Advertisement

A Metacognitive Approach to Financial Literacy

  • Alessandro AntoniettiEmail author
  • Andrea Borsetto
  • Paola Iannello
Chapter

Abstract

An emerging body of literature in the study of financial literacy highlights that information plays a little role in many financial decisions. Being informed about financial topics does not seem the key aspect to make efficient choices. Recent studies indicated that what is really crucial in order to prompt adequate attitudes towards financial issues is the way human mind processes information. Deliberation, intuition, and heuristics are three different modes of thinking which can be activated when individuals reason about financial issues. None of them is absolutely better than the others since they are qualitatively different types of information processing. Rather, the effectiveness of a financial decision depends on the individual ability to select the specific mode of thinking which best suits the situation at hand. Metacognition might be considered as a way to help people promoting their ability to identify the relevant strategies to be applied in a specific situation and to self-regulate their own behaviour in order to flexibly manage the three thinking systems and make effective financial decisions.

Keywords

Financial literacy Financial education Cognition Metacognition Dual models Intuition Heuristics 

References

  1. Baldi, P. L., Iannello, P., Riva, S., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Socially biased decisions are associated to individual differences in cognitive reflection. Studia Psychologica, 55, 265–271.Google Scholar
  2. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. In G. Constantinides, R. Stulz, & M. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (pp. 1053–1128). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Bernheim, B. D., & Garrett, D. M. (2003). The effects of financial education in the workplace: Evidence from a survey of households. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1487–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernheim, B. D., Garrett, D. M., & Maki, D. M. (2001). Education and saving: The long-term effects of high school financial curriculum mandates. Journal of Public Economics, 80, 435–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berti, A. E., & Bombi, S. (1988). The child’s construction of economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., & Sturdevant, T. (1987). Teaching thinking and problem solving. In J. B. Baron & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 162–181). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  8. Carpena, F., Cole, S., Shapiro, J., & Zia, B. (2011). Unpacking the causal chain of financial literacy. Working Paper N.5798, World Bank Policy Research.Google Scholar
  9. Colombo, B., Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2010). Metacognitive knowledge of decision-making: An explorative study. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognitive research (pp. 445–472). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danes, S. M., & Haberman, H. R. (2007). Teen financial knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior: A gendered view. Financial Counseling and Planning, 18, 48–60.Google Scholar
  12. Danes, S. M., Hudelstone-Casas, C., & Boyce, L. (1999). Financial planning curriculum for teen: Impact evaluation. Financial Counseling and Planning, 10, 25–37.Google Scholar
  13. de Meza, D., Irlenbusch, B., Reyniers, D. (2008). Financial capability: A behavioural economics perspective. London, UK: The Financial Services Authority.Google Scholar
  14. De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dismore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement pan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 815–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition. Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Thinking twice. Two minds in one brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings. The intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  26. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.). (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gilbert, D. T. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 167–184). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blick. The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
  31. Gross, K., Ingham, J., & Matasar, R. (2005). Strong palliative, but not a panacea: Results of an experiment teaching students about financial literacy. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 35, 7–26.Google Scholar
  32. Hofer, B. K., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Iannello, P. (2010). Mindreading processes in strategic decision making. When intuition makes a difference. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller e.K.Google Scholar
  35. Iannello, P., & Antonietti, A. (2008). Reciprocity in financial decision-making: Intuitive and analytical mind-reading strategies. International Review of Economics, 55, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iannello, P., Perucca, V., Riva, S., Antonietti, A., & Pravettoni, G. (2015). What do physicians believe about the way decisions are made? A pilot study on metacognitive knowledge in the medical context. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 11, 691–706, doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i4.979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53, 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107–118.Google Scholar
  41. Legrenzi, P., & Cervellin, R. (2011). I principi dell’educazione finanziaria non sono solo finanziari. In E. Castrovilli (Ed.), Educazione finanziaria a scuola (pp. 111–118). Milano: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.Google Scholar
  42. Lusardi, A. (2008). Household saving behavior: The role of financial literacy, information, and financial education programs. NBER Working Paper 1382.Google Scholar
  43. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. (2007). Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Business Economics, 42, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. (2008). Planning and financial literacy. How do women fare? American Economic Review, 98, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lyons, A. C., Chang, Y., & Scherpf, E. (2006). Translating financial education into behavior change for low-income populations. Financial Counseling and Planning Journal, 17, 27–45.Google Scholar
  46. Macchi, L., Over, D., & Viale, R. (Eds.) (2012). Dual process theories of human thought: The debate. Mind and Society, 11 (1).Google Scholar
  47. Mandell, L., & Klein, L. S. (2007). Motivation and financial literacy. Financial Services Review, 16, 106–116.Google Scholar
  48. Mastrobuoni, G. (2011). The role of information for retirement behavior: Evidence based on the social security statement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 913–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. OECD. (2005). Improving financial literacy: Analysis of issues and policies. OECD Centre: Paris, France.Google Scholar
  50. Pelham, B. W., & Neter, E. (1995). The effect of motivation on judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peng, T.-C. M., Bartholomae, S., Fox, J. J., & Cravener, G. (2007). The impact of personal finance education delivered in high school and college courses. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roa García, M. J. (2013). Financial education and behavioral finance: New insights into the role of information in financial decisions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Serra, M. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Effective implementation of metacognition. In J. Metcalfe, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 278–298). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Shefrin, H. (2002). Behavioral decision making, forecasting, game theory, and role-play. International Journal of Forecasting, 18, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Varcoe, K. P., Martin, A., Devitto, Z., & Go, C. (2005). Using a financial education curriculum for teens. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 16, 63–71.Google Scholar
  61. Vaughan, F. E. (1990). Varieties of intuitive experience. In W. H. Agor (Ed.), Intuition in organizations (pp. 40–61). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Walstad, W. B., Rebeck, K., & MacDonald, R. A. (2010). The effects of financial education on the financial knowledge of high school students. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44, 336–357.Google Scholar
  63. Xu, L., & Zia, B. (2012). Financial literacy around the world. An overview of the evidence with practical suggestions for the way forward. The World Bank, Development Research Group, Finance and Private Sector Development Team.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Antonietti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Borsetto
    • 1
  • Paola Iannello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations