Advertisement

Assessing the Quality and Equity of Student Performance in Five Southeast Asian Countries

  • I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan

Abstract

It can be argued that education is a major existing global force that has the ability to prevent future destruction of life on planet Earth. While both national economic development and life expectancy are components of the Human Development Index, education is a key component of the index.

Keywords

Student Performance Human Development Index Hierarchical Linear Modelling Southeast Asian Country Gross National Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benevot, A., & Tanner, E. (2007). The growth of national learning assessments in the world 1995–2006. Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  2. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models; Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Cheung, K. C., Keeves, J. P., Sellin, N., & Tsoi, S. C. (1990). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research: Studies of problems and their solutions. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(3), 217–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartlant, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfall, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
  6. Hanna, G. (2000). Declining gender differences from FIMS to TIMSS. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik [International Reviews on Mathematical Education], 00(1), 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Husén, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries (Vols. 1–2). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
  8. Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (1996). Race, cultural capital and schooling: An analysis of trends in the United States. Sociology of Education, 69, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kamens, D. H., & McNeely, C. L. (2009). Globalization and the growth of international educational testing and national assessment. Comparative Education Review, 54(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  10. Keeves, J. P., Hungi, N., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2013). Effects of socioeconomic status, class size, and ability grouping in science achievement: A sociological approach. In S. Alagumalai, S. Burley, & J. P. Keeves (Eds.), Excellence in scholarship (pp. 19–42). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background – Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. II). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do – Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. I, Rev. ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Penner, A. M., & Paret, M. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37(1), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Postlethwaite, T. N. (2004). Monitoring educational achievement. Paris: IIEP.Google Scholar
  15. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6. Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  17. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2008). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling (Version: 6.06) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2014, October). Human development report, 2012 Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. Retrieved from www.undp.org/
  19. United Nations. (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision, United Nations, Department of Economic and social affair, population division. Retrieved October 3, 2013, from http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/unpp/panel_population.htmGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilkins, J., & Ma, X. (2002). Predicting student growth in mathematical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilkinson, C. R. (2015). A philosophy for the powerful learning of mathematics (Unpublished PhD thesis). School of Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
  22. Willms, J. D. (1996). Indicators of mathematics achievement in Canadian elementary schools. In HRDC (Ed.), Growing up in Canada: National longitudinal study of children and youth. Human resources development Canada and statistics Canada (pp. 69–82). Ottawa, Ontario: Human Resources Development Canada and Statistics Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of AdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations