Advertisement

Successful and ‘Transferable’ Practice

  • Mellita Jones
  • Josephine Ryan

Abstract

Politicians’ questions about whether there is a blueprint for successful teacher education are customarily resisted by those in teacher education. The response might be “Teacher education is a complex activity and straight-forward formulae are not available.” The contributions to this volume present evidence of this complexity. Each illuminates a particular aspect of teacher education, presenting points of tension, perhaps contradiction, between their points of view.

Keywords

Teacher Education Teacher Education Program Professional Learning Information Communication Technology Reflective Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AITSL. (2013). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/Standards/AllStandards
  2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clift, R., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The Report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 309–337). London: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69–109). American Educational Research Association publication. Mahwah: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Corley, A., & Eades, E. (2004). Becoming critically reflective practitioners: Academics’ and students’ reflections on the issues involved. Human Resource Development International, 7 (1), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2005). Professional development schools. Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Darling Hammond, L. (2006a). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence. In D. Hartley & M. Whitehead (Eds.), Teacher Education. Major themes in Education. Vol. 5 Globalisation, Standards and teacher education (pp. 95–124). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006b). Powerful teacher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006c). Constructing 21 st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57 (3), 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling-Hamond, L. (2010). The case for university-based teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. McIntyre, & K. Demers, (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts (pp. 333–346). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  11. DEECD. (2012). New directions for school leadership and the teaching profession discussion paper. Melbourne: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Retrieved from http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/commrel/about/teachingprofession.pdf Google Scholar
  12. DEECD. (2011). School centres for teaching excellence. Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/about/programs/partnerships/discussionpaper.pdf
  13. Department for Education (DfE). (2012). Teachers’ standards. Retrieved from http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/t/teachers%20standards%20information.pdf
  14. Dinham, S. (2013). The quality teaching movement in Australia encounters difficult terrain: A personal perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 57 (2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  17. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training. (2007). Top of the class. Report on the inquiry into teacher education. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/evt/teachereduc/report/front.pdf
  18. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC horizon report: 2012 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, M., & McLean, K. J. (2012). Personalising learning in teacher education through the use of technology. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (1). Doi: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n1.1Google Scholar
  20. Kim, S., Mims, C., & Holmes, K. (2006). An introduction to current trends and benefits of mobile wireless technology use in higher education. AACE Journal, 14 (1), 77–100.Google Scholar
  21. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (1), 60–70.Google Scholar
  22. Korthagen, F., & Kessels, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28 (4), 4–17. DOI:  10.3102/0013189X028004004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71 (4), 476–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships. Beyond determined efforts of inspired individuals. Canberra: Teaching Australia. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/144200
  26. Kumashiro, K. (2010). Seeing the bigger picture: Troubling movements to end teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1–2), 56–65. DOI:  10.1177/0022487109347318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Neal, D. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of a university-school partnership on their preservice practicum education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). La Trobe University, Bundoora. Retrieved from http://arrow.latrobe.edu.au:8080/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.9/154671 Google Scholar
  30. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS). (2013). National board standards. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/national-board-standards
  31. Nuttall, J., Murray, S., Seddon, T., & Mitchell, J. (2006). Teacher education in Australia: Charting new directions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34 (3), 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parliament of Victoria, Education and Training Committee. (2005). Step up, step in, step out. Report on the suitability of pre-service teacher training in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
  33. Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11 (1), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29 (1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reid, J. (2011). A practice turn for teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (4), 293–310. DOI:  10.1080/1359866X.2011.614688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swan, K., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. e -mentor, 2 (24). Retrieved from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul_v2.php?numer=24&id=543
  38. Teach for Australia (2013). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.teachforaustralia.org/content/faqs-1
  39. Tovey, J. (2013, September 1). Teach for Australia fastracks new breed in classrooms. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/teach-for-australia-fastracksnew-breed-in-classrooms-20130901-2sycc.html Google Scholar
  40. Ure, C. (2009). Practicum partnerships: exploring models of practicum organisation in teacher education for a standards-based profession. Parkville, Vic: University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.altc.edu.au/project-practicum-partnerships-exploring-melbourne-2009 Google Scholar
  41. Kline, J., White, S., & Lock, G. (2013). The rural practicum: Preparing a quality teacher workforce for rural and regional Australia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 28 (3), 1–13. Retrieved from http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/28-3.pdf Google Scholar
  42. Zeichner, K. (2010a). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 (1–2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zeichner, K. (2010b). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1544–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mellita Jones
    • 1
  • Josephine Ryan
    • 2
  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations