Advertisement

Helping Migrants While Protecting Against Migration: The Border Security Team in Crisis

  • J. P. Kalkman
  • M. T. I. B. Bollen
  • E. de Waard
Chapter
Part of the NL ARMS book series (NLARMS)

Abstract

In this chapter, we study the inter-organizational response to the European migration crisis by using a collective sensemaking perspective. Collective sensemaking refers to the process by which organizations construct a shared understanding of an ambiguous and confusing situation, which subsequently facilitates collaboration between them. On the basis of interviews, we distill different narratives on the migration crisis for the Dutch Border Security Team (BST) and its partner organizations (i.e. Frontex, Greek authorities, and humanitarian organizations). The BST, Frontex and the Greek authorities viewed the crisis primarily in terms of a security threat, which fostered easy collaboration between them in border protection tasks. BST members, however, also deplored the suffering of migrants and found some common ground with humanitarian actors, thus becoming involved in several humanitarian actions as well. As a result, BST members ended up helping migrants while at the same time protecting Europe against migration.

Keywords

border security collective sensemaking Frontex Chios migration crisis collaboration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are heavily indebted to the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee for their support throughout the data collection process. Specifically, we express our gratitude to DOPS KMar, the commander and personnel of the seventh BST-rotation at Chios, and BST members of previous rotations. Additionally, we thank the editors and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Balogun J, Bartunek JM, Do B (2015) Senior Managers’ Sensemaking and Responses to Strategic Change. Organization Science 26:960–979Google Scholar
  2. Balogun J, Johnson G (2004) Organizational Restructuring and Middle Manager Sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal 47:523–549Google Scholar
  3. Bergeron CD, Cooren F (2012) The Collective Framing of Crisis Management: A Ventriloqual Analysis of Emergency Operations Centres. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 20:120–137Google Scholar
  4. Bigo D (2002) Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives 27:63–92Google Scholar
  5. Bigo D (2014) The (In)Securitization Practices of the Three Universes of EU Border Control: Military/Navy—Border Guards/Police—Database Analysts. Security Dialogue 45:209–225Google Scholar
  6. Boin A, ‘t Hart P, Stern E, Sundelius B (2005) The Politics of Crisis Management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen M, Rietjens B (2008) Managing civil-military cooperation. Ashgate, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  8. Caroll JS (2015) Making Sense of Ambiguity through Dialogue and Collaborative Action. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 23:59–65Google Scholar
  9. Chreim S (2006) Managerial Frames and Institutional Discourses of Change: Employee Appropriation and Resistance, Organization Studies 27:1261–1287Google Scholar
  10. Colville I, Pye A, Carter M (2013) Organizing to Counter Terrorism: Sensemaking amidst dynamic complexity. Human Relations 66:1201–1223Google Scholar
  11. Cornelissen JP, Mantere S, Vaara E (2014) The Contraction of Meaning: The Combined Effect of Communication Emotions and Materiality on Sensemaking in the Stockwell Shooting. Journal of Management Studies 51:699–736Google Scholar
  12. Currie G, Brown AD (2003) A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Human Relations 56:563–586Google Scholar
  13. Dawson P, Buchanan D (2005) The way it really happened: Competing narratives in the political process of technological change. Human Relations 58: 845–865Google Scholar
  14. Donnellon A, Gray B, Bougon MG (1986) Communication Meaning and Organized Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31:43–55Google Scholar
  15. d’Haenens L, De Lange M (2001) Framing of asylum seekers in Dutch regional newspapers. Media, Culture & Society 23:847–860Google Scholar
  16. Dunford R, Jones D (2000) Narrative in strategic change. Human Relations 53:1207–1226Google Scholar
  17. Engwall M, Westling G (2004) Peripety in an R&D Drama: Capturing a Turnaround in Project Dynamics. Organization Studies 25:1557–1578Google Scholar
  18. European Parliament and Council (2016) Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 September 2016. Official Journal of the European Union L 251/1Google Scholar
  19. Figenschou TU, Thorbjørnsrud K (2015) Faces of an Invisible Population: Human Interest Framing of Irregular Immigration News in the United States, France, and Norway. American Behavioral Scientist 59:783–801Google Scholar
  20. Franke V (2006) The peacebuilding dilemma: Civil-military cooperation in stability operations. International Journal of Peace Studies 11:5–25Google Scholar
  21. Freedman J (2016) Engendering Security at the Borders of Europe: Women Migrants and the Mediterranean ‘Crisis’. Journal of Refugee Studies 29:568–582Google Scholar
  22. Frontex (2017a) Risk Analysis for 2017. Frontex, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  23. Frontex (2017b) Poseidon Sea. http://frontex.europa.eu/operations/archive-of-operations/Lq8P8c Accessed 8 February 2018
  24. Gerard A, Pickering S (2014) Gender Securitization and Transit: Refugee Women and the Journey to the EU. Journal of Refugee Studies 27:228–259Google Scholar
  25. Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation. Strategic Management Journal 12:433–448Google Scholar
  26. Harris SG (1994) Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: A Schema-Based Perspective. Organization Science 5:309–321Google Scholar
  27. Hope O (2010) The Politics of Middle Management Sensemaking and Sensegiving. Journal of Change Management 10:195–215Google Scholar
  28. HRW (2016) Q&A: Why the EU-Turkey Migration Deal is No Blueprint. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/11/14/qa-why-eu-turkey-migration-deal-no-blueprint Accessed 8 February 2018
  29. Humphreys M, Ucbasaran D, Locket A (2011) Sensemaking and sensegiving stories of jazz leadership. Human Relations 65:41–62Google Scholar
  30. Huysmans J (2000) The European Union and the Securitization of Migration. Journal of Common Market Studies 38:751–777Google Scholar
  31. IOM (2017) Missing Migrants: Tracking deaths along migratory routes. https://missingmigrants.iom.int/ Accessed 8 February 2018
  32. Kalkman JP (2016) Explaining the Role of the Armed Forces in the Dutch Safety Regions. In: Beeres R et al (eds) NL ARMS: Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2016: Organizing for Safety and Security in Military Organizations. T.M.C Asser Press, The Hague, pp 185–202Google Scholar
  33. Kalkman JP, De Waard EJ (2017) Inter-Organizational Disaster Management Projects: Finding the Middle Way between Trust and Control. International Journal of Project Management 35:889–899Google Scholar
  34. Kendra J, Wachtendorf T (2006) The waterborne evacuation of Lower Manhattan on September 11: A case of distributed sensemaking. Preliminary Paper #355, University of Delaware Disaster Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  35. Kingsley P, Rankin J (2016) EU-Turkey refugee deal – Q&A. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/08/eu-turkey-refugee-deal-qa Accessed 8 February 2018
  36. Lazaridis G, Skleparis D (2015) Securitization of migration and the far right: the case of Greek security professionals. International Migration 54:176–192Google Scholar
  37. Léonard S (2010) FRONTEX and the Securitization of Migrants through Practices. European Security 19:231–254Google Scholar
  38. Maitlis S, Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. The Academy of Management Annals 8:57–125Google Scholar
  39. Maitlis S, Sonenshein S (2010) Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies 47:551–580Google Scholar
  40. Mills JH, Weatherbee TG (2006) Hurricanes Hardly Happen: Sensemaking as a Framework for Understanding Organizational Disasters. Culture and Organization 12:265–279Google Scholar
  41. Nickels HC (2007) Framing Asylum Discourse in Luxembourg. Journal of Refugee Studies 20:37–59Google Scholar
  42. Pratt MG (2000) The Good the Bad and the Ambivalent: Managing Identification among Amway Distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly 45:456–493Google Scholar
  43. Ravasi D, Schultz M (2006) Responding to organizational identity threats: exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal 49:433–456Google Scholar
  44. Roggeband C, Vliegenthart R (2007) Divergent Framing: The Evolution of the Public Debate on Migration and Integration in the Dutch Parliament and Media 1995–2004. West European Politics 30:524-548Google Scholar
  45. Rosenthal U, ‘t Hart P, Kouzmin A (1991) The Bureau-Politics of Crisis Management. Public Administration 69:211–233Google Scholar
  46. Ruz C (2015) The battle over the words used to describe migrants. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34061097 Accessed 8 February 2018
  47. Salmon P, Stanton N, Jenkins D, Walker G (2011) Coordination during multi‐agency emergency response: issues and solutions. Disaster Prevention and Management 20:140–158Google Scholar
  48. Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2015) Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior 36:6–32Google Scholar
  49. Steimel SJ (2010) Refugees as People: The Portrayal of Refugees in American Human Interest Stories. Journal of Refugee Studies 23:219–237Google Scholar
  50. The Guardian (2015) We will hurt EU if migrant crisis is not fixed, says Italian PM Matteo Renzi. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/15/we-will-hurt-eu-if-migrant-crisis-is-not-fixed-says-italian-pm-matteo-renzi Accessed 8 February 2018
  51. UNHCR (2016) UNHCR viewpoint: ‘Refugee’ or ‘migrant’ – Which is right? http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2016/7/55df0e556/unhcr-viewpoint-refugee-migrant-right.html Accessed 8 February 2018
  52. Van Gorp B (2005) Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication 20:484–507Google Scholar
  53. Van Hulst M, Yanow D (2016) From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic Political Approach. American Review of Public Administration 46:92–112Google Scholar
  54. Weick KE (1988) Enacted Sensemaking in Crisis Situations. Journal of Management Studies 25:305–317Google Scholar
  55. Weick KE (1993) The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38:628–652Google Scholar
  56. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  57. Weick KE (2005) Managing the Unexpected: Complexity as Distributed Sensemaking. In: McDaniel RR, Driebe DJ (eds), Uncertainty and Surprise in Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 51–65Google Scholar
  58. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (2005) Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science 16:409–421Google Scholar
  59. Wolbers J, Boersma K (2013) The common operational picture as collective sensemaking. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 21:186–199Google Scholar
  60. Yin RK (2012) Applications of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser press and the authors 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Kalkman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. T. I. B. Bollen
    • 1
  • E. de Waard
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Military SciencesNetherlands Defence AcademyBredaThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Organization SciencesVU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.TNO DefenceSafety and SecuritySoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations