Developing a Better Understanding of Complexity in Education

An Introduction to the Various Research Projects
  • Cok Bakker
  • Nicolina Montesano Montessori
Chapter

Abstract

For reasons which have to do with the phenomenon itself, complexity in teaching situations is difficult to research. Exactly because teaching situations can be that complicated, it is a hard job to get a grip on them.

Keywords

Teacher Training Practical Wisdom Religious Education Novice Teacher Citizenship Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1961). The crisis in education. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Between past and future. Six exercises in political thought (pp. 173–196). London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition. Chicago, IL / London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, C., & Wassink, H. (2015). Leraren en het goede leren. Normatieve professionalisering in het onderwijs. Utrecht: HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Reviews Psychology, 52, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z. (1998). Leven met veranderlijkheid, verscheidenheid en onzekerheid. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in the era of measurement. London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Goed onderwijs en de cultuur van het meten: Ethiek, politiek en democratie. Den Haag: Boom Lemma.Google Scholar
  10. Biesta, G. J. J. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). Het prachtige risico van onderwijs. Culemborg: Uitgeverij Phronese.Google Scholar
  12. De Jong, H., Tops, P., & Van der Land, M. (2013). Prikken in Praktijken. Over de ontwikkeling van praktijkonderzoek (L. Vroomans, Ed.). Den Haag: Boom Lemma.Google Scholar
  13. De Lange, R., Schuman, H., & Montesano Montessori, N. (2011). Praktijkgericht onderzoek voor reflectieve professionals. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
  14. Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2014). Education plus. Seattle, WA: Collaborative Impact SPC.Google Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (2014). Turbulent and mighty continent. What future for Europe? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hermans, H. J. M., & Konopka-Hermans, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermsen, J. J. (2014). Kairos. Een nieuwe bevlogenheid (5th ed.). Amsterdam/ Antwerpen: De Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
  18. Isaacs, W. (1993). Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning. Organizational Dynamics, 22(2), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. New York, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  20. Jessop, B., Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (Eds.). (2008). Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Kant, I. (Rev. Ed.). (1956). Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meinen Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self. Problem and process in human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. (2008). Personal praxis. In S. Kemmis & T. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis. Challenges of education (pp. 15–35). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2002), Niveaus in reflectie: naar maatwerk in begeleiding. VELON Tijdschrift voor lerarenopleiders, 23(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  25. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Book 2 Affective domain. New York, NY/London: Longman.Google Scholar
  26. Kunneman, H. (1996). Normatieve professionaliteit: een appel. Tijdschrift Sociale Interventie, 5(3), 107–112.Google Scholar
  27. Kunneman, H. (2015). Voorbij het dikke-ik. Bouwstenen voor een kritisch humanisme (5th ed.). Amsterdam: B.V. Uitgeverij SWP.Google Scholar
  28. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Mouffe, C. (1993/2005). The return of the political. London/New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Leenders, H., & Veugelers, W. (2004). Waardevormend onderwijs en burgerschap: Een pleidooi voor een kritisch-democratisch burgerschap. Pedagogiek, 24, 361–375.Google Scholar
  32. Plato. (2012). De ideale staat. Politea. Amsterdam: Singel Uitgeverijen.Google Scholar
  33. Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension (Rev. Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Ricoeur, P. (1995). Oneself as another. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sayer, A. (2014). Why we can’t afford the rich. Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  37. Senge, P., & Scharmer, O. (2001). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Smedslund, J. (2012). The bricoleur model of psychological practice. Theory & Psychology, 22(5), 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spencer, L., & Spencer, S. (1993). Competence at work. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Swieringa, J., & Wierdsma, A. F. M. (1990). Op weg naar een lerende organisatie. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff Management.Google Scholar
  41. Van Ewijk, H. (2013). Conceptuele inleiding: ontvouwing van normatieve professionalisering. In H. Van Ewijk & H. Kunneman (Eds.), Praktijken van normatieve professionalisering (pp. 19–71). Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
  42. Van Ewijk, H., & Kunneman, H. (Eds.). Praktijken van normatieve professionalisering. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
  43. Van Manen, M. (2012, 1991). The tact of teaching. The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. London & Ontario: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  44. Van Montfort, C., Michels, A., & Van Dooren, W. (2012). Stille ideologie. Onderstromen in beleid en bestuur. Den Haag: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  45. Vermaak, H. (2009). Plezier beleven aan taaie vraagstukken. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cok Bakker
    • 1
  • Nicolina Montesano Montessori
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiteit UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands
  2. 2.Hogeschool UtrechtHU University of Applied Sciences UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations