Transferring Standards

Judging “This-Now” by Reference to “That-Then”
  • Richard Kimbell
Part of the International Technology Education Studies book series (ITES)


Assessment hurdles in schools have proliferated dramatically in the last decade. The US Accounting Office estimates that between 2002 and 2008 assessment spending in the USA rose from $1.9 to $5.3 billion, and in England the Times reported that: “English children are tested longer, harder and younger than anywhere else in the world” (Stewart, 2010).


Associative Memory Comparative Judgement Transfer Standard Judgement Process Importance Statement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brooks, V. (2012). Marking as judgment. Research Papers in Education, 27(1), 63-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garry, J., McCool, M., & O’Neill, S. (2005). Are moderators moderate? Testing the ‘anchoring and adjustment’ hypothesis in the context of marking politics exams. Politics, 25, 191-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction – Heuristics and biases: Then and now. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 1-17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gladwell, M. (2007). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. Penguin Books London.Google Scholar
  5. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Allen Lane / Penguin: London, New York, Toronto.Google Scholar
  6. Kimbell, R. (1997). Assessing technology: International trends in curriculum and assessment. Buckingham: Open Univ Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kimbell, R., Wheeler, T., Stables, K., Shepard, T., Martin, F., Davies, D., Pollitt, A., & Whitehouse, G. (2009). E-scape portfolio assessment Phase 3 report. Technology Education Research Unit (TEWRU) Goldsmiths University of London. Available at,5882,en.php
  8. Laming, D. (2004). Human judgement: The eye of the beholder. London: Thomson.Google Scholar
  9. Morgan, C. (1996). The teacher as examiner: The case of mathematics coursework. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 3, 353-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pollitt, A. (2004, June). Let’s stop marking exams. Paper presented at the International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA) Conference, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  11. Pollitt, A., Derrick, K., & Lynch, D. (2010). Single level tests of KS2 writing: The method of paired comparative judgement. Malmsbury Wiltshire UK: TAG Developments; BLI Education.Google Scholar
  12. QCDA. (2011). Importance of Geography key stage 3. Retrieved 28 January, 2011, from
  13. Stewart, W. (2010). Exam fee spending soars by £17.7m. Times Education Supplement. Retrieved from
  14. Suto, I., & Greatorex, J. (2008) What goes through an examiner’s mind? Using verbal protocols to gain insights into the GCSE marking process. British Education Research Journal, 34(2), 213-133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wiliam, D. (1992). Some technical issues in assessment: A user’s guide. British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 2, 11-20.Google Scholar
  17. Wiliam, D. (1996). Standards in examinations: A matter of trust? The Curriculum Journal, 7, 293-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson, T. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Kimbell
    • 1
  1. 1.Technology Education Research Unit, Goldsmiths CollegeLondon UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations