Playing in Entangled Spaces

Exploring Ethical Know-How through Embodied Inquiry
  • Tristan Khaner
  • Warren Linds


Every human act takes place in language. Every act in language brings forth a world created with others in the act of coexistence which gives rise to what is human. Thus every human act has an ethical meaning because it is an act of constitution of the human world. This linkage of human to human is, in the final analysis, the groundwork of all ethics as a reflection on the legitimacy of the presence of others.


Ethical Dilemma Image Theatre Reflective Practice Safe Space Workplace Bully 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Appelbaum, D. (1995). The stop. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, R., Burke, B., James, C., Martin, D., & Thomas, B. (1991). Educating for a change. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  3. Boal, A. (1979). Theatre of the oppressed (C. A. McBride & M. O. McBride, Trans.). London, UK: Pluto Press. (Original work published 1974)Google Scholar
  4. Boal, A. (1992). Games for actors and non-actors (A. Jackson, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1992)Google Scholar
  5. Boal, A. (1995). The rainbow of desire: The Boal method of theatre and therapy (A. Jackson, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1995)Google Scholar
  6. Boud, D. (2010). Relocating reflection in the context of practice. In H. Bradbury, N. Frost, & M. Zukas (Eds.), Beyond reflective practice: New approaches to professional lifelong learning (pp. 25–36). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brandon, J. R. (1978, December). Training at the Waseda little theatre. The Drama Review, 22(4), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Depraz, N., Varela, F. J., & Vermersch, P. (2003). On becoming aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamond, D. (1991). Power plays: A joker’s manual. Vancouver, BC: Headlines Theatre.Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, D. (2007). Theatre for living: The art and science of community-based dialogue. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Edmiston, B. (2000). Drama as ethical education. Research in Drama Education, 5(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen, M. B. N. (2009). System-environment hybrids. In B. Clarke & M. B. N. Hansen (Eds.), Emergence and embodiment: New essays on second-order systems theory (pp. 113–142). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway, D. (1992). The Promises of monsters: A Regenerative politics for inappropriated others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295–337). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Haskell, J., Linds, W., & Ippolito, J. (2002). Opening spaces of possibility: The enactive as a qualitative research approach. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), 140–161. Art. 14. Retrieved from
  18. Heron, J. (1999). The complete facilitator’s handbook. London, UK: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  19. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 179–188). London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Iedema, R. (2007). On the multi-modality, materiality and contingency of organizational discourse. Organization Studies, 28(6), 931–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, A. (1995). Introduction. In A. Boal (Ed.), The rainbow of desire (pp. xviii–xxvi). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Jaworski, J. (1996). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  24. Keevers, L., & Treleaven, L. (2011). Organizing practices of reflection: A practice-based study. Management Learning, 42(5), 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennedy, N. S., & Kennedy, D. (2010). Between chaos and entropy: Community of inquiry from a systems perspective. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  26. Kotzé, D. (2002). Doing participatory ethics. In D. Kotzé, J. Myburg, J. Roux, & Associates (Eds.), Ethical ways of being (pp. 2–34). Pretoria: Ethics Alive.Google Scholar
  27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Law, J. (2000). On the subject of the object: Narrative, technology and interpellation. Configurations, 8(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Linds, W. (2001). A journey in metaxis: Been, being, becoming, imag(in)ing drama facilitation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Retrieved from Scholar
  30. Linds, W. (2005–2014). Class handout for AHSC 660 (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  31. Loy, D. (1993). Indra’s post-modern net. Philosophy East and West, 43(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mason, J. (2002). The discipline of noticing: Researching your own practice. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (2nd ed.) (R. Paolucci, Trans.). Boston, MA: Shambhala. (Original work published in 1987)Google Scholar
  34. Nachmanovitch, S. (1990). Free play: The power of improvisation in life and the arts. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
  35. Park, S. (2007). Facilitating inquiry-based learning: From resilience to mindfulness. Proceedings of the 2007 Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference, February 18–20, Vancouver, British Columbia, 191–208.Google Scholar
  36. Patterson, K., Grenny, J., McMillan, R., & Switzler, A. (2012). Crucial conversations: Tools for talking when stakes are high (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Pippen, J., & Eden, D. (1997). Resonating bodies. Reflections on 50 years of theory and practice in voice and movement training for actors and the framing of a manifesto for today. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology Centre for Innovation in the Arts.Google Scholar
  38. Proulx, J. (2010). Is “Facilitator” the right word? And on what grounds? Some reflections and theorizations. Complicity: International Journal of Complexity Education, 7(2), 52–65.Google Scholar
  39. Quinlan, E. (2007). Contemporary challenges to caring labour and time-honoured transformative tools: Workplace bullying and the theatre of the oppressed. Just Labour. A Canadian Journal of Work and Society, 17/18, 83–105.Google Scholar
  40. Reivich, K., & Shatté, A. (2002). The resilience factor: 7 keys to finding your inner strength and overcoming life’s hurdles. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rilke, R. M. (1993). Letters to a young poet. (M. D. H. Norton, Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published in 1934)Google Scholar
  42. Rohd, M. (1998). Theatre for community, conflict and dialogue: The hope is vital training manual. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  43. Salvio, P. (1997). On keying pedagogy as an interpretive event. In T. R. Carson & D. Sumara (Eds.), Action research as a living practice (pp. 247–264). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  44. Sameshima, P., Irwin, R. L., Beer, R., Grauer, K., Xiong, G., Bickel, B., & Ricketts, K. (2009). Rendering embodied heteroglossic spaces. Journal of Arts, 2(1), 129–145.Google Scholar
  45. Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  46. Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Presence: Human purpose and the field of the future. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  47. Stacey, R. (2003). Learning as an activity of interdependent people. The Learning Organization, 10, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stacey, R. D., & Griffin, D. (2005). A complexity perspective on researching organizations: Taking experience seriously. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, M., de Guerre, D., Gavin, J., & Kass, R. (2002). Graduate leadership education for dynamic human systems. Management Learning, 33, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom and cognition. (L. Gius & R. B. Figli, Trans.). California, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Velasco, X. (2013). Participatory Action Research (PAR) for sustainable community development. Retrieved from Scholar
  53. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Weiss, C. (1999). Body images: Embodiment as intercorporality. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Wright, D. (2005). Embodying, emotioning, expressing learning. Reflective Practice, 6, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yorks, L., & Kasl, E. (2002). Toward a theory and practice for whole-person learning: Reconceptualizing experience and the role of affect. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zarillii, P. (Ed.). (1995). Acting (re)considered: Theories and practices. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tristan Khaner
    • 1
  • Warren Linds
    • 2
  1. 1.Student, Masters Program in Human Systems InterventionConcordia UniversityCanada
  2. 2.Department of Applied Human SciencesConcordia UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations