Goodbye Mr Chips, Hello Dr Phil?

Chapter

Abstract

The call for the disciplining of troubled and troubling students is a constant theme in western education texts, although approaches to dealing with disruptive student behaviour have changed over time. We see shifts from overtly punitive responses where the mechanisms of control take the form of corporal punishment, detention, in-school and out-of-school suspension, and exclusion, to more benign pastoral and psychological approaches in the late twentieth century. More recently, aberrant student behaviour has been described and treated as pathological dysfunction according to symptomologies catalogued in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. While these changes may seem profound, they share a common thread. The problem resides within the student and that dysfunctional individual should be controlled. The school, the teacher, the organisation of curriculum, the form of pedagogy and assessment, and institutional culture all slip from the diagnostic frame. Analysis has been slight and has followed institutional imperatives. This chapter calls for a rigorous interrogation that helps us to overcome the reduction of discipline to control. As an educational concept discipline speaks to the relational connections between the student, school and learning.

Keywords

Grand Unify Theory Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Student Behaviour Inclusive Education School Discipline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Education Union. (2007). Beginning teacher survey: Results and report. Melbourne: Australian Education Union.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Balson, M. (1982). Understanding classroom behaviour. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  7. Bartenbach, B. (1983, May 30). End of strap will give school bullies free reign. The Age.Google Scholar
  8. Barton, L. (1988). The politics of special educational needs. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Z. (2004). Wasted lives: Modernity and its outcasts. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Bauman, Z. (2013). Does the richness of the few benefit us all? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Bauman, Z., & Mazzeo, R. (2012). On education: Conversations with Riccardo Mazzeo. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Bennett, C., & Harris, J. (1982). Suspensions and expulsions of male and black students. Urban Education, 16(4), 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bibby, T. (2011). Education – An ‘impossible profession’? Psychoanalytic explorations of learning and classrooms. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Biklen, D. (1985). Achieving the complete school: Strategies for effective mainstreaming. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Britzman, D. P. (2011). Freud and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Canter, L., & Canter, M. (1976). Assertive discipline: A take-charge approach for today’s educator. Seal Beach: Canter and Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Challinger, D. (1987). Crime at school: Seminar proceedings, 2–4 June. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  18. Charles, C. M., & Barr, K. B. (1985). Building classroom discipline: From models to practice. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Colliver, R. (1983). Severely disruptive behavior in secondary schools: A review of causes and school responses. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Connell, R. W. (1994). Schools and social justice. Leichhardt: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cooper, P. (2008). Like alligators bobbing for poodles? A critical discussion of education, ADHD and the biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Philosophy in Education, 42, 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corcoran, T. (Ed.). (2014). Psychology in education: Critical theory practice. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  24. Department for Education. (2013a, January). Schools, pupils, and their characteristics. Statistical First Release, SFR 21/2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/207670/Main_text-_SFR21_2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.
  25. Department for Education. (2013b). Permanent and fixed term exclusions from schools and exclusion appeals in England, 2011/12. Statistical First Release, SFR 29/2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224893/SFR29-2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.
  26. Dettman, H. W. (1972). Discipline in secondary schools in Western Australia. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. London: Free Press/Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Donnelly, K. (2009, November 16). New teachers say classroom violence is their biggest concern. The Courier-Mail. http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/new-teachers-say-classroom-violence-their-biggest-concern/story-e6frerdf-1225798648663. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.
  29. Dreikurs, R., & Cassel, P. (1974). Discipline without tears. New York: Hawthorn Books.Google Scholar
  30. Duncan, A. (2014, January 8). Rethinking school discipline. Media Release, US State Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/rethinking-school-discipline. Accessed 29 Apr 2014.
  31. Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2009). The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Education Department of Victoria. (1983). Memorandum to principals and school councils – Regulation XVI. Melbourne: Education Department of Victoria.Google Scholar
  33. Elingson, P. (1983, August 1). Crisis in the classroom. The Age.Google Scholar
  34. Fields, B. (2005, November). School discipline coverage in Australian newspapers: impact on public perceptions, educational decisions and policy. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Parramatta, New South Wales.Google Scholar
  35. Frances, A. (2014, April 13). No child left undiagnosed, The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/allen-frances/no-child-left-undiagnosed_b_5139060.html. Accessed 14 June 2015.
  36. Freiberg, H. J. (1999). Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  37. Furedi, F. (2003). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Furlong, J. (1991). Disaffected pupils: Reconstructing the sociological perspective. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12(3), 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (1999). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform, and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Glasser, W. (1965). Reality therapy: A new approach to psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  41. Glasser, W. (1969). Schools without failure. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  42. Glasser, W. (1986). Control theory in the classroom. New York: Perennial Library.Google Scholar
  43. Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1978). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  44. Greenberg, G. (2013). The book of woe: The DSM and the unmaking of psychiatry. London: Scribe.Google Scholar
  45. Harwood, V., & Allan, J. (2014). Psychopathology at school: Theorizing mental disorders in education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Schools. (1978). Behavioural units. London: Department of Education and Science.Google Scholar
  47. House of Commons Education Committee. (2011). Behaviour and discipline in schools. London: UK Parliament.Google Scholar
  48. Hyde, N., & Robson, G. (1984). A study of student suspensions. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  49. Knight, T. (1975). Locked-in or locked-out: The powerlessness of the student role. School determinants of delinquent behaviour. In L. F. Claydon (Ed.), The urban school. Melbourne: Pitman.Google Scholar
  50. Knight, T. (1985). An apprenticeship in democracy. The Australian Teacher, 11, 5–7.Google Scholar
  51. Kutchins, H., & Kirk, S. A. (1997). Making us crazy. DSM: The psychiatric bible and the creation of mental disorders. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Lewis, J. (1993). Integration in Victorian schools: Radical social policy or old wine? In R. Slee (Ed.), Is there a desk with my name on it? (pp. 9–26). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lieberman, J. A. (2015). Shrinks: The untold story of psychiatry. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
  54. Lingard, B. (2015). Think tanks, ‘policy experts’ and ‘ideas for’ education policy making in Australia. Australian Education Researcher, 43(1), 15–33.Google Scholar
  55. Locke, J. (1693). Some thoughts concerning education. London: Black Swan in Paternoster-Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ministry of Education, Victoria. (1984). Integration in victorian education (Collins report). Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
  57. Mongon, D. (1988). Behaviour units, ‘maladjustment’ and student control. In R. Slee (Ed.), Discipline and schools: A curriculum perspective (pp. 183–198). Melbourne: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  58. Motte, J. et al. (1984, August 7). Teachers back call for corporal punishment. The Age. Google Scholar
  59. Parsons, C. (2009). Strategic alternatives to exclusion from school. Trentham: Stoke on Trent.Google Scholar
  60. Polk, K. (1984). The new marginal youth. Crime and Delinquency, 30, 462–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Polk, K., & Schafer, W. E. (1972). Schools and delinquency. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: Revolutionizing education from the ground up. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  64. Rogers, W. A. (1990). You know the fair rule: Strategies for making the hard job of discipline in school easier. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  65. Rose, S. P. R. (2005). The 21st-century brain: Explaining, mending and manipulating the mind. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  66. Rose, N. (2007). Politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rose, H., & Rose, S. P. R. (2014). Genes, cells and brains: The promethean promises of the new biology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  68. Said, E. W. (2000). Travelling theory reconsidered. In E. W. Said (Ed.), Reflections on exile and other literary and cultural essays (pp. 436–452). London: Granta Publications.Google Scholar
  69. Saul, R. (2015). ADHD does not exist. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  70. Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. London: Yale University.Google Scholar
  71. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  72. Sennett, R. (2012). Together: The rituals, pleasures, and politics of cooperation. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Signoret, S. (1978). Nostalgia isn’t what it used to be. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  74. Slattery, L. (1991, October 3). State school suspension list trebles in 7 years. The Age.Google Scholar
  75. Slee, R. (1986). Integration, the disruptive student and suspension. The Urban Review, 18(2), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Slee, R. (1987). The evolution and impact of the new regulations and guidelines for discipline in Victorian Education Ministry schools. Master of Education thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora.Google Scholar
  77. Slee, R. (1988). Goodbye Mr. Chips, hello Dirty Harry? Prospects, 1(1), 14–16.Google Scholar
  78. Slee, R. (1994). Changing theories and practices of discipline. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  79. Slee, R. (1998). High reliability organisations and low reliability students: The politics of recognition. In R. Slee, G. Weiner, & S. Tomlinson (Eds.), School effectiveness for whom? (pp. 101–114). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  80. Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Sullivan, A. M., Johnson, B., Owens, L., & Conway, R. (2014). Punish them or engage them? Teachers’ views of unproductive student behaviours in the classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tomlinson, S. (1981). Educational subnormality: A study in decision-making. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  83. Tomlinson, S. (1982). A sociology of special education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  84. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Geneva: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  85. Whitaker, R. (2002). Mad in America: Bad science, bad medicine, and the enduring mistreatment of the mentally ill. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
  86. Whitaker, R. (2010). Anatomy of an epidemic: Magic bullets, psychiatric drugs, and the astonishing rise of mental illness in America. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  87. Wu, S., Pink, W. T., Crain, R. L., & Moles, O. (1982). Student suspension: A critical reappraisal. The Urban Review, 14, 245–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Youdell, D. (2011). School trouble: Identity, power and politics in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations