Advertisement

Integrating Graduate Attributes Into Islamic Higher Education Curricula in Aceh, Indonesia

  • Habiburrahim
  • Janice Orrell
  • Robert Conway
Part of the Higher Education Horizons book series (HEHO)

Abstract

One of the most significant current discussions in higher education is refining the concept of graduate attributes or generic skills in undergraduate student curricula. In most universities in Australia and the UK, there is an established set of graduate attributes that undergraduate students are expected to acquire as a result of their course of studies (Barrie, 2007; Chalmers & Partridge, 2013). However, in the context of Islamic higher education, especially in Aceh, Indonesia, graduate attributes are often a novel concept. What have been referred to as graduate attributes in Australian and UK universities are largely not identified within curriculum intentions in Islamic universities in Aceh. This chapter is motivated by the implementation of new policy developments in Indonesia for higher education in Aceh that call for greater integration of Islamic values, general education and attention to local community needs. In coming to some practical solutions regarding the integration of graduate attributes into the curriculum, this paper draws upon a study that sought the views and lived educational experiences of students and teachers in an English Education Department in an Islamic university in Aceh.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aceh strategic planning 2012-2017. In Ministry of Education & Culture and Provincial Coordinating Team for Aceh Education Development (Eds.), Terms of reference ACDP-036: Education policy research in Aceh province. Aceh: The Education Sector Analytical and Capacity Development Partnership (ACDP). Retrieved from http://www.ipac.ca/documents/callforexports-july27.pdf
  2. Aspinall, E. (2005). The Helsinki agreement: A more promising basis for peace in Aceh? Policy Studies, 20. Washington D. C.: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  3. Ausburg, T (2006). Becoming interdisciplinary: An introduction to interdisciplinary studies (2nd ed.). New York: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, R. (1994). The limits of competence. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development 23(3), 247–260. doi:  10.1080/0729436042000235382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrie, S. (2005). Rethinking generic graduate attributes. HERDSA News, 27(1), 1–35Google Scholar
  7. Barrie, S. (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. doi:  10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrie, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439–458. doi:  10.1080/03075070701476100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmers, D., & Partridge, L. (2013). Teaching graduate attributes and academic skills. In L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (Eds.), University teaching in focus: A learning-centred approach. Oxon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Defillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (2006). The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 307–324. doi:  10.1002/job.4030150403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gow, K., & McDonald, P. (2000). Attributes required of graduates for the future workplace. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 52(3), 373–396. doi:  10.1080/13636820000200126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gow, K., & Wood, D. (1996). Virtually a reality. Australian Training Review, 20, 26–27.Google Scholar
  13. Hashim, C. N., & Langgulung, H. (2008). Islamic religious curriculum in Muslim countries: The experiences of Indonesia and Malaysia. Bulletin of Education & Research, 30(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  14. Al Hassan, I. B. M. (2012). Multidisciplinary curriculum to teaching English Language in Sudanese institutions (a case study). Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess, F. M. (2010). A market for knowledge? In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karseth, B. (2004). Curriculum changes and moral issues in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 24(8), 638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laird, T. F. N., & Garver, A. K. (2010). The effect of teaching general education courses on deep approaches to learning: How disciplinary context matters. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 248–265. doi:  10.1007/s11162-009-9154-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T. C., & Weinland, T. P. (1998). Development of theme-based, interdisciplinary, integrated curriculum: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 312–319. doi:  10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17426.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lubis M. A., Mustapha, R., & Lampoh, A. A. (2009). Integrated Islamic education in Brunei Darussalam: Philosophical issues and challenges. Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 1(2), 51–60. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/files/365/11489990.pdf (freely available)
  21. Ministry of National Education Decree No. 045/U/2002.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of National Education and Ministry of Religious Affairs (2010). Strategic Plan for Education 2010–2014. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.Google Scholar
  23. Nicholls, D. (1995). A straw thrown up to show which way the wind blows. Capability, 1(4), 41–48.Google Scholar
  24. Nurdin, R., Aswar, C., Yahya, A., Zain, A., & Nur, A. (2010). UIN Ar-Raniry manual handbook for undergraduate program. Banda Aceh: Ar-Raniry Press.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, B. (2010). Benchmarking with a focus on graduate employability: Why, how and with what? Paper presented at the work integrated learning conference – Responding to challenges: Proceedings of the 2010 ACEN National conference, Perth, September 29 – October 1, 2010.Google Scholar
  26. Primary goals of the English education department. (1997). State institute for Islamic studies of Ar-Raniry, Darussalam Banda Aceh.Google Scholar
  27. Qanun Aceh Nomor 5 Tahun 2008. (2008). Tentang penyelenggaraan pendidikan.Google Scholar
  28. Qanun Nomor 23 Tahun 2002. (2002). Tentang penyelenggaraan pendidikan.Google Scholar
  29. Repko, A. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Tilaar, T. A. M. (2002). Peran perguruan tinggi di daerah dalam otonomi daerah. In I. Syarief & D. Murtadlo (Eds.), Pendidikan untuk masyarakat Indonesia baru. Jakarta: GrasindoGoogle Scholar
  31. Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S. (1996). The interdisciplinary teacher's handbook: Integrated teaching across the curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  32. UUPA (2006). Undang undang nomor 11 tahun 2006 tentang pemerintah Aceh (No. 11/2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Habiburrahim
    • 1
  • Janice Orrell
    • 2
  • Robert Conway
    • 3
  1. 1.UIN Ar-Raniry Darussalam – Banda AcehIndonesia
  2. 2.School of EducationFlinders UniversityAustralia
  3. 3.School of EducationFlinders UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations