CAS 2013/A/3365 Juventus FC v. Chelsea FC and CAS 2013/A/3366 A.S. Livorno Calcio S.p.A. v. Chelsea FC, Award of 21 January 2015

Chapter

Abstract

On 21 January 2015, the CAS rendered its award in the latest episode of the Mutu case. The core legal question raised concerned the interpretation of Article 14(3) of the FIFA RSTP, in their 2001 version, and more precisely whether, in the event a player is dismissed by his club for having consumed cocaine, the new club bears the duty to pay the compensation due by the player to his former club. Having won one of the most high profile cases in the history of the CAS, Chelsea FC has been desperately hunting for its money (as far as the US) since the rendering of the award. Thus, the English football club had the idea to turn against Mutu’s first employers after his dismissal in 2005, Juventus and Livorno, with success in front of the FIFA DRC, but, as we will see, not before the CAS. This award is extremely important for lawyers involved in disputes arising out of transfers in football as it provides a robust justification for the need to take into account the EU law context of the adoption of the FIFA RSTP in interpreting their provisions.

Keywords

CAS Bosman ruling EU law FIFA RSTP International sports law Lex sportiva Arbitration 

References

  1. Beffa L (2011) Challenge of international arbitration awards in Switzerland for lack of independence and/or impartiality of an arbitrator—is it time to change the approach? ASA Bull 29:598–606Google Scholar
  2. Czarnota P (2013) FIFA transfer rules and unilateral termination without “Just Cause”. Berkeley J Entertain Sports Law 2:1–47Google Scholar
  3. Duval A (2013) Lex Sportiva: a playground for transnational law. Eur Law J 19:822–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duval A (2015) The court of arbitration for sport and EU law: chronicle of an encounter. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22:224–255Google Scholar
  5. Duval A (2016a) The FIFA regulations on the status and transfer of players: transnational law-making in the shadow of Bosman. In: Duval A, Van Rompuy B (eds) The legacy of Bosman: revisiting the relationship between EU law and sport, Springer, T.M.C. ASSER Press, The Hague, pp 81–116Google Scholar
  6. Duval A, Van Rompuy B (2016b) Protecting athletes’ right to a fair trial through EU competition law: the Pechstein case. In: Paulussen C et al (eds) Fundamental rights in international and European law, Springer, T.M.C. ASSER Press, The Hague, pp 245–278Google Scholar
  7. Dworkin R (1977) Taking rights seriously. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Latty F (2007) La Lex Sportiva: Recherche sur le droit transnational. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Latty F (2011) La Lex FIFA. In: Maisonneuve M (ed) Droit et Coupe du Monde, Economica, Paris, pp 9–27Google Scholar
  10. Ost F, Van de Kerchove M (2002) De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit. Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  11. Parrish R (2015) Article 17 of the FIFA Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players. Compatibility with EU law. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22:256–282Google Scholar
  12. Pearson G (2015) Sporting justifications under EU free movement and competition law: the case of the football ‘transfer system. Eur Law J 21:220–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schiff Berman P (2012) Global legal pluralism. A jurisprudence of law beyond borders. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Van den Bogaert S (2005) Practical regulation of the mobility of sportsmen in the EU post Bosman. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  15. von Segesser G (2012) Equality of information and impartiality of arbitrators. In: Wautelet P, Kruger T, Coppens G (eds) The practice of arbitration: essays in honour of Hans van Houtte. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 45–51Google Scholar
  16. Venzke I (2013) How interpretation makes international law: on semantic change and normative twists. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Weatherill S (2003) “Fair Play Please!”: recent developments in the application of EC law to sport. Common Market Law Rev 40:51–93Google Scholar
  18. Zimmerman M (2015) Vertragsstabilität im internationalen Fussball. Dike Verlag, ZürichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.T.M.C ASSER Institute for European and International LawThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations