Advertisement

The Fortress, the River and the Garden

A New Metaphor for Cultivating Mutualistic Relationship Between Scientific and Traditional Ecological Knowledge
  • Robin W. Kimmerer
  • Robin W. Kimmerer

Abstract

In the spirit of the intellectual pluralism which the meeting of traditional and scientific ecological knowledge demands, this essay arises from a diversity of knowledge sources. An important principle of knowledge transmission in many indigenous cultures, is the acknowledgement that there are many truths, depending on the perspective and experiences of the teller (Sinclair 1994, Simpson 2000), so it is important to identify that perspective at the outset. I am an Anishinabekwe of mixed Native and European heritage and a member of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation.

Keywords

Science Education Indigenous People Knowledge System Traditional Knowledge Indigenous Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification. International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26, 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. (2001). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31(3), 337–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aikenhead, G. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification. International Social Science Journal, 54(173), 287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aikenhead, G., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 539–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aikenhead, G., & Mitchell, H. (2011). Bridging Cultures: Indigenous and Scientific Ways of Knowing Nature. Toronto: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  7. Bartlett, C. (2006). Knowledge inclusivity: “Two-Eyed seeing” for science for the 21st century. In: Wiber, M, Kearney J. (Eds.) Proceedings of the workshop on Learning Communities as a tool for resource managemnet, 4–5 November 2005. Halifax, pp. 70–76.Google Scholar
  8. Bartlett, C. M., Marshall, A., & Marshall, M. (2007). Integrative Science: enabling concepts within a journey guided by “Trees Holding Hands” and “Two-Eyed Seeing”. Two-Eyed Seeing Knowledge Sharing Series, Manuscript No. 1. Nova Scotia, Canada: Institute for Integrative Science & Health, Cape Breton University.Google Scholar
  9. Bartlett, C. M., Murdena, M., & Marshall, A. (2012). Two-Eyed seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. Journal of Environmental Studies and Science.DOI  10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8 Google Scholar
  10. Battiste, M., & Youngblood Henderson, J. (2000). Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: A Global Challenge. Saskatoon: Purich.Google Scholar
  11. Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous Knowledge and Pedagogy in First Nations Education: A Literature Review with Recommendations. Ottawa: Apamuwek Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Becker, C. D., & Ghimire, K. (2003). Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conservation Ecology, 8(1), 1.Google Scholar
  13. Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  14. Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred Ecology. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bohensky, E. L., & Maru, Y. (2011). Indigenous knowledge, science, and resilience: What have we learned from a decade of international literature on ‘integration’? Ecology and Society, 16(4), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the Mountain: An Ecology of Indigenous Education. Skyland, NC: Kivaki.Google Scholar
  18. Cajete, G. (1999). Igniting the Sparkle: An Indigenous Science Education Model. Skyland, NC: Kivaki.Google Scholar
  19. Cajete, G. (2008). Seven orientations for the development of indigenous science education. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 487–96). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  20. Colorado, P., & Collins, D. (1987). Western scientific colonialism and the reemergence of native science. Practice: Journal of Politics, Economics, Psychology, Sociology and Culture, (winter), 50–65.Google Scholar
  21. Corsiglia, J., & Snively, G. (1995). Global lessons from the traditional science of long resident peoples. In G. Snively & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Thinking Globally about Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 25–51) Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada): University of British Columbia Centre for the Study of Curriculum and Instruction.Google Scholar
  22. Corsiglia, J., & Snively, G. (1997). Knowing home: Nisga’s traditional knowledge and wisdom improve environmental decision making. Alternatives Journal, 23(3), 22–27.Google Scholar
  23. Cronin, W. (1983). Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill &Wang.Google Scholar
  24. Davis, B. (2006). Complexity and Education: Inquiries into Learning, Teaching and Research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Deloria, V. (1992). Ethnoscience and Indian Realities. Winds of Change, 7(3), 12–18.Google Scholar
  26. Deloria, V. (1995). Red earth, white lies. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  27. Drew, J. (2005). Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology, 19, 1286–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Driben, P., Auger, D., Doob, A., & Auger, R. (1997). “No killing ground” Aboriginal law governing the killing of wildlife among the Cree and Ojibwa of northern Ontario. Ayaaggwaamizin, 1, 91–108.Google Scholar
  29. Ermine, Willie. (1995). “Aboriginal Epistemology.” In First Nations Education in Canada: The Circle Unfolds, (Eds.) Marie Battiste and Jean Barman, 101–12. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ermine, W. (2000). The ethics of research involving aboriginal peoples. (Unpublished Masters Thesis). University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
  31. Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., & Jeffery, B. (2004). The Ethics of Research Involving Indigenous Peoples. Saskatoon: Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre.Google Scholar
  32. Faircloth, S. C., & Tippeconnic, J. W. (2004). Utilizing research methods that respect and empower indigenous knowledge. Tribal College Journal, 16(2).Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M. (1978). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  34. Garibaldi, A., & Turner, N. (2004). Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society, 9(3), [online].Google Scholar
  35. Good, R. G., Shymansky, J. A., & Yore, L. D. (1999). Censorship in science and science education. In E.H. Brinkley (Ed.), Caught off guard: Teachers rethinking censorship and controversy (pp. 101–121). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. Green, L. J. F. (2009). Challenging epistemologies: Exploring knowledge practices in Palikur astronomy. Futures, 41(1), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hatcher, A. (2012). Building cultural bridges with aboriginal learners and their “classmates” for transformative environmental education. Journal of Environmnetal Science and Studies,DOI  10.1007/s13412-012-0088-6.Google Scholar
  38. Hauser, V., Howlett, C. & Matthews, C. (2009). The place of indigenous knowledge in tertiary science education: A case study of Canadian practices in indigenising the curriculum.n Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38(S), 46–57.Google Scholar
  39. Hobson, G. (1992). Traditional knowledge IS science. Northern Perspectives, 20(1), 2.Google Scholar
  40. Howitt, R., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2003). Ontological pluralism in contested cultural landscapes. In K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile & N. Thrift (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 557–569). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Howlett, C., Seini, M., Matthews, C., Dillon, B., & Hauser, V. (2008). “Retaining indigenous students in tertiary education” Lessons from the Griffith School of Environment. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37, 18–27.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, M. (1992). Lore: Capturing traditional environmental knowledge. Ottawa, ON: Dene Cultural Institute, International Development Research Center, Canadian Museum of Nature.Google Scholar
  43. Kawagley, A. O., Norris-Tull, D., & Norris-Tull, R. A. (1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq Culture: Its scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kimmerer, R. W. (2002). Weaving traditional ecological knowledge into biological education: A call to action. BioScience, 52(5), 432–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kimmerer, R. W. (2012). Searching for synergy: integrating traditional and scientific ecological knowledge in environmental science education. Journal of Environmental Studies.DOI  10.1007/s13412-012-0091-4.Google Scholar
  46. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lickers, H. (1997). “Can’t see the forest for the trees: a Native American’s perspective.” In Biodiversity: Toward Operational Definitions (1995 Plum Creek Lectures), (Ed.) Nick Baker, 39–53. Missoula, MT: School of Forestry, University of Montana.Google Scholar
  48. Longboat, D. R. (Kanienkeha:ka, Turtle Clan). (2008). Owehna’shon:A (the Islands) the Haudenosaunee Archipelago: The Nature and Necessity of Bio-Cultural Restoration and Revitalization. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
  49. Maffi, L. (2001). On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge, and the environment., Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  50. Maffi, L., & Woodley, E. (2010). Biocultural diversity conservation: A global sourcebook. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  51. Maffie, J. (2009). ‘In the end, we have the Gatling gun, and they have not’: Future prospects of indigenous knowledges. Futures, 41(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Malatest & Associates Ltd. (2004). Aboriginal peoples and post-secondary education: What educators have learned. Montreal: Canadian Milennium Scholarship Foundation.Google Scholar
  53. McGregor, D. (2000). “The State of Traditional Ecological Knowledge Research in Canada: A Critique of Current Theory and Practice.” In Expressions in Canadian Native Studies, (Eds.) Ron F. Laliberte, Priscilla Settee, James B.Waldram, Rob Innes, Brenda Macdougall, Lesley McBain and F. Laurie Barron, 436–58. Saskatoon: Univ. of Saskatchewan Extension.Google Scholar
  54. McGreor, D. (2002). “Traditional Ecological Knowledge and the Two-Row Wampum.” Biodiversity 3(3), 8–9. doi: 10.1080/14888386.2002.9712586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McGregor, D. (2004). “Coming Full Circle: Indigenous Knowledge, Environment, and Our Future.” American Indian Quarterly 28, 385–410. doi: 10.1353/aiq.2004.0101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McGregor, D. (2008). Linking traditional ecological knowledge and western science: Aboriginal perspectives from the 2000 SOLEC. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 28(1), 139–58.Google Scholar
  57. McGregor, D. (2009). “Linking Traditional Knowledge and Environmental Practice in Ontario.” Journal of Canadian Studies 43(3), 69–100. ProQuest (1920695141).Google Scholar
  58. McLisky, C. & Day, D. (2004). Black and white science: Encouraging indigenous Australian students into University science and technology. Sydney, NSW: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  59. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current Status and Trends. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  60. Michell, H., Vizina, Y., Augustus, C., & Sawyer, J. (2008). Learning indigenous science from place; final report (CCL); 158pp. accessed May 2009 at http://www.ccl-cca/pdfs/FundedResearch/Michell-FinalReport-14Nov2008-AbL2006.pdf
  61. Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O., & Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge; monitoring populations for co-managemnet. Ecology and Society, 9(3), 2 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2
  62. Moore, S. (2012). A trickster tale about integrating Indigenous knowledge in university-based programs. Journal of Environmental Studies and Science.DOI  10.1007/s13412-012-0089-5.Google Scholar
  63. Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 7–14.Google Scholar
  64. Petch, V. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge: an anthropological perspective in In Aboriginal Health, Identity, and Resources, (Eds.) Jill Oakes, Rick Riewe, Skip Koolage, Leanne Simpson and Nancy Schuster, 137–149. Winnipeg:Google Scholar
  65. Procter, A. (2000). “Traditional environmental knowledge: An analysis of the discourse.” In Aboriginal Health, Identity, and Resources, (Eds.) Jill Oakes, Rick Riewe, Skip Koolage, Leanne Simpson and Nancy Schuster, 150–64. Winnipeg: Departments of Native Studies and Zoology, and Faculty of Graduate Studies, Univ. of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  66. Ransom, James W., & Kreg T. Ettenger. (2001). “‘Polishing the Kaswentha’: A Haudenosaunee view of environmental cooperation.” Environmental Science and Policy, 4(4–5), 219–28. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00027-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rich, N. (2011). Restoring relationships: Indigenous ways of knowing meet science and environmental studies in undergraduate education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Antioch University.Google Scholar
  68. Richards, R. T. (1997). What the natives know: Wild mushrooms and forest health. Journal of Forestry, 95, 5–10.Google Scholar
  69. Riggs, E. M. (2005). Field-based education and indigenous knowledge: Essential components of geoscience education for native American communities. Science Education, 89, 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rose, D. B. (1999). Indigenous ecologies and an ethic of connection. In N. Low (Ed.), Global ethics and the environment (pp. 175–187). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Salmon, E. (1996). Decolonizing our voices. Winds of Change, (summer), 70–72.Google Scholar
  72. Simpson, L. (2000). “Anishinaabe ways of knowing.” In Aboriginal Health, Identity, and Resources, (Eds.) Jill Oakes, Rick Riewe, Skip Koolage, Leanne Simpson and Nancy Schuster, 165–85. Winnipeg: Departments of Native Studies and Zoology, and Faculty of Graduate Studies, Univ. of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  73. Simpson, L. (2002). Indigenous environmental education for cultural survival. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 13–25.Google Scholar
  74. Sinclair, M. (1994). Aboriginal peoples and Euro-Canadians: Two world views. In J. Hylton (Ed.) Aboriginal Self Government in Canada.:Current Trends and Issues. (pp. 19–48) Saskatoon: Zurich Publishing.Google Scholar
  75. Smart, B. (1986). The politics of truth and the problem of hegemony. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 157–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  76. Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Snively, G., & Williams, L. (2006). The aboriginal knowledge and science education research project. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 29(2), 229–245.Google Scholar
  78. Snively, G. J., & Williams, L. B. (2008). “Coming to know”: Weaving aboriginal and western science knowledge, language, and literacy into the science classroom. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(1), 109–33.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  80. Southerland, S. A. (2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & Education, 9, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. UNEP. (1998). Report of the fourth meeting of the parties to the convention on biodiversity. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin W. Kimmerer
    • 1
  • Robin W. Kimmerer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Forest BiologyUnited States
  2. 2.Center for Native Peoples and the EnvironmentSUNY College of Environmental Science and ForestryUnited States

Personalised recommendations