Advertisement

Innovation and Transformation of Initial Teacher Education: Employer and Graduate Perspectives

  • Sally KnipeEmail author
  • Rebecca Miles
  • Stephanie Garoni
Chapter

Abstract

Teacher education courses at Australian universities tend to qualify graduates to teach in age-related contexts of early childhood/primary/secondary. For some considerable time these longstanding structural school divisions have been by-passed in terms of teacher employment. Shortages of teachers, in certain subject disciplines, for example languages, science (in particular physics and chemistry) and mathematics teachers, have resulted in schools employing staff to teach in subjects or grades for which they are not qualified. More recently, the development of various school models and structures has created demand for teachers with generic skills able to teach across a wide age range. The intent of this chapter is to present perspectives from graduate teachers with a F-12 qualification ('F' refers to Foundation that signifies the first year of school), and their school supervisors, on the benefits of employing a teacher qualified to teach across the primary and secondary sectors. The findings from this study indicate that a F-12 qualified teacher has flexibility in terms of employment opportunities and has broader curriculum understanding and pedagogical experiences that enhance teacher performance, something seen as a major benefit to both employers and graduates. This chapter argues that innovation in course design will not come from teacher registration institutes or the school sectors. For pragmatic reasons, the leadership that universities can provide in modifying the long-standing models of teacher education programs is of significance.

Keywords

Teacher Education Teacher Preparation Qualified Teacher Primary Teacher Secondary Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge that the collection of data for this research project was supported by Strategic Initiates Funding, La Trobe University.

References

  1. Aspland, T. (2006). Changing patterns of teacher education in Australia. Education Research and Perspectives, 33(2), 140–162.Google Scholar
  2. Auchmuty, J. (Chair) (1980). Report of the national inquiry into teacher education. Canberra AGPS.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2015). National professional standards for teachers. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/initial-teacher-education-program-accreditation.html. Melbourne: AITSL.
  4. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2014). Initial teacher education: Data report 2014. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/initial-teacher-education-resources/ite-data-report-2014.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2015.
  5. Australian Secondary Principals Association Incorporated. (2007). Survey – Beginning teachers. http://www.aspa.asn.au/images/surveys/2007beginningteachersreport.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2009.
  6. Baker, L. J. (1975). Governance of the Australian colleges of advanced education. Queensland, Australia: Darling Downes Institute of Advanced Education.Google Scholar
  7. Barratt, R. (1998). Shaping middle schooling in Australia: A report of the national middle schooling project. Canberra, Australia: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, C., & Proctor, H. (2014). A history of Australian schooling. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Carrington, V. (2004). Mid-term review; the middle years of schooling. Curriculum Perspectives, 24(1), 30–41.Google Scholar
  10. Chadbourne, R. (2001). Middle schooling for the middle years; what might the jury be considering? Victoria, Australia: Australian Education Union.Google Scholar
  11. Cumming, J., & Cormack, P. (1996). From alienation to engagement; opportunities for reform in the middle years of schooling. Canberra, Australia: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2012). Summary of the 2012 full year higher education student statistics. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  13. Hatton, N. (1996). Changing initial teacher education: Limitations to innovation in the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 21(2), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haynie, D. (2003). Contexts of risk? Explaining the link between girls’ pubertal development and their delinquency involvement [electronic version]. Social Forces, 82(1), 355–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollenstein, T., & Logheed, J. (2013). Beyond storm and stress: Typicality, transitions, timing and temperament to account for adolescent change [electronic version]. American Psychologist, 68(6), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyams, B. K. (1979). Teacher preparation in Australia: A history of its development from 1850 to 1950. Hawthorn, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  17. Knight, J., Lingard, B., & Bartlett, L. (1994). Reforming teacher education policy under labour governments in Australia 1989–03. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(4), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knipe, S. (2012). Crossing the primary and secondary school divide in teacher preparation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(5). Accessed http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n5.6.
  19. Knipe, S. (2015). A generic teacher education program that meets contemporary schools’ needs. In S. Groundwater-Smith & N. Mockler (Eds.), Big fish, little fish; teaching and learning in the middle years (pp. 223–235). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Knipe, S., & Johnston, K. (2007). Problematising middle schooling for middle schools and middle years education. In S. Knipe (Ed.), Middle years of schooling; reframing adolescence (pp. 3–20). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Mayer, D. (2014). Forty years of teacher education in Australia: 1974–2014. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 40(5), 461–473.Google Scholar
  22. Parkes, R.J. (2013). Challenges for curriculum leadership in contemporary teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(7). Accessed http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/atje.2013v38n7.8.
  23. Polesel, J., & Teese, R. (1998). The ‘Colleges’ growth & diversity in the non-university tertiary studies sector (1965–74). Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training & Youth Affairs, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Productivity Commission. (2012). Schools workforce. Research report. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  25. Reid, J. (2010, November 8). [AARE Presidential Address 2010]. Doing it by numbers? Educational research and teacher education. Speech presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Reid, J. (2011). A practice turn for teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schools Council. (1992). In the middle schooling for young adolescents. Project Paper no. 7 Compulsory Years of School Project. Canberra, Australia: NBEET, AGPS.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, D., Deer, C., Meyenn, B., & Taylor, A. (1995). Reform, restructuring & innovation in teacher education down under. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (47th Washington, DC, February 12–15 1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations