PCK at Stake in Teacher – Student Interaction in Relation to Students’ Difficulties
PCK has been a very successful concept in science education for the last 30 years. Many research studies have used this construct to study teachers’ development, teacher initial training and teachers’ practice. Although PCK has been very fruitful in providing a framework to identify what could be important knowledge for teaching, very little, if anything at all, is known about the link between PCK and student learning.
KeywordsScience Teaching Pedagogical Content Knowledge Video Data Table Generator Student Interaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., … Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.Google Scholar
- Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 147–161). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Grossman. P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Kind, V. (2015). On the beauty of knowing then not knowing. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 178–195), London, England: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In N. G. L. Julie Gess-Newsome (Ed.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Boston, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Sensevy, G. (2011). Overcoming fragmentation: Towards a joint action theory in didactics. In B. Hudson & M. Meyer (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 60–76). Opladen, Germany and Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
- Tiberghien, A., & Sensevy, G. (2012). Video studies: Time and duration in the teaching-learning processes. In J. Dillon & D. Jorde (Eds.), Handbook “The world of science education” (Vol. 4, pp. 141–179). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- van Driel, J. H., Berry, A., & Meirink, J. A. (2014). Research on science teacher knowledge. In N. Lederman (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 848–870). London, England: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Whitebread, D., & Grau Cardenas, V. (2012). Self-regulated learning and conceptual development in young children: the development of biological understanding. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 101–132). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar