Advertisement

A State Without Territory?

  • Veronika Bílková
Chapter
Part of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law book series (NYIL, volume 47)

Abstract

The chapter considers whether a State can exist without territory. It argues that if the functional theory of territory is accepted, then the concept of a deterritorialized State may indeed be conceivable. The chapter however cautions against embracing this concept hastily, drawing attention to four caveats. First, the functional theory requires solid justification that is so far lacking. It is not so evident that territory is nothing more than a special tool people use and would be ready to abandon. Secondly, even if the theory is accepted, doubts arise as to whether all the traditional functions of territory can, in the current state of affairs, be assumed by a substitute and what this substitute would be. Thirdly, there are no historical ‘precedents’ of deterritorialized States to demonstrate the viability of the concept. Fourthly, other options are available to respond to the problems that the concept of deterritorialized State is supposed to resolve, especially the problem of disappearing States. As long as the concept remains insufficiently developed, these other options may seem preferable.

Keywords

Deterritorialization Disappearing States Montevideo Definition Territory State 

References

  1. Allott P (1990) Eunomia, New Order for a New World. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Alston P (2005) Non-State Actors and Human Rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Ash RW (2012) Is Palestine a ‘State’? A Response to Professor John Quigley’s Article, ‘The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue’. In Meloni C, Tognoni G (eds) Is There a Court for Gaza? A Test Bench for International Justice. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 441–460Google Scholar
  4. Arangio-Ruiz G (1996) On the Nature of the International Personality of the Holy See. Revue Belge de Droit International 32(2):355–369Google Scholar
  5. Basso KH (1996) Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language Among the Western Apache. University of New Mexico Press, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  6. Bederman DJ (2010) International Law Frameworks, 3rd edn. Thomson Reuters and Foundation Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Brölmann C (2007) Deterritorializing International Law: Moving Away from the Divide between National and International Law. In: Nollkaemper A, Nijman J (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 84–109Google Scholar
  8. Burkett M (2011) The Nation Ex-Situ: On Climate Change, Deterritorialized Nationhood and the Post-Climate Era. Climate Law 2:345–374Google Scholar
  9. Church JA, White NJ, Hunter JR (2006) Sea-Level Rise at Tropical Pacific and Indian Ocean Islands. Global and Planetary Change 53:155–168Google Scholar
  10. Cox N (2006) The Continuing Question of Sovereignty and the Sovereign Military Order of Jerusalem, of Rhodes and of Malta. Australian International Law Journal 13:211–232Google Scholar
  11. Craven M (2010) Statehood, Self-Determination, and Recognition. In: Evans MD (ed) International Law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 203–251Google Scholar
  12. Crawford J (2006) The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Crawford J (2012) Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Olivier FC (1954) The Sovereign Order of Malta in International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 3(2):217–232Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze G, Guattari F (1972) L’Anti-Oedipe. Capitalisme et Schizophrénie. Editions de Minuit, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Dennis TA (2002) The Principality of Sealand: Nation Building by Individuals. Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law 10(1):261–296Google Scholar
  17. Fischer BJ (1999) Albania at War, 1939–1945. Hurst & Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Gagain M (2007) Climate Change, Sea Level Rise, and Artificial Islands: Saving the Maldives’ Statehood and Maritime Claims Through the ‘Constitution of the Oceans’. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 23(1):77–120Google Scholar
  19. Grant TD (1999) Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and Its Discontents. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 37:403–457Google Scholar
  20. Hall W (1924) A Treatise on International Law. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrington AR (2016) Is there a Right to Territory in International Law? In: Smith JC (ed) Property and Sovereignty: Legal and Cultural Perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 59–79Google Scholar
  22. Herz JD (1957) Rise and Demise of the Territorial State. World Politics 9(4):473–493Google Scholar
  23. Henkin L (1995) International Law: Politics and Values (Developments in International Law, Vol 18). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  24. Herb GH, Kaplan DH (eds) (1999) Nested Identities: Nationalism, Territory, and Scale. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Higgins R (1963) Development of International Law through the Political Organs of the United Nations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobza A (1922) La République Tchécoslovaque et le Droit International. Revue Générale de Droit International public 29: 385–409Google Scholar
  27. Jain AG (2014) The 21st Century Atlantis: The International Law of Statehood and Climate Change-Induced Loss of Territory. Stanford Journal of International Law 50:1–50Google Scholar
  28. Kelsen H (1941–1942) The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review 55:44-70Google Scholar
