Teaching Research Interviews

  • Eric Fuchs
  • Bronislaw Czarnocha


This project is based on a study assessing the effectiveness of teaching research interviews in mathematics with urban high school students. The subjects of the study were public high school students enrolled in the Mathematics and Science Partnership in New York City (MSPinNYC), a multi-year program funded by the National Science Foundation. The methodology was geared to a target population consisting of the lowest third performing in Math A Regents exams.


Mathematical Thinking Equal Sign Pedagogical Implication Conceptual Error Student Misconception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ambrose, R., Nicol, C., Crespo, S., Jacobs, V., Moyer, P., & Haydar, H. (2003). Exploring the use of teaching research interviews in teacher development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 293–315.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, J., Cochran-Smith, M., Moll, L., Richert, A., Zeichner, K., LePage, P., Darling-Hammond, L., Duffy, H., & McDonald, M. (2005). Teaching diverse learners. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 232–276). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, A. W. (1982). Treating students’ misconceptions. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 38, 11–13.Google Scholar
  4. Bell. A. W. (1982). Diagnosing students’ misconceptions. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 38, 6–10.Google Scholar
  5. Borasi, R. (1994). Capitalizing on errors as “Springboards for Inquiry”: A teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 166–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 835–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heirdsfield, A. M. (2002). The interview in mathematics education: The case of mental computation. Proceedings Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education 2002, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  9. Hiebert J., & Ball, D. L. (2005). From best research to what works: Improving the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 1–33). Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute, National Press Club.Google Scholar
  10. Hunting, R. P. (1997). Clinical interview methods in mathematics education research and practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lerch, C. (2002, November 21–24). The unfossilization of concepts in adult learning. Paper presented at the Lilly Conference on College Teaching, Oxford, OH.Google Scholar
  12. OIRA. (2008). ENRL_0015, ENRL_0030 and ENRL_0032. New York, NY: CUNY Office of Institutional Research and Assessment. Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Renwick, E. M. (1932). Children’s misconception concerning the symbol for mathematical equality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2(2), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children mathematics 4–15: Learning from errors and misconceptions. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  15. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Swan, M. (2001). Dealing with misconceptions in mathematics. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 147–165). London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  17. Swinson, K. (1992). Writing activities as strategies for knowledge construction and the identifications of misconceptions in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and Science Education in SouthEast Asia, 15(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
  18. Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as a culturally and adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R. Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 21–42). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  19. Walbert, D. (2001). The clinical interview: LearnNC. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Education. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Fuchs
    • 1
  • Bronislaw Czarnocha
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Master of Science in EducationMetropolitan College of New YorkNew York CityUSA
  2. 2.Mathematics DepartmentEugenio Maria de Hostos Community CollegeNew York CityUSA
  3. 3.City University of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations