Ninth Graders’ Use of and Trust in Wikipedia, Textbooks, and Digital Resources From Textbook Publishers

  • Ove Edvard Hatlevik


Recent research has examined the role of information and communication technology (ICT) in learning and teaching (Balanskat & Gertsch, 2010; Binkley et al., 2012; Fraillon, Ainley, Schulz, Friedman, & Gebhardt, 2014; Law, 2009). Both commercial and non-profit actors have developed specific learning resources for school, teachers, and students.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., & Freeman, C. (2007). National assessment program: ICT literacy years 6 & 10 report 2005. Australia: MCEETYA.Google Scholar
  2. Balanskat, A., & Gerthsch, C. A. (2010). Digital skills working group. Review of national curricula and assessing digital competence for students and teachers: Findings from 7 countries. Brussels: European Schoolnet.Google Scholar
  3. Binkley, M., Erstad, E., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blikstad-Balas, M. (2015). “You get what you need”: A study of students’ attitudes towards using Wikipedia when doing school assignments. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–15.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58, 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042–1053. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Compaine, B. M. (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Darnon, C., Harackiewicz, J. M., & Butera, F. (2007). Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning within a mastery vs. performance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Educational Testing Service (ETS). (2001). Digital transformation. A framework for ICT literacy. A report of the International ICT Literacy Panel. Retrieved from _Technology_Literacy/ictreport.pdf
  12. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erstad, O. (2008). Changing assessment practice and the role of IT. In I. J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 181–194). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2002). Towards a knowledge-based Europe. The European Union and the information society. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe’s schools. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved from Scholar
  16. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks (Report EUR25351EN). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  17. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGICOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (Report EUR26036EN). Luxembourg: JRC Scientific and Policy Reports.Google Scholar
  18. Fraillon, J., & Ainley, J. (2011). The IEA International Study of Computer and Information Literacy (ICILS) (Vol. 33). Hamburg: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  19. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital ageThe IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
  20. Frisbie, D. A. (1988). Reliability of scores from teacher-made tests. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 7(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frønes, I. (2002). Digitale skiller: utfordringer og strategier. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  22. Frønes, T. S., & Narvhus, E. K. (2011) Students on the internet: Digital reading in PISA 2009 (Elever på nett – Digital lesing i PISA 2009). Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  23. Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011) Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of internet literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2011). From digital divide to digital opportunities? A critical perspective on the digital divide in South African schools (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  25. Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hatlevik, O. E. (2012). Analyzing factors influencing students’ productive use of computers: A structural equation model. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(4), 11–28. Retrieved from Scholar
  27. Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hatlevik, O. E., & Gudmundsdottir G. B. (2013). An emerging digital divide in urban school children’s information literacy: Challenging equity in the Norwegian school system. First Monday, 18(4). doi:10.5210/fm.v18i4.4232
  29. Hatlevik, O. E., Tømte, K., Skaug, J. H., & Ottestad, G. (2011). Monitor 2010 – Discussion about ICT at school. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education.Google Scholar
  30. Hatlevik, O. E., Throndsen, I., & Ottestad, G. (2015). Predictors of digital comp. in 7th grade: Students’ motivation, family background, and culture for professional development in schools. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 31(3), 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kerlinger, J. M., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Survey research. Foundations of Behavioural Research, 599–619.Google Scholar
  32. Kim, H. S., Kil, H. J., & Shin, A. (2014). An analysis of variables affecting the ICT literacy level of Korean elementary school students. Computers & Education, 77, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krumsvik, R. (2011). Digital competence in Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbilding, 1, 39–51.Google Scholar
  34. Kuhlmeier, H. A., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students’ Internet skills. Computers & Education, 49, 460–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Law, N. (2009). Curriculum and staff development for ICT in Education. In T. Plomp, R. E. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology. Policies and practices in education. Charlotte, NC: IEA.Google Scholar
  36. Matzat, U., & Sadowski, B. (2012). Does the “do-it-yourself approach” reduce digital inequality? Evidence of self-learning of digital skills. The Information Society, 28(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McAlpine, H. (2002). A summary of methods of items analysis. Bluepaper Number 2. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  38. Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs (MCEECDYA). (2010). National assessment program. ICT literacy years 6 and 10 report 2008. Retrieved from
  39. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (1999). Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide (US Department of Commerce). Washington, DC: NTIA. Retrieved from
  40. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (2000). Falling through the net, toward digital inclusion (US Department of Commerce). Washington, DC: NTIA. Retrieved from
  41. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for basic skills. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.Google Scholar
  42. OECD. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. (2010). Are new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pedró, F. (2007). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on digital technologies and learning. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy (Digital kompetanse), 4, 43–60.Google Scholar
  45. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  46. Søby, M. (2013). Learning to be: Developing and understanding digital competence. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 3, 134–138.Google Scholar
  47. Van Deursen, A. (2012). Internet skill-related problems in accessing online health information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 81(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Deursen, A., Van Dijk, J., & Peters, O. (2011). Rethinking Internet skills. The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics, 39, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7(7). Retrieved from
  50. Zhang, G., Wang, Q., & Kolodinsky, J. (2010). The digital divide in Internet information searching: A double-hurdle model analysis of household data from Vermont. First Monday, 15(11). Retrieved from
  51. Zhong, Z. J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 56, 736–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ove Edvard Hatlevik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations