Advertisement

DNA Barcoding Darwin’s Meadow

A Twenty-first-century Botanical Inventory at Historic Down House
  • Karen E. James
Part of the New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education book series (NDMS)

Abstract

In June 1855 Charles Darwin wrote to Joseph Hooker that he intended to survey the 13-acre hay meadow (Great Pucklands) near Down House, and reported with delight – ‘Hurrah! Hurrah!’ – that he had identified his first grass.2

Keywords

Seed Plant Natural History Museum Linnean Society Angiosperm Phylogeny Group British Plant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CBOL Plant Working Group. (2009). A DNA barcode for land plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(31), 12794–12797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chase, M. W., Cowan, R. S., Hollingsworth, P. M., van den Berg, M., Mandrinan, S., Petersen, G.,... Carine, M. (2007). A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon, 56(2), 295.Google Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. R. (1857). On natural selection. In R. C. Stauffer (Ed.), Charles Darwin’s natural selection: Being the second part of his big species book written from 1856 to 1858. Cambridge, UK: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life (1st ed.). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  6. Darwin, C. R., & Wallace, A. R. (1858, August). On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 3, 46–50.Google Scholar
  7. Hajibabaei, M., DeWaard, J. R., Ivanova, N. V., Ratnasingham, S., Dooh, R. T., Kirk, S. L.,... Hebert, P. D. N. (2005). Critical factors for assembling a high volume of DNA barcodes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1462), 1959–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henslow, J. S. (1829, 1835). A catalogue of British plants, arranged according to the natural system, with the synonyms of De Candolle, Smith, Lindley, and Hooker. Cambridge: Deighton & Stevenson.Google Scholar
  9. Hooker, W. J. (1838). The British flora: Comprising the phaenogamous, or flowering plants, and the ferns (4th ed.). London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown & Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hooker, W. J., & Arnott, G. A. W. (1855). The British flora: Comprising the phaenogamous, or flowering plants, and the ferns (7th ed.). London: Longman, Brown, Green, & Longmans.Google Scholar
  11. Hollingsworth, M., Clark, A. A., Forrest, L. L., Richardson, J., Pennington, R. T., Long, D. G.,... & Hollingsworth, P. M. (2009). Selecting barcoding loci for plants: Evaluation of seven candidate loci with species-level sampling in three divergent groups of land plants. Molecular Ecology Resources, 9, 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hopkins, D., & James, K. E. (2010). Tree school: A new innovation for science and education. In P. L. Nimis & R. Vignes Lebbe (Eds.). Tools for identifying biodiversity: Progress and problems (pp. 395–400).Google Scholar
  13. Kress, W. J., & Erickson, D. L. (2007). A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE, 2(6), e508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kress, W. J., Erickson, D. L., Jones, F. A., Swenson, N. G., Perez, R., Sanjur, O., & Bermingham, E., (2009). Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(44), 18621–18626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moore M. J., Bell C. D., Soltis P. S., & Soltis D. E. (2007). Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 19363–19368.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, A. R., Pryer, K. M., Schuettpelz, E., Korall, P. Schneider, H., & Wolf, P. G. (2006). A classification for extant ferns. Taxon, 55, 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stagg, B. C., & Donkin, M. (2013). Teaching botan ical identification to adults: experiences of the UK participatory science project ‘Open Air Laboratories’. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stace, C. A. (1997). New flora of the British Isles (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Walther, G. R. (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Towards a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47, 2–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen E. James
    • 1
  1. 1.Mount Desert Island Biological LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations