The Reach of Free Movement. A Defence of Court Discretion

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter argues that the reach of the fundamental freedoms and the content of the notion of a “restriction” cannot and should not be expressed in a rule-like manner. To the contrary, the fundamental freedoms function as overarching constitutional principles that both demand and legitimize the execution of court discretion. Public bodies, like courts, are vested with discretion in situations where rules are to be avoided, due to the magnitude of phenomena that are subject to regulation. Because of their stiffness, rules cannot serve the purposes of a legal system that pursues numerous, shifting and colliding objectives, such as the EU legal order. Any attempt to establish tests or categorizations that aim to define and exhaust the reach of the fundamental freedoms in a rule-like manner will obstruct the nature of the principles through which free movement is established, secured and developed, and the nature of the legal order in which they operate. The chapter explores the legal basis for court discretion, whether discretion is compatible with the principle of legal certainty, how discretion can fit a conception of the right to free movement as a personal individual right and the constitutional limitations to court discretion.

Keywords

Charter of Fundamental Rights Constitution Discretion Discrimination Free movement Individual rights Legal certainty Market access 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bekkedal T (2011) Article 106 TFEU is Dead. Long Live Article 106 TFEU! In: Szyszczack E, Davies J, Andenæs M, Bekkedal T (eds) Developments in Services of General Interest. TMC Asser Press, The Hague, pp. 61–102Google Scholar
  2. Bernard N (1996) Discrimination and Free Movement in EC Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45:82–108Google Scholar
  3. Braithwaite J (2002) Rules and principles. A Theory of Legal Certainty. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27:47–82Google Scholar
  4. Buendia Sierra JL (1999) Exclusive Rights and State Monopolies under EC Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies G (2003) Nationality Discrimination in the European Internal Market. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies G (2011) Discrimination and beyond in European economic and social law. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 18:7–28Google Scholar
  7. Davies G (2012a) Activism relocated. The self-restraint of the European Court of Justice in its national context. Journal of European public policy 19:76–91Google Scholar
  8. Davies G (2012b) The court’s jurisprudence on free movement of goods: Pragmatic presumptions, not philosophical principles. European Journal of Consumer Law 2:25–38Google Scholar
  9. de Búrca G (2002) Unpacking the Concept of Discrimination in EC and International Trade Law. In: Barnard C, Scott J (eds) The Law of the Single European Market. Hart, Oxford/ Portland, pp 181–196Google Scholar
  10. De Cecco F (2014) Fundamental Freedoms, Fundamental Rights, and the Scope of Free Movement Law. German Law Journal 15:383–406Google Scholar
  11. Dougan M (2010) Legal Developments. Journal of Common Market Studies 48:163–181Google Scholar
  12. Dworkin R (1963) Judicial Discretion. The Journal of Philosophy, 60:624–638Google Scholar
  13. Dworkin R (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  14. Enchelmaier S (2003) The awkward selling of a good idea, or a traditionalist interpretation of Keck. Yearbook of European Law 22:249–322Google Scholar
  15. Enchelmaier S (2004) Four Freedoms, how many principles. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24:155–172Google Scholar
  16. Enchelmaier S (2016) Four Freedoms, Ever More Principles? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36:1–26Google Scholar
  17. Eriksen CC (2011) The European Constitution, Welfare States and Democracy: The Four Freedoms vs National Administrative Discretion. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Flynn L (2001) Coming of age: The free movement of capital case law 1993–2002. Common Market Law Review 38:773–805Google Scholar
  19. Gormley LW (2005) The Genesis of the Rule of Reason in the Free Movement of Goods. In: Schrauwen A (ed) Rule of reason. Europa Law Publishing, Groningen, 19–34Google Scholar
  20. Halberstam D (2005) The Bride of Messina: Constitutionalism and Democracy in Europe. European Law Review, 30:775–801Google Scholar
  21. Hart HLA (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Hilson C (1999) Discrimination in Community Free Movement Law. European Law Review 24:445–462Google Scholar
  23. Jackson V (2015) Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality. The Yale Law Journal 124:3094–3196Google Scholar
  24. Jansson MS, Kalimo H (2014) De minimis meets “market access”: Transformations in the substance – and the syntax – of EU free movement law? Common Market Law Review, 51:523–558Google Scholar
  25. Kelsen H (1998) Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Paulson BL, Paulson SL (translation). Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumm M (2010) The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review. Law & Ethics of Human Rights 4:140–175Google Scholar
  27. Lianos I (2010) Shifting Narratives in the European Internal Market: Efficient restrictions of Trade and the Nature of “Economic” Integration. European Business Law Review 21:705–760Google Scholar
  28. Lindahl H (2008) Discretion and Public Policy: Timing the Unity and Divergence of Legal Orders. In: Prechal S, van Roermund B (eds) The Coherence of EU Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 291–313Google Scholar
  29. Maduro M P (1998) We, the Court. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Mancini F (1989) The making of a constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review 26:595–614Google Scholar
  31. Meulman J, de Waele H (2006) A retreat from Säger? Legal issues of Economic Integration 33:207–228Google Scholar
  32. Neergaard U (1998) Competition & Competences. DJØFGoogle Scholar
  33. Nic Shuibhne N (2013) The Coherence of EU Free Movement Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver P (1999) Some further reflections on the scope of Articles 28–30 (ex 30–36) EC. Common Market Law Review 36:783–806Google Scholar
  35. Oliver P, Roth W-H (2004) The internal market and the four freedoms. Common Market Law Review 41:407–441Google Scholar
  36. Ortino F (2002) Basic Legal Instruments for the Liberalisation of Trade. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Petersman E-U (2005) International Trade Law, Human Rights and Theories of Justice. In: Charnovitz S, Steger D P, Van den Bossche P (eds) Law in the Service of Human Dignity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 44–57Google Scholar
  38. Petersman E-U (2012) International Economic Law in the 21st Century. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Rasmussen H (1986) On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking. Martinus Nijhoff, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  40. Reich N (1994) The “November Revolution” of the European Court of Justice: Keck, Meng and Audi revisited. Common Market Law Review, 31:459–492Google Scholar
  41. Roth W-H (2002) The European Court of Justice’s Case Law on Freedom to Provide Services: Is Keck Relevant? In: Andenas M, Roth W-H (eds) Services and Free Movement in EU Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  42. Schauer F (1991) Playing by the Rules. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Schauer F (1995) Giving Reasons. Stanford Law Review 47:633–659Google Scholar
  44. Selznick P (1969) Law Society and Industrial Justice. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Snell J (2002) Goods and Services in EC Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Snell J (2010) The notion of market access: A concept or a slogan? Common Market Law Review 47: 437–472Google Scholar
  47. Spaventa E (2004) From Gebhard to Carpenter: Towards a (non-)economic European Constitution. Common Market Law Review, 41:743–773Google Scholar
  48. Weatherill S (2009) Free Movement of Goods. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58: 985–993.Google Scholar
  49. Weiler J H H (1999) The Constitution of the Common Market Place: Text and Context in the Evolution of the Free Movement of Goods. In: Craig P, de Búrca G (eds) The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 349–376Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser press and the authors 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations