Advertisement

Labor Market Distortion with Discouraged Worker Effects in Korea

  • Jaewon LimEmail author
Chapter
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 25)

Abstract

This paper examines skill mismatch problems in regional labor markets due to discouraged worker effects in South Korea. In Seoul metropolitan areas (SMAs), supply surplus for highly educated workforce among the youth is evident and causes serious distortion not only in SMA but also in national labor market. On the contrary, the shortage of low-skilled workers in Korea due to overinvestment in human capital forces out establishments to other countries with cheaper labor costs. Proposed regression models in this study specify how the share of discouraged workers in a regional labor market can be determined by various factors such as demographic structures, labor market conditions, and migration pattern with regional and/or temporal fixed effects. The regional-temporal fixed effect model found to be the most important factor in explaining how these factors determine the relative stock of discouraged workers in a region. Among the variables describing regional labor market conditions, only two, labor force participation rate of young cohort (aged between 15 and 29) and that of highly educated population (college graduate or higher), directly influenced regional labor market distortion by determining the regional stock of discouraged workers. With more active participation of these groups in a labor market, the overall discouraged worker effect in a region reduces, leading to enhanced labor market efficiency. Migration pattern does not play any role on regional discouraged workers. This indicates the limited role of interregional migration on factor price equalization among regional labor markets in Korea.

Keywords

Regional labor market Spatial mismatch Skilled workforce Labor force participation 

References

  1. Bal, F., and P. Nijkamp. 1997. Exogenous and endogenous spatial growth models, TI Discussion Paper 97-022/3. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, A., and S.E. Turner. 2013. Expanding enrollments and contracting state budgets the effect of the great recession on higher education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 650(1): 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R.J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. 1995. Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Basker, E. 2002. Education, job search and migration. University of Missouri-Columbia Working Paper, (02–16).Google Scholar
  5. Berry, C.R., and E.L. Glaeser. 2005. The divergence of human capital levels across cities. Papers in Regional Science 84(3): 407–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard, O.J., and P. Diamond. 1994. Ranking, unemployment duration, and wages. The Review of Economic Studies 61(3): 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87(1): 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, K.B., L.H. Summers, C.C. Holt, R.E. Hall, and M.N. Baily. 1979. Labor market dynamics and unemployment: A reconsideration. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 13–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coibion, O., and Y. Gorodnichenko. 2013. Is the phillips curve alive and well after all? Inflation expectations and the missing disinflation. (No. w19598). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, D.L., and M.E. Kahn. 2000. Power couples: Changes in the locational choice of the college educated, 1940–1990. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4): 1287–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David, H., N. Maestas, K.J. Mullen, and A. Strand. 2015. Does delay cause decay? The effect of administrative decision time on the labor force participation and earnings of disability applicants. (No. w20840). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Elhorst, J.P. 2000. The mystery of regional unemployment differentials: A survey of theoretical and empirical explanations. Research report no 00C06, SOM. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  13. Elsby, M.W., B. Hosijn, and A. Sahin. 2013. On the importance of the participation margin for labor market fluctuations. Unpublished manuscript. Available at SSRN: http://nyfedeconomists.org/sahin/40483_EHS.pdf.
  14. Faggian, A., P. McCann, and S. Sheppard. 2006. An analysis of ethnic differences in UK graduate migration behaviour. Annals of Regional Science 40(2): 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faggian, A., P. McCann, and S. Sheppard. 2007. Some evidence that women are more mobile than Men: Gender differences in UK graduate migration behaviour. Journal of Regional Science 47(3): 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finegan. TA. 1978. The measurement, behavior, and classification of discouraged workers, National commission on employment and unemployment statistics. Washington DC: U.S. Govt. Print Office.Google Scholar
  17. Flinn, C., and J.J. Heckman. 1983. The likelihood function for the multistate-multiepisode model in ‘models for the analysis of labor force dynamics’. Advances in Econometrics 2: 225–231.Google Scholar
  18. Ghayad, R., and W.T. Dickens. 2012. What can we learn by disaggregating the unemployment-vacancy relationship?. FRB of Boston Public Policy Brief, (12–3).Google Scholar
  19. Gönül, F. 1992. New evidence on whether unemployment and out of the labor force are distinct states. Journal of Human Resources 27(2): 329–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon, R.H., and A.L. Bovenberg. 1996. Why is capital so immobile internationally? Possible explanations and implications for capital income taxation. American Economic Review 86(5): 1057–1075.Google Scholar
  21. Gottlieb, P.D., and G. Joseph. 2006. College-to-work migration of technology graduates and holders of doctorates within the United States. Journal of Regional Science 46(4): 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenwood, M. 1975. Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13: 397–433.Google Scholar
  23. Haugen, S.E. 2009. Measures of labor underutilization from the current population survey, BLS Working Paper 424. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved March 2009, from http://www.bls.gov/ore/pdf/ec090020.pdf.
  24. Jones, S.R., and W.C. Riddell. 1999. The measurement of unemployment: An empirical approach. Econometrica 67(1): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaldor, N. 1970. The case for regional policies. Scottish Journal of Political Economics 17(3): 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kodrzycki, Y. 2001. Migration of recent college graduates: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. New England Economic Review 2001: 13–34.Google Scholar
  27. Kroft, K., F. Lange, M.J. Notowidigdo, and L.F. Katz. 2014. Long-term unemployment and the great recession: the role of composition, duration dependence, and non-participation. (No. w20273). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  28. Kubo, Y., and H. Kim. 1996. Human capital, imported technology and economic growth: a comparative study of Korea and Japan, Discussion paper 695, Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
  29. Kuch, P., and S. Sharur. 1978. Added- and discouraged-worker effects in Canada, 1953–1974. Canadian Journal of Economics 11(1): 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. López‐Bazo, E., T.D. Barrio, and M. Artis. 2002. The regional distribution of Spanish unemployment: A spatial analysis. Papers in Regional Science 81(3): 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas, R.E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22(3): 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathur, V. 1999. Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly Econ 13(4): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nijkamp, P., and J. Poot. 1998. Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Annals of Regional Science 32(1): 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okun, A.M., W. Fellner, and A. Greenspan. 1973. Upward mobility in a high-pressure economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 4(1): 207–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ondeck, C. 1978. Discouraged workers’ link to jobless rate reaffirmed. Monthly Labor Review 101(10): 40–42.Google Scholar
  36. Romer, P. 1989. Endogenous technological change, No. w3210. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schachter J.P., R.S. Franklin, and M.J. Perry. 2003. Migration and geographic mobility in metropolitan and non–metropolitan America: 1995–2000. Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR–12.Google Scholar
  38. Schwartz, A. 1973. Interpreting the effect of distance on migration. The Journal of Political Economy 81(5): 1153–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sjaastad, L. 1962. The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy 70: 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sorrentino, C. 1995. International unemployment indicators, 1983–1993. Monthly Labor Review 118: 31.Google Scholar
  41. Tachibanaki, T., and K. Sakurai. 1991. Labour supply and unemployment in Japan. European Economic Review 35(8): 1575–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Dijk, J., H. Folmer, H.W. Herzog Jr., and A.M. Schlottmann. 1989. Migration and labour market adjustment. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waldorf, B.S. 2009. Is human capital accumulation a self-propelling process? Comparing educational attainment levels of movers and stayers. Annals of Regional Science 43(2): 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Policy & Leadership, Greenspun College of Urban AffairsUniversity of NevadaLas VegasUSA

Personalised recommendations