Advertisement

Empowering Vocational Math Teachers by Using Digital Learning Material (DLM) with Workplace Assignments

  • Diana Zwart
  • Johannes E. H. Van Luit
  • Sui Lin Goei
Chapter
Part of the Gaming Media and Social Effects book series (GMSE)

Abstract

Digital Learning Material (DLM) are fast becoming a key instrument in teaching. The focus on E-learning systems with Digital Learning Material (DLM) is mostly on the medium and resources, instead of on the role of teachers. But like students, teachers also need to professionalize their digital competencies. And rather than describing how the teacher should take up his/her online role, teachers can also be trained by using online materials and experiencing DLM themselves. Therefore the first objective of this study is to design an e-learning system with DLM to train seven vocational math teachers. The second objective is to investigate the aspects of the learning activities in terms of “learning engagement,” “teachers’ self learning process” and “professional learning to enhance teachers’ knowledge.” In this research, teachers participating in this project had a 6 week online training in an e-learning system with DLM. After this, teachers completed the questionnaires on these aspects. Teachers were satisfied with the components “learning engagement” and “teachers’ self learning process.” They specifically appreciated the domain-specific literature and the online moderation of the expert teacher. With regard to the component “professional learning,” teachers did not collaborate and only three teachers abstract and detach information from its original context and applied to it in new contexts by their questions and contributions in the forum discussions. For other teachers the “space to act and arrange” seemed too broadly. Future study should pay more attention to the development of assignments that require specific tasks in collaboration between the teachers.

Keywords

Digital Learning Material (DLM) Workplace learning Collaborative learning Mathematics Vocational education 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R., Reder, L.M., Simon, H.A.: Situated learning and education. Educ. Res. 25, 5–11 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akkerman, S.F., Bakker, A.: Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocat. Learn. 5, 153–173 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baartman, L.K., De Bruijn, E.: Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educ. Res. Rev. 6, 125–134 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berliner, D.C.: The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. J. Teach. Educ. 56, 205–213 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Chen, J.L.: The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Comput. Educ. 57, 1501–1511 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christensen, R., Knezek, G.: Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, pp. 349–365. Springer, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compton, L.K.L.: Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 22, 73–99 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Driscoll, M.P.: Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Pearson Education, Boston, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Schiefele, U.: Motivation. In: Eisenberg, N. (ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology, pp. 1017–1095. Wiley, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engeström, Y.: Learning by expanding. In: An Activity-Theoretical Approach by Developmental Research, Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki (1987)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engeström, Y., Sannino, A.: Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educ. Res. Rev. 5, 1–24 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eraut, M.: Developing professional knowledge and competence. Routledge Falmer, London/New York (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gray, B.: Informal learning in an online community of practice. J. Distance Educ. 19(1), 20–35 (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hargreaves, E.: The validity of collaborative assessment for learning. Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract 14(2), 185–199 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Illeris, K.: Transfer of learning in the learning society: how can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted, and how can the gap between learning inside and outside schools be bridged. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 28, 137–148 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kahveci, M., Imamoglu, Y.: Interactive learning in mathematics education: Review of recent literature. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach. 26, 137–153 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., Reiss, K.: Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learn. Instr. 19, 149–170 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwakman, K.: Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teach. Teach. Educ. 19, 149–170 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, L.T., Hung, J.C.: Effects of blended e-learning: a case study in higher education tax learning setting. Human-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 5, 1–15 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McKenney, S.: Designing and researching technology-enhanced learning for the zone of proximal implementation. Res. Learn. Technol. 21, 1–9 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meirink, J.A., Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N.: A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract. 13, 145–164 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meirink, J.A., Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N., Bergen, C.M.: How do teachers learn in the workplace? An examination of teacher learning activities. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 32, 209–224 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
    Montague, M., Rinaldi, C.: Classroom dynamics and children at risk: a follow up. Learn. Disabil. Q. 25, 75–83 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Noroozi, O., Biemans, H.J.A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., Chizari, M.: Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in multidisciplinary CSCL environments. Learn. Instr. 25, 1–12 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roscoe, R.D., Chi, M.T.H.: Tutoring learning: the role of explaining and responding to questions. Instr. Sci. 36, 321–350 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schön, D.A.: Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1987)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smits, A.E.H.: Ontwerp en implementatie van de masteropleiding special educational needs via e-learning (Design and implementation of the master special educational needs through e-learning). Ipskamp, Enschede, The Netherlands (2012)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Paas, F.G.W.C.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10, 251–296 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Thoonen, E.E.J., Sleegers, P.J.C., Peetsma, T.T.D., Oort, F.J.: Can teachers motivate students to learn. Educ. Stud. 37, 345–360 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Turner, E.E., Drake, C., McDuffie, A.M., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T.G., Foote, M.Q.: Promoting equity in mathematics teacher preparation: a framework for advancing teacher learning of children’s multiple mathematics knowledge bases. J. Math. Teacher Educ. 15, 67–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Kirschner, P.A.: Ten Steps to Complex Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey (2007)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, M., Eccles, J.S.: Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Dev. 83, 877–895 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wanner, T., Palmer, E.: Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Comput. Educ. 88, 354–369 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Zwart
    • 1
  • Johannes E. H. Van Luit
    • 2
  • Sui Lin Goei
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Human Movement and EducationWindesheim University of Applied SciencesZwolleThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Special Needs EducationUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of the Behavioural and Movement SciencesVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations