Advertisement

Primordial and Primary Levels of Biothreat and Bioterrorism Prevention

  • Vladan Radosavljevic
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)

Abstract

There is still an abundance of preventive and solving measures against biological attacks that makes confusion and dezorientation among experts and health policy-makers. Our pyramidal model of adversaries, and spherical system of prevention help us to solve this problem. They make clearly to us, which measures should be applied at any of four levels of prevention without robust spending.

Primordial level of prevention should be focused to stop entering perpetrator/source of infection/reservoir of pathogen and biological agent/pathogen on defended territory. This is the first line of biodefense, deeply and multiply linked with the strategies of intelligence and deterrence.

The primary prevention of biological attack is focused on monitoring and surveillance of potential internal sources of biological agents and bioterrorists. We elaborate three types of surveillance: clinical (syndromic), laboratory and environmental.

Both levels of prevention were detailed analyzed, according to the next issues: Perpetrator/source of infection/reservoir of pathogen (Sophistication, Motivation, Intention, Intelligence, Secrecy, Number of perpetrators, Number of sources of infection/reservoirs, Accessibility to sources of agent/pathogen, Accessibility to targets/population at risk), Biological agent/pathogen (A category, B category, C category, Emerging pathogens, Amount of the available agent/pathogen), Means/media of delivery/factors of transmission (Air, Water, Food, Fomites, Vectors, Biological ammunition, Delivery systems, Dispersion systems mechanism of release), Target/susceptible population at risk (Intelligence, Secrecy, Personal control, Control of means/media of delivery/factors of transmission, Physical protection, Protection by chemoprophylaxis, Protection by immunoprophilaxis, Number of people in a target/population at risk, Importance of target/population at risk, Location of target/population, Distribution of people in a target/population at risk), and for each issue a whole spectrum of cheap, simple and effective preventive measures were proposed.

References

  1. 1.
    Radosavljevic V (2016) Biodefense system – communicable diseases and public health. J Bioterror Biodef 7:e121.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-2526.1000e121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Radosavljevic V (2012) Strategies in fighting bioterrorism. J Bioterr Biodef 3:e1012.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-2526.1000e102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Radosavljevic V, Belojevic GA (2009) new model of bioterrorism risk assessment. Biosecur Bioterror 7:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radosavljevic V, Belojevic G (2012) Unusual epidemilogical event – new model for early orientation and differentiation between natural and deliberate outbreak. Public Health 126(1):77–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Radosavljevic V, Finke E-J, Belojevic G (2015) Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak in Germany—clarification of the origin of the epidemic. Eur J Public Health 25(1):125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Radosavljevic VA (2013) new method of differentiation between a biological attack and other epidemics. In: Hunger I, Radosavljevic V, Belojevic G, Rotz L (eds) Biopreparedness and public health. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radosavljevic V, Finke E-J, Belojevic G (2016) Analysis of the Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak in Germany in 2011 by a differentiation method for unusual epidemiological events. Cent Eur J Public Health 24(1):9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Radosavljevic V, Stojkovic K, Anđelkovic R, Andrejic M (2010) Agroterrorism as actual challenge. Vojnosanit pregl 67(11):933–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Radosavljevic V, Belojevic G, Jovanovic L (2012) A mathematical model of bioterrorist attack risk assessment. J Bioterr Biodef 2:114.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-2526.1000114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Radosavljevic V, Jakovljevic B (2007) Review: Bioterrorism – types of epidemics, new epidemiological paradigm and levels of prevention. Public Health 121:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Radosavljevic V, Radunovic D, Belojevic G (2009) Epidemics of panic during a bioterrorist attack – a mathematical model. Med Hypothesis 73:342–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garamone J (2015) U.S., India sign 10-year defense framework agreement,” US Department of Defense. www.defense.gov
  13. 13.
    Galamas F (2011) Profile bioterrorism: present and potential threats. Comp Strateg 30:70–93Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sinha S, Singh J (2016) Classification, causes, control measures and acts of bioterrorism. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol 7(2):342–354Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG et al (1999) Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. Working group on civilian biodefense. JAMA 281:1735–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alberts B (2005) Modeling attacks on the food supply. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9737–9738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wein LM, Liu Y (2005) Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: the case of botulinum toxin in milk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9984–9989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nuzzo J (2006) The biological threat to U.S. water supplies: toward a national water security policy. Biosecur Bioterror 4:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burrows WD, Renner SE (1999) Biological warfare agents as threats to potable water. Environ Health Perspect 107:975–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nicholas E, Kman Daniel J (2012) Bachmann biosurveillance: a review and update. Adv Pre Med 2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/301408
  21. 21.
    Radosavljevic V (2011) Environmental health and bioterrorism. In: Nriagu JO (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental health, vol 2. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steinbrook R (2005) Biomedical research and biosecurity. New Engl J Med 353:2212–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Military Medical Headquarter, Ministry of DefenceBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.University of DefenceBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations