Advertisement

Epistemic Practices and Scientific Practices in Science Education

  • María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre
  • Beatriz Crujeiras
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education book series (NDMS)

Abstract

There is a growing consensus in considering that learning science involves students’ participation in the epistemic goals of science (Duschl, 2008; Kelly, 2008) or that, as Duschl (2008) proposes, science education should balance conceptual, epistemic and social learning goals.

Keywords

Science Education Scientific Practice Prevent Tooth Decay Computational Thinking Epistemic Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achieve. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, P., Bricker, L., Tzou, C., Lee, T., & Van Horne, K. (2012). Exploring the science framework: Engaging learners in scientific practices related to obtaining, evaluating and communicating information. The Science Teacher, 79(8), 31–36.Google Scholar
  3. Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. W., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(in press). doi: 10.1002/tea.21257
  4. Bybee, R. (2011). Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms. Understanding a framework for K-12 science education. The Science Teacher, 78, 34–40.Google Scholar
  5. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crujeiras, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2015, 31 August–4 September). Students’ engagement in planning an investigation about tooth decay: Epistemic operations in the chemistry laboratory. Paper presented at the ESERA conference, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  7. Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duschl, R. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Planning and carrying out investigations: An entry to learning and to teacher professional development around NGSS science and engineering practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s40594-014-0012-6
  9. Duschl, R. A., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2012). Epistemic foundations for conceptual change. In S. M. Carver & J. Shrager (Eds.), The journey from child to scientist: Integrating cognitive development and the education sciences (pp. 245–262). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99–117). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, G. J. (2016). Methodological considerations for interactional perspectives on epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 393–408). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Monteira, S. F., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2016). The practice of using evidence in kindergarten: The role of purposeful observation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53 (in press). doi: 10.1002/tea.21259
  14. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  15. Osborne, J. (2011). Science teaching methods: A rationale for practices. School Science Review, 93(343), 93–103.Google Scholar
  16. Osborne, J. (2014). Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 579–599). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reiser, B. J., Berland, L. K., & Kenyon, L. (2012). Engaging students in the scientific practices of explanation and argumentation. Understanding a framework for K-12 Education. Science and Children, 49(8), 8–13.Google Scholar
  19. Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre
  • Beatriz Crujeiras

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations