Qualities of Education

A Diversity of Perspectives and Cases, Worldwide
  • Diane Brook Napier
Part of the The World Council of Comparative Education Societies book series (CIEDV)

Abstract

Conceptions of the quality of education are as old as education itself. All education seeks to achieve some form or version of quality even if the objectives of education range from those promoting development and amelioration of societal conditions, to those aiming to improve the capacities of individuals and groups, to those seeking to use education as an instrument of subjugation or control. In other words, quality is a highly complex concept, open to many interpretations and operationalisations. Quality, per se, defies simple definition.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson-Levitt, K. (Ed.) (2003). Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory (pp. 51–74). New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  2. Arnove, R. F. (2013). Introduction: Reframing comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (4th edition). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (Eds.) (2004). The post-colonial studies reader, part fourteen: education. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on america’s public schools. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Bray, M. (2013). Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. In R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, & S. Franz (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (4th edition). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (Eds.) (2014). Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong, and Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Cowen, R. (2006). Acting comparatively upon the educational world: Puzzles and possibilities. Oxford Review of Education, 32 (5), 561 – 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crossley, M. (2009). Rethinking context in comparative education. In R. Cowen, & A. M. Kazamias (Eds.), International handbook of comparative education (pp. 1173 – 1187). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crossley, M. (2010). Context matters in educational research and international development: Learning from the small states experience. Prospects, 40, 421 – 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engel, L. C., & Williams, J. H. (Guest Eds.) (2013). The globalisation of assessment: A forum on international tests of student performance. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(3).Google Scholar
  11. Global Education First Initiative (GEFI) (2012). Global Education First Initiative: The UN Secretary- General’s Global Initiative on Education.UNESCO http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/globaleducation-first-initiative-gefi/ accessed January 30, 2014.
  12. Hartshorne,K. (1992). Crisis and challenge: Black education 1910–1990. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lawn, M. (Ed.) (2013). The rise of data in education systems: Collection, visualization and use. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, W. O., Napier, D. B., & Manzon, M. (2014). Does context still matter? the dialectics of comparative education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levin H. (2012). More than just test scores. Prospects, 42 (3), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Macauley, T. (1835/1979). Speeches of Lord Macauley with his minute on Indian education. Oxford: Oxford University Press (with Introduction and Notes by G.M. Young, 1979).Google Scholar
  17. Mandela, N. (1995). Long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. Boston: Little Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  18. McGinn, N. F., & Cummings, W. K. (1997). Introduction. In W. K. Cummings, & N. F. McGinn (Eds.), International handbook of education and development: preparing schools, students and nations for the twenty-first century. Exeter: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, H-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  20. Napier, D. B. (2003). Transformations in South Africa: Policies and practices from ministry to classroom. In K. Anderson Levitt (Ed.), Local meanings, global schooling: Anthropology and world culture theory (pp. 51–74). New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  21. Napier, D. B. (2005). Implementing educational transformation policies: Investigating issues of ideal versus real in developing countries. In D. P. Baker, & A. W. Wiseman, (Eds.), Global trends in educational policy (pp. 59–98). International Perspectives on Education and Society, 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  22. Napier, D. B. (2009). South Africa’s struggles to compete globally, and to meet internal educational needs. Curriculum and Teaching, 24 (2), 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Napier, D. B. (2010). African socialism, post-colonial development, and education: Change and continuity in the post-socialist era. In I. Silova (Ed.), Post-socialism is not dead: (Re)reading the global in comparative education (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Volume 14). (pp. 369–399). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  24. Napier, D. B., & Majhanovich, S. (Eds.)(2013). Education, dominance and identity. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (Eds.)(2004). Educational policy borrowing: Historical perspectives. Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  26. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2014). Cross-national policy borrowing: Understanding reception and translation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(2), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.) (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Torres, C. A. (2013). Global Citizenship Educe of national and transnational socies, WCCES President. Newsletter of WCCES – Fall 2013 No.1 http://www.wcces.com/WCCES%20Newsletter/Newsletter_WCCES_2013_Fall_no1.pdf accessed January 30, 2014.
  29. United Nations (2007a). EFA global monitoring report- education for all by 2015- will we make it? UNESCO: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. United Nations (2007b). Millennium development goals report. New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar
  31. United Nations (2007c). The least developed countries report 2007: Knowledge, technological learning and innovation for development. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  32. Wiseman, A. W. & Baker, D. P. (2005). The worldwide explosion of internationalized education policy. In D. P. Baker, & A. W. Wiseman, ( Eds. ), Global trends in educational policy ( International Perspectives on Education and Society, Volume 6). ( pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  33. Zajda, J. ( Ed.) (2005 ). The international handbook of globalization and educational policy research. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Zajda, J., & Freeman, K. (Eds.), Race, ethnicity and gender in education: cross-cultural understandings. Globalization, Comparative Education and Policy Research, 6, 31–58. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Zajda, J., & Rust, V. ( Eds. ) (2009 ). Globalization, policy, and comparative research: Discourses of globalization ( Vol. 5 ). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Zajda, J., Daun, H., & Saha, L. ( Eds. ) ( 2009). Nation building, identity, and citizenship education: Cross cultural perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Brook Napier
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GeorgiaUnited States

Personalised recommendations