Advertisement

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Challenges for International Law and Security

  • Dieter FleckEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons on 7 July 2017 (with a vote of 122-1-1, in which no nuclear-armed State participated) may be understood on the background of existing failures to implement disarmament obligations under the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT); the lack of universality of the NPT; and increasing concerns on the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons that unfolded over the past years. While it may be still too early for a lasting assessment whether the new Treaty may ultimately contribute to reaching the goal of a world without nuclear weapons and whether it has the potential to gain global acceptance over time, a comprehensive evaluation of existing legal controversies, certain textual deficiencies of the new Treaty, and its foreseeable impact on international security is both necessary and timely. International lawyers have an important contribution to make in this regard.

Keywords

Humanitarian Impact Nuclear Ban Nuclear Disarmament Nuclear Tests Nuclear Weapons Disarmament Verification 

References

  1. Bauer S, O’Reilly C (2016) The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO): current and future role in the verification regime of the Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. In: Black-Branch JL, Fleck D (eds) Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law: Vol. II Verification and Compliance. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 131–150Google Scholar
  2. Boisson de Chazournes L, Sands P (eds) (1999) International Law, the International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Boothby W H (2009) Weapons and the Law of Armed Conflict. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Borrie J, Caughley T (eds) (2013) Viewing Nuclear Weapons through a Humanitarian Lens. UNIDIR. http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/viewing-nuclear-weapons-through-a-humanitarian-lens-en-601.pdf
  5. Burroughs J (2013) International Humanitarian Law. In: Fihn B (ed) Unspeakable suffering - the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons. Reaching Critical Will, pp 69–75. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/resources/publications-and-research/publications/7422-unspeakable-suffering-the-humanitarian-impact-of-nuclear-weapons
  6. Burroughs J (2017) Key Issues in Negotiations for a Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Treaty. Arms Control Today. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2017-06/features/key-issues-negotiations-nuclear-weapons-prohibition-treaty
  7. Carlson J (2017a) Policy Brief No 42 - The Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Treaty: Aim, Scope and Limitations. http://a-pln.org/briefings/briefings_view/Policy_Brief_No_42_-_The_Nuclear_Weapons_Prohibition_Treaty:_Aim,_Scope_and_Limitations?ckattempt=1
  8. Carlson J (2017b) Nuclear Weapon Prohibition Treaty: A Safeguards Debacle. 158 Trust and Verify, 1–6.http://www.vertic.org/media/assets/TV/TV158.pdf
  9. Department of Defense (2015) Law of War Manual. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleck D (2016) Nuclear weapons in international law, Chapter 13. In: Liivoja R, McCormack T (eds) Routledge Handbook of the Law of Armed Conflict. Routledge, London/New York, pp 233–250Google Scholar
  11. Grimal F (2013) Threats of Force: International law and strategy. Routledge, London/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimal F (2016) ‘Jus ad Bellum: Nuclear Weapons and the Inherent Right of Self-Defence’. In: Black-Branch JL, Fleck D (eds) Nuclear Non-Proliferation in International Law: Vol. II Verification and Compliance. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 337–350Google Scholar
  13. Hayashi N (2014) Legality under jus ad bellum of the threat of use of nuclear weapons. In: Nystuen G, Casey-Maslen S, Golden Bersagel A (eds) Nuclear Weapons Under International Law. Cambridge University Press, 31–58Google Scholar
  14. Hiroshima Report (2017) Center for the Promotion of Disarmament and Non-Proliferation. The Japan Institute of International Affairs (ed) Evaluation of Achievement in Nuclear Disarmament, Non-Proliferation and Nuclear Security in 2016. Hiroshima PrefectureGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalshoven F (1985) Arms, Armament and International Law. Recueils des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye, Vol. 191-II, 183Google Scholar
  16. Kalshoven F, Zegveld L (2011) Constraints on the Waging of War, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, 118Google Scholar
  17. Kilkenny C (2017) Nobel Peace Prize acknowledges anti-nuclear movement. http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2017/10/06/nobel-peace-prize-acknowledges-anti-nuclear-movement/
  18. Kile SN, Kristensen HM (2017) World nuclear forces. In: SIPRI Yearbook 2017. OUP, Chapter 11, pp 411–412Google Scholar
  19. Mackby J (2016) Still seeking, still fighting. 23 Nos 3-4 Nonproliferation Review, 261–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mian Z (2017) After the nuclear weapons ban treaty: A new disarmament politics. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://thebulletin.org/after-nuclear-weapons-ban-treaty-new-disarmament-politics10932
  21. Mukhatzhanova G (2017) The Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Treaty: Negotiations and Beyond. Arms Control Today. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2017-09/features/nuclear-weapons-prohibition-treaty-negotiations-beyond
  22. Nanda VP, Krieger D (1998) Nuclear Weapons and the World Court. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Norwegian Nobel Committee (2017) Proclamation of the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize. https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/
  24. Perkovich G (2017) The Nuclear Ban Treaty: What Would Follow? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Paper 31 May 2017. http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/05/31/nuclear-ban-treaty-what-would-follow-pub-70136
  25. Quinlan M (2009) Thinking About Nuclear Weapons. Principles, Problems, Prospects. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. Report of the Open-ended Working Group taking forward multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations. UN Doc A/71/371 (1 September 2016). https://www.un.org/disarmament/ptnw/
  27. Rietiker D (2017a) Humanization of Arms Control. Paving the Way for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Rietiker D (2017b) New Hope for Nuclear Disarmament or “Much Ado About Nothing?”: Legal Assessment of the New “Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons” and the Joint Statement by the USA, UK, and France Following its Adoption. Harvard International Law Journal (8 December 2017). http://www.harvardilj.org/2017/12/new-hope-for-nuclear-disarmament-or-much-ado-about-nothing-legal-assessment-of-the-new-treaty-on-the-prohibition-of-nuclear-weapons-and-the-joint-statement-by-the/
  29. Roscini M (2007) Threats of Armed Force and Contemporary International Law. Netherlands International Law Review, 229–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rühle M (2017) Eine neue nukleare Ordnung in Asien? 2 September 2017, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10Google Scholar
  31. Sanger D E, Sang-Hun C, Rich M (2017) North Korea Rouses Neighbors to Reconsider Nuclear Weapons. New York Times, 28 October 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/28/world/asia/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-japan-south-korea.html
  32. Thakur R (2017) The Nuclear Ban Treaty: Recasting a Normative Framework for Disarmament. The Washington Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 4, 71–95. http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/u2dIgiQ7uJqX6KedE6EI/fullCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thürer D (2011) The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons: The ICJ Advisory Opinion Reconsidered. Inaugural speech, Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law (20 October 2011). http://www.geneva-academy.ch/docs/events/Adh-Geneva-inaugural-speech-2011-2012-Prof-Thuerer.pdf, at 8–17
  34. Trezza C (2017) The UN Nuclear Ban Treaty and the NPT: Challenges for Nuclear Disarmament. Istituto Affari Internazionali. http://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/un-nuclear-ban-treaty-and-npt-challenges-nuclear-disarmament
  35. U.S. Navy (2017) The Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP 1.14 M) Edition August 2017Google Scholar
  36. UK Ministry of Defence (2004) UK Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  37. von Baeckmann A, Dillon G, Perricors D (1995) Nuclear verification in South Africa. Verifying South Africa’s declared nuclear inventory, and the termination of its weapons programme, was a complex task. IAEA Bulletin 1/1995, 42–48. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/magazines/bulletin/bull37-1/37105394248.pdf
  38. Wang R (2017) China and the Nuclear Weapons Prohibition Treaty. Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy, 21 September 2017. http://carnegietsinghua.org/2017/09/21/china-and-nuclear-weapons-prohibition-treaty-pub-73488

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser press and the authors 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CologneGermany

Personalised recommendations