Advertisement

Trump, International Trade and Populism

  • Lukasz Gruszczynski
  • Jessica LawrenceEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law book series (NYIL, volume 49)

Abstract

This chapter argues that Donald Trump’s particular brand of populism should be seen not as a rejection of neoliberalism, but rather as a variant of it. Both Trump’s ‘populist neoliberalism’ and orthodox ‘globalist neoliberalism’ share the core markers of neoliberal political rationality: the conceptual centrality of the market as the site of veridiction in political and social life; a vision of the individual—at least in the aggregate—as the rational, self-interest maximizing homo economicus; and a reliance on government to create the optimal conditions for market functioning. While Trump indeed differs from globalists when it comes to assessing the value of current international economic governance structures, he has by no means rejected the broader tenets of neoliberal political reason. Rather, his policies aim to promote a free market-oriented neoliberalism domestically, while advocating competitive policies in the international market that clash with the cooperative globalist neoliberalism of the centrist ‘elite’. This alternative neoliberal vision of the global economy differs only in that it is oriented toward competition rather than cooperation on the international front. The chapter thus argues that Trump’s economic policies are not a sign of the victory of ‘the people’ over neoliberalism, but rather of Trump’s opposition to the internationalism of the globalist neoliberal political platform.

Keywords

Globalism Globalization International trade Neoliberalism Neoliberal populism Populism Protectionism Trump 

References

  1. Albertazzi D, McDonnell D (2008) Introduction: The Sceptre and the Spectre. In: Albertazzi D, McDonnell D (eds) Twenty-first Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown W (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Zone Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Canovan M (1999) Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 47:2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cozzolino A (2018) Trumpism as Nationalist Neoliberalism. A Critical Enquiry into Donald Trump’s Political Economy. Interdisciplinary Political Studies 4(1): 47–73Google Scholar
  5. Dean M (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, 2nd edn. Sage Publication Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault M (2003) “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the College de France, 1975–1976. Picador, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Foucault M (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Foucault M (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser M (2017) From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump—and Beyond. American Affairs 1(4):46–64Google Scholar
  10. Guardino M (2018) Neoliberal Populism as Hegemony: A Historical-Ideological Analysis of US Economic Policy Discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 15(5):444–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gusterson H (2017) From Brexit to Trump: Anthropology and the Rise of Nationalist Populism. American Ethnologist 44(2): 209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey D (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Higgott R (2018) From Policy to Populism: Donald Trump’s Trade Policy in Global Context, Royal Institute Elcano Research Paper ARI 47/2018, http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/ae4e55bf-7b15-4798-8c43-9ad4e152b533/ARI47-2018-Higgot-From-policy-to-populism-Donald-Trumps-trade-policy-global-context.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ae4e55bf-7b15-4798-8c43-9ad4e152b533. Accessed 15 October 2018
  14. Inglehart RF, Norris P (2016) Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP16-026. https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1401. Accessed 23 October 2018
  15. Judis JB (2016) The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. Columbia Global Reports, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Judis JB, Teixeira R (2002) The Emerging Democratic Majority. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Konings M (2012) Imagined Double Movements: Progressive Thought and the Specter of Neoliberal Populism. Globalizations 9(4):609–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koskenniemi M (2009) The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later. European Journal of International Law 20(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laclau E (2005) On Populist Reason. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence JC (2018) Governmentality in EU External Trade and Environment Policy: Between Rights and Market, Routledge, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Mudde C (2004) The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4):541–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petri PA, Plummer MG (2016) The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper 16-2. https://piie.com/system/files/documents/wp16-2_0.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2018
  23. Rose N, Miller P (1992) Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology 43(2):173–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shils E (1956) The Torment of Secrecy: The Background and Consequences of American Security Policies. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Solís M (2016) The Trans-Pacific Partnership: The Politics of Openness and Leadership in the Asia-Pacific. Brookings Asia Working Group Paper 6. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/fp_20161017_tpp_openness_leadership_final.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2018
  26. Springer S, Birch K, MacLeavy J (eds) (2016) The Handbook of Neoliberalism. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Taggart P (2000) Populism. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  28. Taggart P (2002) Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. In: Mény Y, Surel Y (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Palgrave, Basingstoke, 62–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ware A (2002) The United States: Populism as Political Strategy. In: Mény Y, Surel Y (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Palgrave, Basingstoke, 101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Westlind D (1996) The Politics of Popular Identity: Understanding Recent Populist Movements in Sweden and the United States. Lund University Press, LundGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson GK (2017) Brexit, Trump and the Special Relationship. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19(3):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yoo JY, Ahn D (2016) Security Exceptions in the WTO System: Bridge or Bottle-Neck for Trade and Security? Journal of International Economic Law 19(2):417–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kozminski UniversityWarsawPoland
  2. 2.HAS CSS Institute for Legal StudiesBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Central European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations