Skip to main content

Peer Observation in the Online Learning Environment

The Case of Aviation Higher Education

  • Chapter
Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching

Part of the book series: Professional Learning ((PROFL))

  • 1579 Accesses

Abstract

Distance education has emerged as an issue of high importance in the field of aviation higher education (Prather, 2006; Scarpelline & Bowen, 2001). Fullingim (2011) suggests that training needs in the aviation industry are expected to grow by more than 40 percent over the next two decades. Online learning offers great potential in meeting this increased demand (Raisinghani et al., 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aceves, R. I., & Aceves, P. A. (2008). Preparing aviators for the 21st century: A 3-year case study of service learning in the aviation classroom. Collegiate Aviation Review, 26(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2001). Supported reflective practice: A program of peer observation and feedback for academic teaching development. International Journal of Academic Development, 6(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. England, UK: McGraw Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, B., Scarpelline, N., & Fink, M. (2001). Accreditation of collegiate aviation’s distance education programs: Now and into the future. The Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 11(2), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1989). Facilitating adult learning. In S. Merriam & P. Cunningham (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, A., Ross, B., Phelan, L., Lindsay, K., Drew, S., Stoney, S., & Cottman, C. (2014). Course evaluation matters: Improving students’ learning experiences with a peer-assisted teaching programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, J. M., D’Artrey, M., & Rowe, D.-A. (2011). Peer observation of teaching: A decoupled process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. K., & Berge, Z. L. (2002). Overcoming barriers to distance training and education. USDLA Journal, 16(1), 16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, C.-K., Chang, M., Wang, C.-Y., Chung, W.-C., & Chen, G.-D. (2008). Application of e-learning to pilot training at TransAsia airways in Taiwan. International Journal on E-learning, 7(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. (2000). FOCUS: Assuring quality in distance learning. The Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) Chronical, 3(3), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullingim, J. F. (2011). The marketability of higher education aviation graduates as perceived by regional Airline Pilots. Collegiate Aviation Review, 29(1), 28–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Designing blended learning to create a community of inquiry blended learning in higher education: Framework principles and guidelines (pp. 31–48). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobert, F., Lane, P. C. R., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C.-H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 36–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith University. (n.d.). The Griffith PRO-Teaching project. Retrieved 20 June, 2014, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/learning-teaching/quality/peer-review-of-teaching/pro-teaching

  • Hager, P., Holland, S., & Beckett, D. (2002). Enhancing the learning and employability of graduates: The role of generic skills. Paper presented at the Business/Higher Education Round Table. Retrieved from http://www.bhert.com/publications/position-papers/B-HERTPositionPaper09.pdf

  • Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Constructionism. New York, NY: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J., Smith, B. J., & Yates, R. (2011). Podcasting in aviation education: Student’s perceptions. Journal of Aviation Management and Education, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperly, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., Merritt, A. C., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1999). The evolution of crew resource managment training in commercial aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentea, M., Shea, M. J., & Pennington, L. (2003). A perspective on fulfilling the expectation of distance education. Paper presented at the 4th conference on Information technology curriculum, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, M. R. (1998). Cooperative and collaborative learning in university aviation education. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Tempe, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, S. (2010). E-learning in aviation. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kille, T., Bates, P., & Murray, P. S. (in press). Educating aviators: Challenges for distance learning in aviation tertiary education. In A. Scheg (Ed.), Critical examinations of distance education transformation across disciplines. USA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W., & Lai, Y.-C. (2013). Harnessing collaborative annotations on online formative assessments. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas, L., & Nicholls, G. (2005). Enhancing teaching quality through peer review of teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 11(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavin, T., & Dall’Alba, G. (2011). Understanding complex assessment: A lesson from aviation. Paper presented at the ICERI2011 Conference, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Standl, B. (2013). Person-centered technology enhanced learning: Dimensions of added value. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, D. C. (1988). Human error in aviation operations. In E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (pp. 263–303). London, England: Academic Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D., & Macfarlane, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, J. R., & Clynick, G. (1995). The commercial pilot of the future. Paper presented at the Second Pacific International Conference on Aeropsace and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettitt, M. A., & Dunlap, J. H. (1994). Training pilots or educating captains? A framework for collegiate ab initio programs. The Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 5(1), 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prather, D. C. (2006). Distance learning in collegiate aviation: Meeting the needs of airport professionals. Collegiate Aviation Review, 24(1), 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, P. (2010). Making learning happen. London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisinghani, M., Chowdhury, M., Colquitt, C., Reyes, P. M., Bonakdar, N., Ray, J., & Robles, J. (2005). Distance education in the business aviation industry: Issues and opportunities. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 3(1), 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, B., Wood, L., Clark-Murphy, M., Daly, A., Dixon, P., Kavanagh, M., & Thomas, T. (2009). Review of graduate skils: Critical thinking, teamwork, ethical practice & sustainability. Australian Learning & Teaching Council Project: Embedding the development and grading of generic skills across the buiness curriculum Retrieved from http://www.graduateskills.edu.au/literature-review/

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpelline, N. M., & Bowen, B. D. (2001). Evaluation and action: Sustaining excellence in collegiate aviation distance education. Collegiate Aviation Review, 19(1), 140–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheck, M. (2012). Training and management of pilots across generations. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(3), 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2012). Ten suggestions for improving academic research in education and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 213–219. doi:10.1080/17439884.2012.680213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, K. O. (2007). Distance learner expectations for quality, technology-enabled, support services (Order No. 3348994, Walden University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/304766658?accountid=33317

  • Thomas, M. (2003). Internet-based education and training: Using new technologies to facilitate instruction and enhance learning. In A. Henley (Ed.), Aviation education and training: Adult learning principles and teaching strategies (pp. 342–362). UK, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walser, T. (2009). An action research study of student self-assessment in higher educaion. Innovative Higher Education, 34(5), 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kille, T., Bates, P., Murray, P.S. (2015). Peer Observation in the Online Learning Environment. In: Klopper, C., Drew, S. (eds) Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching. Professional Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-289-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics