Educating “Good” Citizens for a Globalized World

Two Different but Linked Countries
  • Murray Print
  • Chuanbao Tan
Part of the Civic and Political Education book series (CAPE)

Abstract

There are many ways to understand the concept of “good citizen”. This book focuses on what it means to be a “good citizen” in the twenty-first century by exploring this concept in two different, but closely linked, countries. China is a superpower in Asia, and internationally an emerging leading power, whose citizens are in the midst of major social and economic transformation. Australia, with British / European roots, is transforming itself into an Asian entity in multiple ways including through trade, economic and educational relations with China, its main trading partner.

Keywords

Citizenship Education Civic Virtue Good Citizen Global Citizenship Australian Curriculum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012a). The shape of the Australian curriculum, version 3. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/The_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_V3.pdf
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012b). The shape of the Australian curriculum: Civics and citizenship. Sydney, Australia: ACARA.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Government. (2014a). Review of the Australian curriculum: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://docs.education.gov.au/node/36269Google Scholar
  4. Australian Government. (2014b). Review of the Australian curriculum: Supplementary material. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://docs.education.gov.au/documents/review-australian-curriculum-supplementary-material
  5. Geissel, B. (2008). Democratic resources or democratic threat? Profiles of critical and uncritical citizens in comparative perspective. Comparative Sociology, 7(1), 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoskins, B., Barber, C., van Nijlen, D., & Villalba, E. (2011). Comparing civic competence among European youth: Composite and domain-specific indicators using IEA civic education study data. Comparative Education Review, 55(1), 82–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McLaughlin, T. H. (1992). Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 21(3), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ministerial Council for Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Melbourne, Australia: MCEETYA.Google Scholar
  9. Print, M. (2008). Education for democratic citizenship in Australia. In J. Arthur, I. Davies, & C. Hahn (Eds.), The Sage handbook of education for citizenship and democracy (pp. 95–108). London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Print, M. (2013). Competences for democratic citizenship in Europe. In M. Print & D. Lange (Eds.), Civic education and competences for engaging citizens in democracies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Veugelers, W. (2007). Creating critical democratic citizenship education: Empowering humanity and democracy in Dutch education. Compare, 37(1), 105–109.Google Scholar
  13. Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murray Print
  • Chuanbao Tan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations