Advertisement

Designing Principles for High Energy Absorbing Materials

  • Tünde Anna KovácsEmail author
  • Zoltán Nyikes
Conference paper
  • 25 Downloads
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)

Abstract

The focus target of our century and even of all centuries in the history is the security. Every state wants to guard their own functionality and citizens. The treasure of the nations are firstly peoples (soft target) and after all, buildings and assets.

The construction engineering used the traditional materials and designing a long time ago. In our century, the useful materials are changed and the building operations technologies are developed and changed. Great example is the new idea of 3D printed houses. In case of the new buildings many special loads have to be considered (earthquake, blast load, flood, etc.), and also this knowledge has to be taken into account in design of buildings, and there is a need to use resistant materials for such loads. Lot of innovated materials (metal foams, special composites) have appeared in the last decade. Polymer composites with new segments, like the reinforcing fibers (glass fiber, carbon fiber, aramid fiber) and the special property acrylates can be used. The functional innovation for special loads and high energy absorbing is supported on the basic theories of the designing principles by material selection and the combination with their realisation. The base of this innovation is the knowledge of the design principles of the requirements of these loads.

This work it can try to introduce the designing principles and the designing for high-energy absorbing materials what can be the base of the material science innovations.

Keywords

High energy absorbing Composite designing Blast protection 

References

  1. 1.
    Mostert FJ (2018) Challenges in blast protection research. Def Technol 14:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Unified facilities criteria (UFC) DoD minimum antiterrorism standards for buildings, UFC 4–010-01 9 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Physical Security and Antiterrorism Design Guide For DoDEA Educational Facilities, Alexandria, VA 22311 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashby MF, Jones DRH (2005) An introduction to properties, applications and design. In: Engineering materials 1, 3rd edn. Elsevier, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hinman E (2003) Primer for design of commercial buildings to mitigate terrorist attacks, Risk management series FEMA. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lange D (2013) A review of blast loading and explosions in the context of multifunctional buildings. Fire technology SP Technical Research Institut of Sweden, BoråsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gay E, Berthe L, Boustie M, Arrigoni M, Buzaud E (2014) Effects of the shock duration on the response of CFRP composite laminates. J Phys D Appl Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/45/455303
  8. 8.
    Figuli L, Kavicky V, Jangl S, Zvakova Z (2018) Comparison of the efficacy of homemade and industrially made ANFO explosives as an improvised explosive device charge. Commun – Sci Lett Univ Zilina 20(2):23–27Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Figuli L, Jangl Š, Papán D (2016) Modelling and testing of blast effect on the structures, IOP conference series. Earth Environ Sci 44(5):052051Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu G, Yu T (2000) Energy absorption of structures and materials. Woodhead Publishing Limited, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qiao P, Yang M, Bobaru F (2008) Impact mechanics and high-energy absorbing materials: review. J Aerosp Eng 21(4):235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou H, Wang X, Ma G, Liu Z (2017) On the effectiveness of blast mitigation with lightweight claddings. Process Eng 210:148–153Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Figuli L, Štaffenová D (2017) Practical aspect of methods used for blast protection. In: Key engineering materials, vol 755. Trans Tech Publications, Zürich, pp 139–146Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cui L, Kiernan S, Gilchrist MD (2009) Designing the energy absorption capacity if functionally graded foam materials. Mater Sci Eng A, Vol 507 1–2:215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Figuli L, Jangl Š, Papán D (2016) Modelling and testing of blast effect on the structures. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 44(5):052051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kovács T, Nyikes Z, Figuli L (2018) Testing of high energy absorbing materials for blast protection. Acta Mater Transylvanica 1(2):93–96.  https://doi.org/10.2478/amt-2018-0034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bánki Donát Faculty of Mechanical and Safety EngineeringÓbuda UniversityBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Doctoral School on Safety and Security ScienceÓbuda UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations