Advertisement

Effects of Light Intensity and Mycorrhiza Association on the Growth Performance of Capsicum annum

  • Anisah MohammedEmail author
  • Mohamad Amir Shah Yusop
Conference paper

Abstract

The study was conducted to examine the effects of light intensity and mycorrhiza inoculation toward the growth and yield performance of Capsicum annum. Split-plot design was employed as an experimental design consists of 13 treatments including control with three replications. Four different levels of shade percentage: 0, 30, 50, 70 % and four different rates of mycorrhiza: 0, 50, 60, 70 g were used in this study. Shading was designed as main plot and mycorrhiza as subplot. Data of plant height, size of leaves, number of fruits, fresh weight of fruits, fresh weight of roots, and dry weight of roots were collected. 70 % shading and 60 g mycorrhiza gave the highest plant height with 40.70 cm. 50 % shading and 40 g mycorrhiza was highest in leaf size with 14.50 cm. Plant grown under 30 % shading and 60 g mycorrhiza was the highest in fruit number and fresh fruit weight. Application of 50 % shading and 60 g mycorrhiza contribute to the highest in root weight. Shading was contributed to the significant effect on growth and yield response of Capsicum annum.

Keywords

Capsicum annum Mycorrhiza Shading 

References

  1. Ali KA, Ertan SK, Cuneyt C, Kudret K (2004) Bulb yield and some plant characters of Summer Snowflake (Leucojum aestivum L.) under shading as affected by GA, and NAA at different concentration. J Agron 3(4):296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosland PW, Votava EJ (1999) Peppers: vegetable and spices capsicums. CABI Publishing CAB International Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Cagras S, Sari N, Ortas I (2000) The effects of vesicular Arbuscular mycorrhizae on the plant growth and nutrient uptake of cucumber. Turk J Agric For 24:571–578Google Scholar
  4. Devokta A, Kumar J (2010) Effect of different light levels on the growth traits and yield of Centell asiatica. Middle-East J Scientific Res 5(4):226–230Google Scholar
  5. Diaz-Perer JC (2013) Bell Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) crop as affected by shade level; microenvironment, plant growth, leaf gas exchange and leaf mineral nutrient concentration. Hortic Sci 48(2):175–182Google Scholar
  6. Gent MPN (2007) Effect of degree and duration of shade on quality of greenhouse tomato. Horticultural Science 42(3):514–520Google Scholar
  7. Godbold DL, Sharrock R (2003) Mycorrhizas: In trees, crop and soil fertility. CABI Publishing, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaya SP, Umesh BK (2012) Study of arbuscular mycorrhiza associated with important medicinal plants in suburban area of Mumbai. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal 2(2):116–127Google Scholar
  9. Koide RT, Mosse B (2004) A history of research on Arbuscular mycorrhiza. Mycorrhiza 14:145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional group. Springer, Berlin. Germany, 48–54Google Scholar
  11. Marin-Lopez J, Gonzalez A, Perez-Alfocea XY, Egea-Galibert C, Fernandez JA (2011) Effect of shade on quality of greenhouse peppers. Acta Horticulturae 893:895–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsumoto J, Hiroyuki M, Izumi W (2000) Whole plant carbon gain of an endangered herbaceous species Aster kantoensis and the influence of shading by an Alien Grass Eragrostis curvula in its Gravelly Floodplain Habitat. Ann Bot 86:789–797Google Scholar
  13. Menzel CM, Simpson DR (1988) Effect of continuous shading on growth, flowering and nutrient uptake of passionfruit. Horticultural Science 35:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ortas I (2010) Effect of mycorrhiza application on the growth application on plant growth and nutrient uptake in cucumber production under field conditions. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8(1):116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Riadh I, Thouraya R, Imen T, Hager J (2013) Effect of different shading levels on growth and yield parameters of a Hot Pepper (Capsicum annum L.) Cultivar ‘Beldi’ grown in Tunisia. Global Science books 7(1):32–35Google Scholar
  16. Schoch PG (1972) Effect of shading on structural characteristics of the leaf and yield of fruit in Capsicum annum L. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 97:461–464Google Scholar
  17. Schwarz D, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Venema GH (2010) Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegatbles to abiotic stresses; Theral stresses, water stresses and organic pollutants. Sci Hortic 127:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strack D, Thomas F, Betinna H (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: Biological, chemical and molecular aspects. J Chem Ecol 29(9):1955–1979Google Scholar
  19. Syed Kamaruddin SW (1983) The effect of shade on growth of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and ease of rooting of its cuttings. MARDI Res. Bull 11(2):187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wahyu WBT (2005) Bertanam cabai pada musim hujan. Agro Media Pustaka. IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilawan, K. (1998). Effect of shading on the growth and yield of a local hot pepper variety. AVRDC-ARC. Research Report ThailandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Plantation & AgrotechnologyUniversiti Teknologi MARAJengkaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations