ISFRAM 2015 pp 31-43 | Cite as
Flood Disaster Management in Malaysia: Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Review
Abstract
Flood is a natural weather-related disaster frequently occurring in Malaysia. One of the greatest challenges that Malaysia faces today is recognizing the magnitude of risks posed by flooding. The public, private and NGOs should deliberate the amount of investments required to reduce the flood risk, including making appropriate emergency preparations, strengthening the existing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and finding new solution for minimizing risk related to flood disaster. The current existing SOPs indicate that there is still lack of holistic flood risk management system to minimize this problem. The country should be committed to establish a national policy on flood risk management that requires effective, economical, sustainable, and consistent management of flood risk to people, properties, and communities. Risk management has been established as a well-defined procedure for handling risks due to natural, environmental, and man-made hazards. A risk management can be applied at every level of the action: planning, design, and operation level. A holistic flood risk management system will evaluate the potential risk before, during, and after the flood disaster. The paper reviews the current SOPs implemented by the agencies dealing with flood disaster in Malaysia.
Keywords
Flood Standard operating procedures (SOP) Flood risk managementNotes
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the FRGS Flood Disaster Grant, 600-RMI/FRGS DIS 5/3 (6/2015).
References
- 1.Othman M (2014) COBIT principles to govern flood management. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 9:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Chan NW (2012) Impact of disasters and disasters risk management in Malaysia: the case of floods in Sawada. In: Sawada Y, Oum S (eds), Economic and welfare impacts of disasters in east Asia and policy responses. ERIA Research Project Report 2011-8, Jakarta: ERIA, pp 503–551Google Scholar
- 3.Khalid MS, Shafiai S (2014) Flood disaster management in Malaysia: an evaluation of the effectiveness flood delivery system. Int J Soc Sci Human 5(4):398Google Scholar
- 4.Zakaria N, Mustaffa CS (2014) Source credibility, risk communication and well-being: a conceptual framework. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 155:178–183Google Scholar
- 5.Tingsanchali T (2012) Urban flood disaster management. Procedia Eng 32:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Abdullah MH, Tussin AM (2014) Tropical cyclone, rough seas and severe weather monitoring and early warning system in Malaysia. JMA/WMO Workshop on effective tropical cyclone warning in Southeast AsiaGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hamin Z, Othman MB, Elias Z (2013) Floating on a legislative framework in flood management in Malaysia: lessons from the United Kingdom. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 101(2013):277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Zaharah Elias ZH (2013) Sustainable management of flood risks in Malaysia: some lesson from the legislation in England and Wales. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 491–497Google Scholar
- 9.ISDR (2011) Strategic framework 2025. Work Programme 2012–2015Google Scholar