  29. Kiss AC (1965) Répertoire de la Pratique Française en Matière de Droit International Public, Vol III. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Kittel J (2014) The Global ‘Disappearing Act’: How Island States Can Maintain Statehood in the Face of Disappearing Territory. Michigan State Law Review 5:1207–1250Google Scholar
  31. Klabbers J (2013) International Law. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Knight DB (1982) Identity and Territory: Geographical Perspectives on Nationalism and Regionalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 72(4):514–531Google Scholar
  33. Lawrence T (1895) The Principles of International Law. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyon AHE (2015) The Principality of Sealand, and Its Case for Sovereign Recognition. Emory International Law Review 29:637–671Google Scholar
  35. Mälksoo L (2003) Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR. A Study of the Tension between Normativity and Power in International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  36. Marek K (1968) Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law. Librairie Droz, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  37. McAdam J (2016) ‘Disappearing States’, Statelessness and the Boundaries of International Law. University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2010-2. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=1539766. Accessed 21 February 2017
  38. Mégret F (2009) Globalization. In: Wolfrum R (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol VI. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 493–503Google Scholar
  39. Mendelson MH (1972) States in the United Nations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 21:609–630Google Scholar
  40. Michaels R (2013) Globalisation and Law: Law Beyond the State. In: Banakar R, Travers M (eds) Law and Social Theory, 2nd edn. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 287–304Google Scholar
  41. Morss JR (2015) The International Legal Status of the Vatican/Holy See Complex. European Journal of International Law 26(4):927–946Google Scholar
  42. Mueggenberg B (2014) The Czecho-Slovak Struggle for Independence, 1914–1920. McFarland & Company, JeffersonGoogle Scholar
  43. Nevola G (2011) Politics, Identity, Territory. The ‘Strength’ and ‘Value’ of Nation-State, the Weakness of Regional Challenge. Universita dgli studi di Trento. Quaderno 58. http://web.unitn.it/files/download/8701/quaderno58.pdf. Accessed 21 February 2017
  44. Oliver S (2009) A New Challenge to International Law: The Disappearance of the Entire Territory of a State. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 16:209–243Google Scholar
  45. Quigley J (2012) The Palestine Declaration to the International Criminal Court: The Statehood Issue. In: Meloni C, Tognoni G (eds) Is there a Court for Gaza? A Test Bench for International Justice. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp 429–440Google Scholar
  46. Rayfuse R (2009) W(h)ither Tuvalu? Oceans Governance and Disappearing States, Ocean Policy Research Foundation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Islands and Oceans. https://www.spf.org/opri/publication/pdf/200903_ISBN978-4-88404-217-2.pdf, pp 91–103. Accessed 21 February 2017
  47. Rayfuse R (2011) International Law and Disappearing States – Maritime Zones and the Criteria for Statehood. Environmental Policy and Law 41(6):281–287Google Scholar
  48. Rossman G (2016) Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (But Still So Far): Assessing Liberland’s Claim of Statehood. Chicago Journal of International Law 17(1):306–339Google Scholar
  49. Ryngaert C (2011) The Legal Status of the Holy See. Goettingen Journal of International Law 3(3):829–859Google Scholar
  50. Ryngaert C (2015) Jurisdiction in International Law. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  51. Sassen S (2006) Territory, Authority, Rights. From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  52. Scelle G (1932) Précis de Droit des Gens: Principes et Systématique. Sirey, ParisGoogle Scholar
  53. Schnapper D (2001) De l’Etat-nation au Monde Transnational. Du Sens et de l’Utilité du Concept de Diaspora. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 17:9–34Google Scholar
  54. Shaw MN (1982) Territory in International Law. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 13:61–91Google Scholar
  55. Shaw MN (2008) International Law, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Starke JG, Shearer IA (eds) (1994) Starke’s International Law, 11th edn. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Sterio M (2011) A Grotian Moment: Changes in the Legal Theory of Statehood. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 39(2):209–237Google Scholar
  58. Storey D (2001) Territory. The Claiming of Space. Pearson Education Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Stoutenburg JG (2015) Disappearing Island States in International Law. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  60. Sumner BT (2004) Territorial Disputes at the International Court of Justice. Duke Law Journal 53:1779–1812Google Scholar
  61. Szigeti PD (2010) Territorial Bias in International Law: Attribution in State and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 19(2):311–355Google Scholar
  62. Táborský E (1946) Naše věc (Our Cause). Melantrich, PragueGoogle Scholar
  63. Talmon S (1999) Who is a Legitimate Government in Exile? Towards Normative Criteria for Governmental Legitimacy in International Law. In: Goodwin-Gill G, Talmon S (eds) The Reality of International Law. Essays in Honour of Ian Brownlie. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 499–537Google Scholar
  64. Talmon S (2001) Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Wong D (2013) Sovereignty Sunk? The Position of ‘Sinking States’ at International Law. Melbourne Journal of International Law 14:346–391Google Scholar
  66. Ziemele I (2005) State Continuity and Nationality: The Baltic States and Russia. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations