Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Primary Education

Opportunities and Supporting Conditions
  • Cher Ping Lim
  • Grace Oakley


It is increasingly recognised by researchers, governments and educators around the world that ICT presents many opportunities for teaching and learning in primary (elementary) education. A lack of ICT in the classroom may be seen as disadvantageous for children because without access to this, they are denied opportunities to acquire some of the skills and attributes they need to become full participants in an increasingly ICT mediated and globalised world (UNESCO, 2008). Even so, it needs to be acknowledged that having ICT in the primary curriculum and classroom does not guarantee enhanced learning, and may represent little more than new means of reaching pre-existing, and perhaps inappropriate or outdated, ends (Adams, 2011). Furthermore, ICT in education needs to be supported by appropriate policies (Tondeur, van Keer, van Braak & Valcke, 2008) at all levels and effective professional development for teachers (Lim, 2007).


Professional Development Primary Classroom Computer Assist Learn Computer Assist Language Learn Internet Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, P. (2011). ICT and pedagogy: Opportunities missed. Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 39(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  2. Alfassi, M. (2000). Using information and communication technology to foster literacy and facilitate discourse within the classroom. Education Media International, 37(3), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). Australia Curriculum: General Capabilities.
  4. Barker, B. S., & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 229–243.Google Scholar
  5. Biesenbach-Lucas, S., Meloni, C., & Weasenforth, D. (2000). Use of cohesive features in ESL students’ e-mail and word-processed texts: A comparative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, G., Miles, J., Torgerson, C., & Torgerson, D. (2006). Is an intervention using computer software effective in literacy learning? A randomized controlled trial. Educational Studies, 32(1), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, T., Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Duffy, A. M., & Wolf, P. G. (2010). Learning with web tools, simulations, and other technologies in science classrooms. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 19, 505–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carbonaro, M., Szafron, D., Cutumisu, M., & Schaeffer, J. (2010). Computer-game construction: A gender-neutral attractor to Computing Science. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1098–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, K., Wu, L., Weng, S., & Sung, Y. (2011). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Computers & Education, 58, 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The Early Years Learning Framework for Australia.
  12. Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Divaharan, S., & Lim, C. P. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration: A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 741–763.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, V., Monaghan, F., & Knight, J. (2000). Books, pictures and conversations: Using bilingual multimedia storybooks to develop language awareness. Language Awareness, 9(3), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fasting, R. B., & Lyster, S. H. (2005). The effects of computer technology in assisting the development of literacy in young struggling readers and spellers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2009). In a reading state of mind: Brain research, teacher modelling , and comprehension instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  17. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding teacher development. New York: College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gambrell, L. B. (2006). Technology and the engaged literacy learner. In M. C. McKenna, L. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 289–294). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992–2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1).
  20. Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4), 943–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gürbüz, R., & Bergin, O. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted teaching on remedying misconceptions: The case of the subject “probability”. Computers & Education, 58, 931–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halat, E., & Peker, M. (2011). The impacts of mathematical representations developed through webquest and spreadsheet activities on the motivation of pre-service elementary school teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 259–267.Google Scholar
  24. Halsey, S. (2007). Embracing emergent technologies and envisioning new ways of using them for literacy learning in the primary classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 88–107.Google Scholar
  25. Handsfield, L. J., Dean, T. R., & Cielocha, C. M. (2009). Becoming critical consumers and producers of text: Teaching literacy with Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. The Reading Teacher, 63(1), 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartley, J. (2007). Teaching, learning and new technology: A review for teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huffaker, D. (2005). The educated blogger: Using weblogs to promote literacy in the classroom. AACE Journal, 13(2), 91–98.Google Scholar
  28. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, R. M. (2003). Local and national ICT policies. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective (pp.163–94). Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  30. Lai, C. & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing in text-based online chat. Language Learning and Technology, 10(3), 102–120.Google Scholar
  31. Lai, K. W., & Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: The role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Law, N., & Chow, A. (2010). Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In N. Law, W. J. Pelgrum, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study (pp. 181–219). ICT: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, S. C. (2001). Development of instructional strategy of computer application software for group instruction. Computers and Education, 37, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leu, D. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Lewin, C., Somekh, B., & Steadman, S. (2008). Embedding interactive whiteboards in teaching and learning: The process of change in pedagogic practice. Education and Information Technologies, 13(4), 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lim, C. P. (2007). Effective integration of ICT in Singapore school: pedagogical and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lim, C. P. (2008). Global citizenship education, school curriculum and games: Learning mathematics, English and science as a global citizen. Computers & Education, 51, 1073–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2010). A capacity-building toolkit for teacher education institutions in the Asia-Pacific.Singapore: Microsoft.Google Scholar
  39. Lim, C. P., Nonis, D. & Hedberg, J. (2006). Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: Engaging students in science lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lim, C. P., & Tay, Y. (2003). Information and communication technologies (ICT) in an elementary school: Students’ engagement in higher-order thinking. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(4), 425–451.Google Scholar
  41. Lin, C. P., Shao, Y. J., Wong, L. H., Li, Y. J., & Niramtranon, J. (2011). The impact of using synchronous collaborative virtual tangram in children’s geometric. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 250–258.Google Scholar
  42. Lirola, M. M, & Cuevas, M, T. (2008). Integrating CALL and Genre Theory: A proposal to increase students’ literacy. ReCALL, 20(1), 67–81.Google Scholar
  43. Littlejohn, A. H. (2002). Improving continuing professional development in the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loveless, A. (2003). The interaction between primary teachers’ perceptions of ICT and their pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 8(4), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computer and Education, 56, 1072–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Manches, A., O’Malley, C., & Benford, S. (2010). The role of physical representations in solving number problems: A comparison of young children’s use of physical and virtual materials. Computers & Education, 54, 622–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McFarlane, A. (2001). Perspectives on the relationships between ICT and assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McFarlane, A., & Sakellariou, S. (2002). The role of ICT in science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(22), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merchant, G. (2010). 3D virtual worlds as environments for literacy learning. Educational Research, 52(2), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, T. (2009). Formative computer-based assessment in higher education: The effectiveness of feedback in supporting student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mills, K. A. (2010). A review of the “digital turn’“ in the new literacy studies. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moyer, P., Bolyard, J., & Spikell, M. (2001). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 373–377.Google Scholar
  53. Murphy, C. (2006). The impact of ICT on primary science. In P. Warwick, E. Wilson, & M. Winterbottom (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Primary Science with ICT. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers’ instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oakley, G. (2003). Improving oral reading fluency (and comprehension) through the creation of electronic talking books.
  56. Oakley, G. (2005). Reading fluency as an outcome of a repertoire of interactive reading competencies: How to teach it to different types of dysfluent readers (and how ICT can help). New England Reading Association Journal, 41(1), 13–21.Google Scholar
  57. Oakley, G., & Jay, J. (2008). Making time for reading: Factors that influence the success of multimedia reading in the home. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Dwyer, L. M., Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Seeley, K. (2008). Examining the relationship between students’ mathematics test scores and computer use at home and at school. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 6(5).
  59. O’Rourke, M. (2001). Engaging students through ICT: A multiliteracies approach. Teacher Learning Network Journal: Change, Growth, Innovation, 8(3), 12–13.Google Scholar
  60. Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (in press). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  61. Prestridge, S. (2010). ICT professional development for teachers in online forums: Analyzing the role of discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rodrigues, S., Marks, A., & Steel, P. (2003). Developing science and ICT pedagogical content knowledge: A model of continuing professional development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(4), 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schacter, J., & Fagnano, C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shang, H. (2007). An exploratory study of e-mail application on FL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(1),79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., & van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51, 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Torgesen, J. K., & Elbourne, D. (2002). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of information and communication technology (ICT) on the teaching of spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. UNESCO. (2008). Strategy framework for promoting ICT literacy in the Asia-Pacific region. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  69. Vallance, M. (2008). Beyond policy: Strategic actions to support ICT integration in Japanese schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 275–293.Google Scholar
  70. Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2011). A new ICT curriculum for primary education in Flanders: Defining and predicting teachers’ perceptions of innovation attributes. Educational Technology and Society, 14(2), 124–35.Google Scholar
  71. Watts, M., & Lloyd, C. (2004). The use of innovative ICT in the active pursuit of literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wei, C. W., Hung, I. C., Lee, L., & Chen, N. S. (2011). A joyful classroom learning system with robot learning companion for children to learn mathematics multiplication. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 11–24.Google Scholar
  73. Wise, B., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (2000). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang, S. C. (2009). A case study of technology-enhanced historical inquiry. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yelland, N., & Kilderry, A. (2010). Becoming numerate with information and communications technologies in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Early Years Education, 18(2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yien, J. M., Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Lin, Y. C. (2011). A game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning achievements in a nutrition course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  77. Yuen, H. K., Law, N., & Wong, K. C. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership. Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 158–170.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cher Ping Lim
    • 1
  • Grace Oakley
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Learning, Teaching and TechnologyHong Kong Institute of EducationHong Kong
  2. 2.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of Western AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations