Semiotics as a Tool for Learning Mathematics pp 89-109 | Cite as

# Visualising Cubic Reasoning with Semiotic Resources and Modeling Cycles

Chapter

## Abstract

Diagrams and physical manipulatives are often recommended as useful semiotic resources for visualising area and volume problems in which nonlinear reasoning is appropriate. However, the mere presence of diagrams and physical manipulatives does not guarantee students will recognise the appropriateness of nonlinear reasoning.

## Keywords

Small Fish Modelling Cycle Large Fish Real World Context Fishing Trip
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*70*(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects – State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*22*(1), 37–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - De Bock, D., van Dooren, W., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Improper use of linear reasoning: An in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students’ errors.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*50*, 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - De Bock, D., Verschaffel, L., Janssens, D., van Dooren, W., & Claes K. (2003). Do realistic contexts and graphical representations always have a beneficial impact on students’ performance? Negative evidence from a study on modeling non-linear geometry problems.
*Learning and Instruction*,*13*, 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Diezmann, C. (2005). Primary students’ knowledge of the properties of spatially oriented diagrams. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 281–288). Melbourne, Australia: PME.Google Scholar - Duval, R. (2006).A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*61*, 103–131.Google Scholar - Esteley, C., Villarreal, M., & Alagia, H. (2004). Extending linear models to non-linear contexts: An in depth study about two university students’ mathematical productions. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 343–350). Bergen, Norway: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Google Scholar - Gibson, D, (1998). Students’ use of diagrams to develop proofs in an introductory analysis course. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.),
*Research in collegiate mathematics education*(Vol. 7, pp. 284–307). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kaput, J. J. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.),
*Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra*(pp. 167–194). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Koedinger, K. (1994). Emergent properties and structural constraints: Advantages of diagrammatic representations for reasoning and learning. In B. Chandrasekaran & H. Simon (Eds.),
*Reasoning with diagrammatic representations*(pp. 151–156). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar - Lamon, S. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. K. J. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 629–667). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar - Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (Eds.). (2003).
*Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching*. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.),
*Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education*(pp. 591–646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Liljedahl, P. (2005). Mathematical discovery and
*affect*: The*effect*of AHA! Experiences on undergraduate mathematics students.*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology*,*36*(2–3), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Modestou, M., Elia, I., & Gagatsis, A. (2008). Behind the scenes of pseudo proportionality.
*International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology*,*39*(3), 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, M. Niss, & H.-W. Henn (Eds.),
*Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study*(New ICMI Studies Series) (Vol. 10, pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nunokawa, K. (2006). Using drawings and generating information in mathematical problem solving.
*Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education*,*2*(3), 33–35.Google Scholar - Pantziara, M., Gagatsis, A., & Elia, I. (2009). Using diagram as tools for the solution of non-routine mathematical problems.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*72*, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Peirce, C. S. (1931/1958). In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks (Eds.),
*Collected papers*(Vols. I–VIII). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar - Polya, G. (1957).
*How to solve it*. Princeton, NJ: University Press.Google Scholar - Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics*,*70*(2), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schoenfeld, A. (1994).
*Mathematical thinking and problem solving*. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar - Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In A. D. Grouws (Ed.),
*Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 465–494). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar - Stillman, G., Galbraith, P., Brown, J., & Edwards, I. (2007). A framework for success in implementing mathematical modelling in the secondary classroom. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.),
*Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Research Group of Australiasia, Hobart*(pp. 688–707). Adelaide, Australia: MERGA.Google Scholar - Thomas, M. O. J. (2008). Developing versatility in mathematical thinking.
*Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*,*7*(2), 67–87.Google Scholar - Thompson, D. W. (1992).
*On growth and form: The complete revised edition*. New York, NY: Dover Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Treffers, A. (1987).
*A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction: The Wiskobas project*. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar - van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2005). Not everything is proportional: Effects of age and problem type on propensities for over generalization.
*Cognition and Instruction*,*23*, 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - van Leeuwen, T. (2005).
*Introducing social semiotics*. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar - Yoon, C., Radonich P., & Sullivan, N. (in press).
*Volume and space: The snapper problem and variations*. New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2016