Reflective Practice in the Online Space

  • Mellita Jones


This chapter reports on the use of an online discussion forum to develop pre-service teachers’ critical reflection on their own teaching practice during the practicum component of their teacher education program. Reflection is considered a key aspect of ongoing learning and development for teachers, but can be reduced to a descriptive-type task rather than one through which learning about teaching is more likely to occur.


Teacher Education Teacher Education Program Online Discussion Critical Reflection Reflective Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2012). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from
  2. Bernard, H., & Ryan, G. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed.). Frenchs Forest: Longman-Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Corley, A., & Eades, E. (2004). Becoming critically reflective practitioners: ‘Academics and students’ reflections on the issues involved. Human Resource Development International, 7 (1), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21 st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57 (3), 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department for Education [DfE]. (2013). Teachers’ standards. Retrieved from
  8. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Hammond, M. (2005). A review of recent papers on online discussion in teaching and learning in higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9 (3), 9–23.Google Scholar
  10. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training. (2007). Top of the class. Report on the inquiry into teacher education. [Electronic version]. Retrieved from
  11. Korthagen, F. (2001). Teacher education: A problematic enterprise in linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koballa, T., & Tippins, D. (2001). Portraits of professional development models in science teacher education: a synthesis of perspectives and issues. In D. Lavoie, & W. Roth (Eds.), Models of science teacher preparation (pp. 213–224). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71 (4), 476–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: in search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53 (1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: understanding teaching and learning about teaching. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K., (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-anlaysis and review of online learning studies. Washington D.C.: US Department of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development.Google Scholar
  18. Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards [NBPTS]. (2002). What teachers should know and be able to do. Retrieved from
  20. Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (2004). Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to improve student learning. California: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  21. Parliament of Victoria, Education and Training Committee. (2005). Step up, step in, step out. Report on the suitability of pre-service teacher training in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer.Google Scholar
  22. Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11 (1), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, M. & Ryan, J. (2014). Learning in the practicum: Engaging pre-service teachers in reflective practice in the online space. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 132–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryan, J., Jones, M, McLean, A., & Walta, C. (2012). Preservice teacher education partnerships: Creating an effective practicum model for rural and regional preservice teachers. Final Report 2012. Australian Government Office of Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from
  26. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  27. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Swan, K., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. e -mentor, 2 (24). Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mellita Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations