The use of knowledge sources amongst novice accountants, engineers, nurses and teachers

An exploratory study
  • Leif Chr. Lahn


The concept of epistemification (Stutt & Motta, 1998; Hakkarainen, Pelonen, Paavola, & Lehtinen, 2004) has recently made its way into the literature on technology and society.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barley, S.R. & Orr, J. (1997). Between craft and science. Technical work in the United States. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(5), 1021–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54.Google Scholar
  4. Borseix, A. & Fraenkel, B. (Eds.) (2001). Language et travail. Communication, cognition, action. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
  5. Boshuizen, H.P.A., Bromme, R., & Gruber, H. (Eds.) (2004). Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Briscoe, J.P. & Hall, D.T. (2006). Special section on boundaryless and protean careers: Next steps in conceptualizing and measuring boundaryless and protean careers. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 69(1), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S.D. & Middleton, D. (2005). The baby as virtual object: Agency and difference in a neonatal intensive care unit. Environment and Planning, 23, 695–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruni, A. (2005). Shadowing software and clinical records: On the ethnography of non-humans and heterogeneous contexts. Organization, 12(3), 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Parolin, L.L. (2007). Knowing in a system of fragmented knowledge. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(1 & 2), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Chau, V.S. & Witcher, B.J. (2005). Longitudinal tracer studies: Research methodology of the middle range. British Journal of Management, 16(4), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Czarniawska, B. & Hernes, T. (2005). Actor-network theory and organizing. Malmo: Liber.Google Scholar
  13. Diaper, D. & Stanton, N.A. (2003). Handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  14. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1993) Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eklund, A.-C., Mäkitalo, Å., & Säljö, R. (2010). Noticing the past to manage the future. On the organization of shared knowing in IT-support practices. In S. Ludvigsen, I. Rasmussen, A. Lund & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites. New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 122–138). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Emery, F. & Trist, E. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eraut, M. (2006). Knowledge in a knowledge society: Five transitions. Knowledge, Work & Society, 4(3), 23–42.Google Scholar
  18. Evetts, J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism. Occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18(2), 395–415.Google Scholar
  19. Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J., & Kokinov, B. (Eds.) (2001). The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2003). To transfer is to transform: The circulation of safety knowledge. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations. A practice-based approach (pp. 329–348). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  21. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. & Hinings, C.R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hakkarainen, K., Pelonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise. Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  23. Harper, R.H.P. (2000). The organisation in ethnography – A discussion of ethnographic fieldwork programs in CSCW. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 9(2), 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heath, C., Knoblauch, H., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology and social interaction: The emergence of "workplace studies." British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoc, J.M. (2008). Cognitive ergonomics: A multidisciplinary venture. Ergonomics, 51(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kent, P., Noss, R., Guile, D., Hoyles, C., & Bakker, A. (2007). Characterizing the use of mathematical knowledge in boundary-crossing situations at work. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1-2), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klette, K. (2007). Research gaps in classroom practices. Invited presentation "Research gaps in teaching and teacher education. EARLI Budapest, 28.08-03.09.08.Google Scholar
  29. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Knorr-Cetina, K. (2006). Knowledge in a knowledge society: Five transitions. Knowledge, Work & Society, 4(3), 23–41.Google Scholar
  31. Knorr-Cetina, K. & Bruegger, U. (2002). Traders' engagement with markets. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5-6), 161185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pels, D., Hetherington, K., & Vandenberghe, F. (2002). The status of the object: Performance, mediations and techniques. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5-6), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Puonti, A. (2003). Collaboration as a learning challenge: Constructing a common understanding between police officers and tax inspectors. Police Practice and Research, 4(2), 131–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rasmussen, J. (2000). Human factors in a dynamic information society: Where are we heading? Ergonomics, 43(7), 869879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Stutt, A. & Motta, E. (1998). Knowledge modelling: An organic technology for the knowledge age. In M. Eisenstadt & T. Vincent (Eds.), The knowledge web: Learning and collaboration on the net (pp. 211–224). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  39. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Norwood, NJ: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leif Chr. Lahn
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations