Creative Intelligence in the 21st Century pp 107-117 | Cite as
Facilitating Creative Thinking in the 21st Century
When Constraints Help
Chapter
Abstract
Progress often depends on creative thinking and innovation. Be they transformative, paradigm-shifting breakthroughs, or smaller, incremental improvements that may have less of an impact on their own but still contribute to progress, creative ideas can help solve problems and lead to domain-specific innovations or broader, transdisciplinary advancements.
Keywords
21st Century Creative Thinking Cognitive Diversity Creative Solution Scorpion Venom
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ambrose, D. (2009). Expanding visions of creative intelligence: An interdisciplinary exploration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- Ambrose, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2012). How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boden, M. (1991). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Crichton, M. (1995). The lost world (pp. 311–312). New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Cowen, T. (2002). Creative destruction: How globalization is changing the world’s cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- De Brabandere, L., & Iny, A. (2013). Thinking in new boxes: Five essential steps to spark the next big idea. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
- Downes, L. (2009, April 21). Take 1 recipe, mince, reduce, serve. The New York Times.Google Scholar
- Finke, R. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Haught, C. (2015). The role of constraints in creative sentence production. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haught-Tromp, C. (in press). Constraints facilitate creativity in greeting card messages.Google Scholar
- Haught-Tromp, C. (in press). Creativity and constraint: Friends, not foes. In J. Baer & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to creativity and reason in cognitive development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Haught-Tromp, C. (in press). The Green eggs and ham hypothesis: How constraints facilitate creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar
- Haught-Tromp, C., & Stokes, P. D. (in press). Constraints, competency and creativity in the classroom. In R. Leikin & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and giftedness: Interdisciplinary perspectives from mathematics and beyond. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer Science and Business.Google Scholar
- Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53–75). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Reasoning, imagining, and creating. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 121–129.Google Scholar
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). How jazz musicians improvise. Music Perception, 19, 415–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levitt, T. (1983, May). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 5, 5–15.Google Scholar
- Marguc, J., Forster, J., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). Stepping back to see the big picture: when obstacles elicit global processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 883–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marguc, J., Van Kleef, G. A., & Förster, J. (2015). Welcome interferences: dealing with obstacles promotes creative thought in goal pursuit. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayer, M. A. (2006, February 12). Creativity loves constraints. Bloomberg Business.Google Scholar
- McPhee, J. (2013, April 29). Draft No. 4: Replacing the words in boxes. The New Yorker.Google Scholar
- Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mohney, G. (Interviewer), & Olson, J. (Interviewee). (2014, September 27). FDA approves study of scorpion-derived ‘tumor paint’ for brain cancer patients. Retrieved from ABC News Web site: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/fda-approves-study-scorpion-derived-tumor-paint-brain/story?id=25807433
- Roark, A. C. (2009, June 17). Day care for all ages. The New York Times.Google Scholar
- Seelig, T. (2012). inGenius: A crash course on creativity. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Sims, P. (2011). Little bets: How breakthrough ideas emerge from small discoveries. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Sternberg, R. J. (2009). The nature of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), The essential Sternberg: Essays on intelligence, psychology, and education (pp. 103–118). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Stokes, P. D. (2009). Using constraints to create novelty: A case study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stokes, P. D. (2014). Thinking inside the tool box: Creativity, constraints, and the colossal portraits of Chuck Close. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stokes, P. D. (2014). Using a creativity model to solve the place-value problem in kindergarten. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 24, 101–122.Google Scholar
- Stravinsky, I. (1956). The poetics of music in the form of six lessons. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Sense Publishers 2016