Advertisement

Blended Learning in Health Professional Education

The Intersection of Technology, Pedagogy and Content
  • Sandra West
  • Melinda J. Lewis
  • Mary-Helen Ward
Part of the Practice, Education, Work and Society book series (PEWS)

Abstract

The impact of technology in society and particularly in educational settings is extensive, challenging traditional notions of teacher-centred approaches to learning, learners and learning locations. Now embedded within the higher education sector are (a) new learning technologies including software such as learning management systems and e-portfolios, (b) collaborative learning approaches such as case- and problem-based learning, and (c) professional demands for curricula that facilitate both critical and inquiry-based learning.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bluic, A-M., Ellis, R., Goodyear, P., & Hendres, D. M. (2011). The role of social identification as university student in learning: Relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ellis, R., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., et al. (2009). Educating the net generation: A handbook of findings for practice and policy. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Knight, P., & Trowler, P. (1999). It takes a village to raise a child: Mentoring and the socialization of new entrants to the academic professions. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 7(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Oldland, E. (2011). Transition from clinical manager to university lecturer: A self-reflective case study. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Shreeve, A. (2011). Being in two camps: Conflicting experiences for practice-based academics. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. What is TPACK? (2011). Retrieved from http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/tpack/what-is-tpack/

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra West
    • 1
  • Melinda J. Lewis
    • 2
  • Mary-Helen Ward
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Nursing & MidwiferyThe University of SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery & Sydney e-learningThe University of SydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Sydney e-learningThe University of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations