challenge of short-term service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning, 14(2), 16–26.Google Scholar
  39. Warburton, W. (personal communication, 2013). Convenor of PSY399.Google Scholar
  40. White, K., Baker, M., Beale, A., Hammersley, L., Lloyd, K., Paine, S., & Semple, A.-L. (2013). Fostering a research ethics culture: An innovative approach to ethics review of UG research. Presented to the Australasian Ethics (AEN) Network conference, Notre Dame University, Fremantle, Western Australia, November 27–29, 2013.Google Scholar
  41. Williams, G., & Chadwick, R. (2012). Responsibilities for healthcare. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolf, S. (1982). Moral saints. The Journal of Philosophy, 79(8), 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Louise Semple
    • 1
  • Michaela Baker
    • 2
  • Alison Beale
    • 2
  • Erin Corderoy
    • 2
  • Laura Hammersley
    • 3
  • Kate Lloyd
    • 3
  • Kathryn McLachlan
    • 4
  • Karolyn White
    • 5
  1. 1.PACE, Faculty of Science and EngineeringMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.PACE, Faculty of ArtsMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.PACEMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.PACE, Faculty of Human SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Research OfficeMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations