Advertisement

Putting Sensory Back into Voluntary Motor Control

  • Stephen H. ScottEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics book series (ICCN)

Abstract

Optimal feedback control provides a framework for interpreting why we generate variable, but successful movements. Notable is the importance of sensory feedback for voluntary control. We have explored the sophistication of corrective responses of humans by applying small disturbances to the limb as subjects perform goal-directed actions. We found subjects flexibly modify their corrective responses to consider the size and shape of a behavioural goal, and even avoid obstacles present in the environment. These task-dependent corrective responses elicit changes in muscle activity ~60 ms after the disturbance, implicating the role of a transcortical feedback pathway in the responses. Neurophysiological studies in non-human primates illustrate that neural activity in primary motor cortex responds to mechanical disturbances in as little as 20 ms and is quickly modulated based on the behavioural goal. These studies highlight that feedback processing during voluntary motor action parallels the many sophisticated features associated with motor planning and feed-forward control.

Keywords

Voluntary motor control Optimal feedback control Rapid motor corrections 

References

  1. 1.
    Crevecoeur, F., Scott, S.H.: Beyond muscle stiffness: importance of state estimation to account for rapid motor corrections. PLOS Comp. Bio. 10, e1003869 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Todorov, E., Jordan, M.I.: Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1226–1235 (2002)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scott, S.H.: Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of motor control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 532–546 (2004)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammond, P.H.: The influence of prior instruction to the subject on an apparently involuntary neuro-muscular response. J. Physiol. 132, 17-8P (1956)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pruszynski, J.A., Scott, S.H.: Optimal feedback control and the long-latency stretch response. Exp. Brain Res. 218, 341–359 (2012)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nashed, J.Y., Crevecoeur, F., Scott, S.H.: Influence of the behavioural goal and environmental obstacles on rapid feedback responses. J. Neurophys. 108, 999–1009 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nashed, J.Y., Crevecoeur, F., Scott, S.H.: Rapid motor decisions to avoid obstacles or select alternate goals: evidence for online cost-to-go. J. Neurosci. 34, 1769–1780 (2014)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scott, S.H.: The computational and neural basis of voluntary motor control and planning. Trends Cog. Sci. 16, 541–549 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omrani, M., Pruszynski, J.A., Murnaghan, C.D., Scott, S.H.: Perturbation-evoked responses in primary motor cortex are modulated by behavioural context. J. Neurophys. 112, 2985–3000 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GSK-CIHR Chair in Neuroscience, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Department of Biomedical and Molecular SciencesQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations