International Refugees and Irregular Migrants: Caught in the Mundane Shadow of Crisis

Chapter
Part of the Netherlands Yearbook of International Law book series (NYIL, volume 44)

Abstract

This chapter proposes that international legal scholarship may, in its encounter with the phenomenon of migration, benefit from acquiring a sensitivity to the political economy of the distinction between crisis and the mundane. It does so by looking at two particular fields of international migration: refugee law and the law of irregular migration. The first enjoys a large degree of attention from international lawyers, while the other enjoys almost none. Moreover, within these two categories of migrants, international legal scholars tend to ‘see’ some subjects, such as refugee crises and human trafficking, and ‘not see’ others, such as the legal limbo of the ‘temporary’ refugee camp and the daily life of the irregular migrant. This chapter argues that the difference in attention international legal scholars give to one or the other category of persons is the product not of the jurisdiction or the reach of international law, but rather of ideological and epistemological biases. These biases cause international lawyers to ‘see’ crisis, and to ‘not see’ that which is not crisis—that which is quotidian, mundane, or ‘normal’, in the ‘everyday’ sense of the word. By focusing on the crisis/mundane distinction and the privileging of ‘crisis’, this chapter helps to identify the specific focus and boundaries of the epistemic bias of international migration law scholarship.

Keywords

Refugees Refugee camps Irregular migrants Crisis International law Human rights 

References

  1. Agamben G (2005) State of exception (transl. Attrell K). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Algier M (2011) Managing the undesirables: refugee camps and humanitarian government (transl. Fernbach D). Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaya-Castro JM (2011) Illegality regimes and the ongoing transformation of contemporary citizenship. Eur J Leg Stud 4:137–161Google Scholar
  4. Bantekas I, Oette L (2013) International human rights law and practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu P (1980) The logic of practice. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Charlesworth H (2002) International law: a discipline of crisis. Mod Law Rev 65:377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlesworth H (2011) Talking to ourselves: should international lawyers take a break from feminism? In: Kouyo S, Pearson Z (eds) Between resistance and compliance? Feminist perspectives on international law in an era of anxiety and terror. Hart Publishers, Oxford, pp 17–32Google Scholar
  8. Cholewinski R, Perruchoud R, MacDonald E (eds) (2007) International migration law: developing paradigms and key challenges. TMC Asser Press, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornelisse G (2010) Immigration detention and human rights: rethinking territorial sovereignty. Brill, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornelisse G (2011) A new articulation of human rights, or why the European Court of Human Rights should think beyond Westphalian sovereignty. In: Dembour MB, Kelly T (eds) Are human rights for migrants? Routledge, Abingdon, pp 99–119Google Scholar
  11. Dembour MB, Kelly T (eds) (2011) Are human rights for migrants? Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  12. Den Heijer M (2012) Europe and extraterritorial asylum. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorsett S, McVeigh S (2012) Jurisdiction. Routledge-Cavendish, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Dow M (2005) American gulag: inside U.S. immigration prisons. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards A (2012) Temporary protection, derogation and the 1951 Refugee Convention. Melb J Int Law 13:595–635Google Scholar
  16. Ferris E (2008) Internal displacement and the right to seek asylum. Ref Surv Q 27:76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gammeltoft-Hansen T (2013) Access to asylum: international refugee law and the globalisation of migration control. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Glynn I (2012) The genesis and development of Article 1 of the 1951 Refugee Convention. J Ref Stud 25:134–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant S (2011) Irregular migration and frontier deaths: acknowledging a right to identity. In: Dembour MB, Kelly T (eds) Are human rights for migrants?. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 48–70Google Scholar
  20. Halley J et al (2006) From the international to the local in feminist legal responses to rape, prostitution/sex work, and sex trafficking: four studies in contemporary governance feminism. Harv J Law Gend 29:336–423Google Scholar
  21. Hardt M, Negri A (2000) Empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrell-Bond B (2002) Can humanitarian work with refugees be humane? Hum Rights Q 24:51–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrell-Bond B, Verdirame G (2005) Rights in exile: Janus faced humanitarianism. Berghahn Books, New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Hathaway J (2012) Refugees and asylum. In: Opeskin B, Perruchoud R, Redpath-Cross J (eds) Foundations of international migration law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 177–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hathaway J, Neve R (1997) Making international refugee law relevant again: a proposal for collectivized and solution-oriented protection. Harv Hum Rights J 10:115–211Google Scholar
  26. Huysmans J (2002) The European Union and the securitization of migration. J Common Mark Stud 38:751–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kagan M (2012) The UN ‘surrogate state’ and the foundations of refugee policy in the Middle East. University of California Davis J Int Law Policy 18:307–342Google Scholar
  28. Kennedy D (1976) Form and substance in private law adjudication. Harv Law Rev 89:1685–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennedy D (1984) International refugee protection. Hum Rights Q 8:1–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kennedy D (1987) International legal structures. Nomos, Baden–BadenGoogle Scholar
  31. Kennedy D (1999) The disciplines of international law and policy. Leiden J Int Law 12:9–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kennedy D (2004) The dark sides of virtue: reassessing international humanitarianism. Princeton University Press, Princeton and OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Kobach K (2008) Attrition through enforcement: a rational approach to illegal immigration. Tulsa J Comp Int Law 15:155–207Google Scholar
  34. Koskenniemi M (2005) From apology to utopia: the structure of international legal argument, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorde A (2007) Sister outsider: essays and speeches. Crossing Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. McAdam J (2012) Climate change, forced migration, and international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mutua M (2001) Savages, victims, and saviors: the metaphor of human rights. Harv Int Law J 42:201–245Google Scholar
  38. Olsen F (1983) The family and the market: a study of ideology and legal reform. Harv Law Rev 96:1497–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Opeskin B, Perruchoud R, Redpath-Cross J (2012) Conceptualising international migration law. In: Opeskin B, Perruchoud R, Redpath-Cross J (eds) Foundations of international migration law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Otto D (2009) The exile of inclusion: reflections on gender issues in international law over the last decade. Melb J Int Law 10:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oudejans N (2011) Asylum: a philosophical inquiry into the international protection of refugees. BoxPress, Den Bosch. http://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=116233. Accessed 29 Nov 2013
  42. Sarat A, Kearns T (eds) (1995) Law in everyday life. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  43. Schotel B (2012) On the right of exclusion: law, ethics and immigration policy. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Skouteris T (2009) The notion of progress in international law discourse. TMC Asser Press, The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spijkerboer T (2007) The human costs of border control. Eur J Migr Law 9:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor S (2008) Offshore barriers to asylum-seeker movement: the exercise of power without responsibility? In: McAdam J (ed) Forced migration, human rights and security. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Verdirame G (2011) The UN and human rights: who guards the guardians?. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Verdirame G, Pobjoy JM (2013) The end of refugee camps? In: Juss S (ed) The Ashgate research companion to migration law, theory and policy. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  49. Willen S (2007) Toward a critical phenomenology of ‘illegality’: state power, criminalization, and abjectivity among undocumented migrant workers in Tel Aviv, Israel. Int Migr 45:8–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press and the authors 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Migration and Diversity Centre, School of LawVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations