Energy and Environment Performance Task

  • Robert Mayes
  • James Myers

Abstract

We have presented an overview of the QR STEM project so STEM professional development leaders and teachers reading this have a sense of the big picture, including our goals, methods, and expected outcomes. We now turn to providing a detailed discussion of leading teachers in developing a performance task within the context of energy and environment using the Understanding by Design assessment framework (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005).

Keywords

Performance Task Energy Resource Design Tool Grand Challenge Renewable Energy Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ausubel, J. H. (1996). Can technology spare the earth. American Scientist, 84, 166–178.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, J. (2004). Making sustainable development evaluation work. Sustainable Development, 12, 200–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2006). A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Chertow, M. R. (2001). The IPAT equation and its variants: Changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DePaolo, D. J., & Orr, F. M. (2008). Geoscience research for our energy future. Physics Today, 61, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrlich, P., & Holdren, J. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997). Minds of our own. Annenberg Learner. http://learner.org/resources/series26.html
  9. Hilbert, D. (1901). Problemes mathematiques. Google Scholar
  10. National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. National Research Council. (2005). Creating a disaster resilient America: Grand challenges in science and technology: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. National Science Teachers Association. (1996). Pathways to science education standards. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  13. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  14. Omenn, G. S. (2006). Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science, 314, 1696–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rios-Velazquez, C., Robles-Suarez, R., Gonzalez-Negron, A. J., & Baez-Santos, I. (2006). The delta cooperative model: a dynamic and innovative team-work activity to develop research skills in microbiology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 7, 20–27.Google Scholar
  16. Schellnhuber, H.J., & Sahagian, D. (2002). The twenty-three GAIM questions. Global Change Newsletter, 49, 20–21.Google Scholar
  17. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on Mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  18. Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P. A., Moore III, B., … Wasson, RJ. (2004). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Varmus, H., Klausner, R., Zerhouni, E., Acharya, T., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Grand Challenges in Global Health. Science, 302(5644), 398–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Mayes
    • 1
  • James Myers
    • 2
  1. 1.Georgia Southern UniversityUSA
  2. 2.University of WyomingUSA

Personalised recommendations