Factors Associated with Malaysian Mathematics Performance in PISA 2012

  • Lei Mee Thien
  • I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan

Abstract

The impact of globalisation along with the critical demands for economic and social development have given rise to competition in keeping up with both international and regional growth. This situation has accelerated the momentum to strengthen and improve the education system of many countries especially in the Asia Pacific Region.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Areepattamannil, S., & Kaur, B. (2013). Factors predicting achievement of immigrant and non-immigrant students: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 11, 1183–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1993). Creating gender equity: Cross-national gender stratification and mathematics performance. Social Educucation, 66(2), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bembenutty, H. (2011). The last word: An interview with Harris Cooper—Research, policies, tips, and current perspectives on homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 342–351.Google Scholar
  5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioural research: Applications and data analysis methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teacher College Record, 64(8), 723–733.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, H., Lindsay, J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creemers, B. P. M. (1991). Review of effective teaching: Current research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creemers, B. P. M., & Scheerens, J. (1989). Developments in school effectiveness research. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7), 685–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of performance-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontaine, R., Richardson, S., & Foong, Y. P. (2002). The tropical fish revisited: A Malaysian perspective. Cross Cultural Management, 9, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glewwe, P. W., Hanushek, E. A., Humpage, S. D., & Ravina, R. (2011). School resources and educational outcomes in developing countries: A review of the literature from 1990 to 2011. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsu, J. C. (2007). Comparing the relationships between mathematics achievement and student characteristics in Canada and Hong Kong through HLM (Unpublished master thesis). University of Victoria, VIC, British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  17. Husén, T. (Ed.). (1967). International study of achievement in mathematics (Vol. 2). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  18. Keeves, J. P., & Kotte, D. (1998). Sex differences and educational outcome. In T. N. Postlethwaite, B. R. Clark, G. Neave, & T. Husén (Eds.), Education: The complete encyclopaedia. UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  19. Keeves, J. P., & Saha, L. J. (1998). Measurement of social background. In T. N. Postlethwaite, B. R. Clark, G. Neave, & T. Husen (Eds.), Education: the complete encyclopaedia. UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  20. Kitsantas, A., Cheema, J., & Ware, H. W. (2011). Mathematics performance: The role of homework and self-efficacy belief. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 310–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J.D. (1998). Introducing multilevel modelling. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kutnick, P., Ota, C., & Berdondini, L. (2008). Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity. Learning and Instruction, 18, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lam, T. Y. P., & Lau, K. C. (2014). Examining factors affecting science performance of Hong Kong in PISA 2006 using hierarchical linear modelling. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2463–2480. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.879223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma, X. (2005). A longitudinal assessment of early acceleration of students in mathematics on growth in mathematics performance. Development Review, 25, 104–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McConney, A., & Perry, L. B. (2010). Science and mathematics achievement in Australia: The role of school socioeconomic composition in educational equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Science Mathematics Education, 8(3), 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Milford, T. (2010). An investigation of International Science Performance using the OECD’s PISA 2006 Dataset (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Ministry of Education, MOE. (2013). Malaysian education blueprint 2013–2025: Preschool to postsecondary education. Putrajaya: MOE.Google Scholar
  29. Muthén, J. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Long Angeles, CA: Muthén and MuthénGoogle Scholar
  30. Nordin, A. R., Thien, L. M., & Darmawan, I-G. N. (2014). Relationship of student- and classroomlevel variables with TIMSS 2011 mathematics performance in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. In S. L. Ong, E. J. Gonzalez., & S. S. Kanageswari (Eds.), TIMSS 2011: What can we learn together? (pp. 38–64). Penang: SEAMEO RECSAM.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world-First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (Executive summary). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self- beliefs (Vol. 3). Paris: OECD publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264201170-enGoogle Scholar
  35. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2008). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling (Version: 6.06) [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, S. P. (2008). Motivation correlates of academic performance: Exploring how motivation influences academic performance in the PISA 2003 data (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  38. Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling, research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  39. Scheerens, J. (2002). School self-evaluation: Origins, definition, approaches, methods and implementation. In D. Nevo (Ed.), School-based evaluation: An international perspective (pp. 35–73). Oxford: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharp, C., Keys, W., & Benefield, P. (2001). Homework: A review of recent research. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  41. Shin, J., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (2009). Student and school factors affecting mathematics performance: International comparison between Korea, Japan and the USA. School Psychology International, 30(5), 520–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2004). Self-concept and self-efficacy: A test of the internal/external frame of reference model and predictions of subsequent motivation and performance. Psychological Reports, 95, 1187–1202.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, I. D. (2003). Home and coaching. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), The international handbook of educational research in the Asian-Pacific region (pp. 755–766). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stevens, T., Olivarez, A., Jr., & Hamman, D. (2006). The role of cognition, motivation, and emotion in explaining the mathematics performance gap between Hispanic and White students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stigler, J. W., & Perry, M. (1988). Cross cultural studies of mathematics teaching and learning: Recent findings and new directions. In D. A. Gouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspective on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 194–223). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  46. Stringfield, S. C., & Slavin, R. E. (1992). A hierarchical longitudinal model for elementary school effects. In B. P. M. Creemers & G. J. Reezigt (Eds.), Evaluation of educational effectiveness (pp. 35–39). Groningen: ICO.Google Scholar
  47. Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics performance: An update. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thien, L. M., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Ong, M. Y. (2015). Affective characteristics and mathematics performance in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand: What can PISA 2012 data tell us? Large-scale Assessments in Education, 3(1), 1–16. doi:10.1186/s40536-015-0013-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorndike, E. L. (1906). The principles of teaching: Based on psychology. New York, NY: A.G. Seiler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Townsend, T., & Cheng, Y. C. (2000). Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenge for the future. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  51. Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance performance? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s school. Educational Leadership, 41, 19–30.Google Scholar
  54. Willms, J. D., & Smith, T. M. (2005). A manual for conducting analyses with data from TIMSS and PISA. Montreal, Canada: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization Institute for Statistics (UIS).Google Scholar
  55. Wu, M. (2005). The role of plausible values in large-scale surveys. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. S. (2012). Homework and mathematics performance in Hong Kong: Evidence from the TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 907–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Students’ perceived responsibility and completion of homework: The role of self-regulatory beliefs and processes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Mee Thien
    • 1
  • I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan
    • 2
  1. 1.Research and Development DivisionSEAMEO Regional Centre for Science and Mathematics Education (RECSAM)Asia
  2. 2.School of EducationThe University of AdelaideSouth Australia

Personalised recommendations