History and Overview of Endovascular Stroke Therapy



Acute ischemic stroke is the primary cause of acquired disability in adults and is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Following the introduction of intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular stroke therapy has hugely evolved over the past two decades. Although results of the 2013 randomized trials of endovascular stroke therapy were neutral, they were limited by insufficient imaging screening at enrollment, early-generation devices with less efficacy, and treatment delays. In the year of 2015, there has been great progress in this field with five randomized clinical trials all proving the safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment. Despite some differences in the details of eligibility requirements and processes, all five trials required several key factors for good functional recovery: (1) noninvasive imaging to prove proximal occlusion and to exclude large infarct core and (2) establishing a fast workflow to achieve effective reperfusion. The results indicate that modern thrombectomy devices can achieve faster and more effective reperfusion, so they lead to improved clinical outcomes compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone. There have not been major safety concerns, with a low rate of procedure-related complications and without an increase in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or death. Such advances in mechanical thrombectomy techniques hold promise in the global fight against ischemic stroke-related acquired disability and mortality. In this chapter, the recent evolutionary process of endovascular stroke therapy will be discussed in more detail.


Acute ischemic stroke Clot aspiration thrombectomy Endovascular stroke therapy Stent retriever thrombectomy Mechanical thrombectomy 


  1. 1.
    Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 and the GBD Stroke Experts Group, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383:245–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2364–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA. 1999;282:2003–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith WS, Sung G, Starkman S, et al. Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke. 2005;36:1432–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Smith WS, Sung G, Saver J, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: final results of the Multi MERCI trial. Stroke. 2008;39:1205–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators. The penumbra pivotal stroke trial: safety and effectiveness of a new generation of mechanical devices for clot removal in intracranial large vessel occlusive disease. Stroke. 2009;40:2761–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI, et al. Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1241–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R, et al. Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2012;380:1231–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators, et al. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:893–903.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J, MR RESCUE Investigators, et al. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:914–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M, SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:904–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qureshi AI, Abd-Allah F, Aleu A, et al. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014;7:56–75.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, MR CLEAN Investigators, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, EXTEND-IA Investigators, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, ESCAPE Trial Investigators, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, SWIFT PRIME Investigators, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, REVASCAT Trial Investigators, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim D, Ford GA, Kidwell CS, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute stroke in patients 80 and older: a comparison of results in patients younger than 80 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:159–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suzuki S, Kidwell CS, Starkman S, et al. Use of multimodal MRI and novel endovascular therapies in a patient ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke. 2005;36:e77–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hermier M, Nighoghossian N, Derex L, et al. Hypointense transcerebral veins at T2*-weighted MRI: a marker of hemorrhagic transformation risk in patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:1362–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wintermark M, Meuli R, Browaeys P, et al. Comparison of CT perfusion and angiography and MRI in selecting stroke patients for acute treatment. Neurology. 2007;68:694–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noser EA, Shaltoni HM, Hall CE, et al. Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke. 2005;36:292–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Qureshi AI, Siddiqui AM, Suri MF, et al. Aggressive mechanical clot disruption and low-dose intra-arterial third-generation thrombolytic agent for ischemic stroke: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1319–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Arnold M, Schroth G, Nedeltchev K, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 100 patients with acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002;33:1828–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Furlan AJ, Abou-Chebl A. The role of recombinant pro-urokinase (r-pro-UK) and intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: the PROACT trials. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. Curr Med Res Opin. 2002;18:s44–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nakano S, Iseda T, Yoneyama T, et al. Direct percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for acute middle cerebral artery trunk occlusion: an alternative option to intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke. 2002;33:2872–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahon BR, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL, et al. North American clinical experience with the EKOS MicroLysUS infusion catheter for the treatment of embolic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:534–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    IMS II Trial Investigators. The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II study. Stroke. 2007;38:2127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berlis A, Lutsep H, Barnwell S, et al. Mechanical thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke with endovascular photoacoustic recanalization. Stroke. 2004;35:1112–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gobin YP, Starkman S, Duckwiler GR, et al. MERCI 1: a phase 1 study of mechanical embolus removal in cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2004;35:2848–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Menon BK, Hill MD, Eesa M, et al. Initial experience with the Penumbra Stroke System for recanalization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:261–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grunwald IQ, Walter S, Papanagiotou P, et al. Revascularization in acute ischaemic stroke using the penumbra system: the first single center experience. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16:1210–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kulcsár Z, Bonvin C, Pereira VM, et al. Penumbra system: a novel mechanical thrombectomy device for large-vessel occlusions in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:628–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Starck EE, McDermott JC, Crummy AB, et al. Percutaneous aspiration thromboembolectomy. Radiology. 1985;156:61–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lutsep HL, Clark WM, Nesbit GM, et al. Intraarterial suction thrombectomy in acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:783–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kang DH, Hwang YH, Kim YS, et al. Direct thrombus retrieval using the reperfusion catheter of the penumbra system: forced-suction thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:283–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Turk AS, Spiotta A, Frei D, et al. Initial clinical experience with the ADAPT technique: a direct aspiration first pass technique for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:231–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Castaño C, Serena J, Dávalos A. Use of the new solitaire (TM) AB device for mechanical thrombectomy when Merci clot retriever has failed to remove the clot. A case report. Interv Neuroradiol. 2009;15:209–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Castaño C, Dorado L, Guerrero C, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire AB device in large artery occlusions of the anterior circulation: a pilot study. Stroke. 2010;41:1836–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Park H, Hwang GJ, Jin SC, et al. A retrieval thrombectomy technique with the Solitaire stent in a large cerebral artery occlusion. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153:1625–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mendonça N, Flores A, Pagola J, et al. Trevo system: single-center experience with a novel mechanical thrombectomy device. J Neuroimaging. 2013;23:7–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mendonça N, Flores A, Pagola J, et al. Trevo versus Solitaire a head-to-head comparison between two heavy weights of clot retrieval. J Neuroimaging. 2014;24:167–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    San Román L, Obach V, Blasco J, et al. Single-center experience of cerebral artery thrombectomy using the TREVO device in 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:1657–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ebinger M, Winter B, Wendt M, et al. Effect of the use of ambulance-based thrombolysis on time to thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1622–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery and RadiologyKyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Daegu-Gyeongbuk Cardiocerebrovascular CenterDaeguRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations