Disaster Risk Evaluation – Qualitative Methods

  • Nirupama Agrawal
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 49)

Abstract

Perceptions of risks are significant in the decision-making process. Furthermore, the level of risk acceptance varies between individuals, communities and cultures. Given recent advances in the social sciences and psychology, new theories and research in disaster management focus on understanding the root causes of individuals’ changing social, physical, economic and environmental vulnerabilities. Accounting for stakeholders’ perceptions is an important part of the process. This closing chapter discusses qualitative approaches to evaluating vulnerability and risk that reflect the progression of vulnerabilities; access to resources; and community perceptions.

References

  1. ADRC (2005) Major disasters in FY2005 http://www.adrc.asia/publications/stats/MajorDisasters2005.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  2. Armenakis C, Nirupama N (2013) Estimating spatial disaster risk in urban environments, geomatics, natural hazards and risk. Taylor & Francis 4(4):289–298Google Scholar
  3. Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, New York, 524pGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkmann J (2007) Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: applicability, usefulness and policy implications. Environ Hazard 7(2007):20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Etkin D, Haque EC (2003) An assessment of natural hazards and disasters in Canada. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrier N, Haque CE (2003) Hazards risk assessment methodology for emergency managers: a standardized framework for application. Nat Hazards 28(2):271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GTZ (2004) Guidelines risk analysis – a basis for disaster risk management. Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, EschbornGoogle Scholar
  8. HRVA (2004) Hazard, Risk, and Vulnerability Assessment toolkit, Emergency Management British Columbia, Canada http://hrva.embc.gov.bc.ca/toolkit.html
  9. ISDR (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction www.unisdr.org 429p
  10. Mathew A, Kelly K (2008) disaster preparedness in urban immigrant communities: lessons learned from recent catastrophic events and their relevance to Latino and Asian Communities in Southern California, The Tomás Rivera Policy Institute University of Southern California. School of Policy, Planning and Development, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  11. Nirupama N (2008) Disaster risk management: theory, practice and policy, Workshop report: public safety Canada. Government of Canada, Ottawa, 149pGoogle Scholar
  12. Olanubi T (2009) Crisis management and psychosocial intervention: perception of immigrants, Major Research Paper, MA in Disaster & Emergency Management, York UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. PSC (2015) The Canadian disaster database, public safety Canada. http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/cndn-dsstr-dtbs/index-eng.aspx. Accessed 11 Mar 2016
  14. Raaijmakers R, Jörg K, Van der Veen A (2008) Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Nat Hazards 46(3):307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schneider Th, Basler E, Partner AG (2006) A delicate issue in risk assessment, In Proceedings RISK21 Workshop, Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland, 28 Nov–3 Dec 2004, (Eds.) W.J. Ammann, S. Dannenmann, L. Vulliet, Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  16. Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan Publications, London, 473 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Stewart RM (2007) Community perspectives of flood risk and social vulnerability reduction: the case of the Red River Basin, Doctoral Thesis, The Natural Resources Institute, The University of Manitoba, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  18. Twigg J (2007) Characteristics of a Disaster-resilient Community. DFID Disaster Risk Reduction Interagency Coordination Group, 39pGoogle Scholar
  19. Whyte AV, Burton I (1982) Perception of risk in Canada. In: Burton I, Fowle CD, McCullough RS (eds) Living with risk. University of Toronto, Toronto, pp 39–69Google Scholar
  20. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, 471pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nirupama Agrawal
    • 1
  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations