Advertisement

Transfer in Technology Through a Concept-Context Approach

  • Marc J. de Vries
Part of the International Technology Education Studies book series (ITES)

Abstract

One of the challenges of technology education is to keep the content of the curriculum up to date. This challenge is particular for technology education, as technological developments tend to go increasingly faster. Of course, other disciplines develop as well, but the increase of new subject matter in, for instance, science education, is by no means as great as in technology education.

Keywords

Science Education Technology Education Abstract Concept Design Activity School Building 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1063-1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frederik, I., Sonneveld, W., & Vries, M. J. de (2011). Teaching and learning the nature of technical artifacts. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(3), 277-290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ginns, I. S., Norton, S. J., & McRobbie, C. J. (2005). Adding value to the teaching and learning of design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(1), 47-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hennessy, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koski, M.-I., & de Vries, M. J. (2012). Primary pupils’ thoughts about systems: An exploratory study. In T. Ginner, J. Hallström, & M. Hulten (Eds.), Technology education in the 21st century. Proceedings of the PATT 26 Conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 26-30 June 2012 (pp. 253-261). Stockholm/Linkoping: KTH/Linköping University.Google Scholar
  6. MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  7. Parkinson, E. (2001). Teacher knowledge and understanding of design and technology for children in the 3-11 age group: A study focusing on aspects of structures. Journal of Technology Education, 13(1), 44-58.Google Scholar
  8. Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2006). The use of “contexts” as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087-1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  10. Vries, M. J. de (2005). Teaching about technology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc J. de Vries
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations